[U-Boot] [PATCH v6 00/27] SPI-NAND support

[Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>]

On Sat, 4 Aug 2018 09:23:05 +0200
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> wrote:

> Hi Jagan,
> 
> Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com> wrote on Fri, 3 Aug 2018
> 17:38:33 +0530:
> 
> > On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 3:20 PM, Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com> wrote:  
> > > On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 1:57 PM, Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> wrote:    
> > >> Hi Jagan, Tom,
> > >>
> > >> Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> wrote on Wed,  1 Aug 2018
> > >> 10:18:21 +0200:
> > >>    
> > >>> During the last months, Boris Brezillon shared his work to support
> > >>> serial flashes within Linux. First, he delivered (and merged) a new
> > >>> layer called spi-mem. He also initiated in Linux MTD subsystem the move
> > >>> of all 'raw' NAND related code to a raw/ subdirectory, adding at the
> > >>> same time a NAND core that would be shared with all NAND devices. Then,
> > >>> he contributed a generic SPI-NAND driver, making use of this NAND core,
> > >>> as well as some vendor code to drive a few chips.
> > >>>
> > >>> On top of this work, I added an 'mtd' U-Boot command to handle all sort
> > >>> of MTD devices. This should become the default command instead of having
> > >>> one per flash flavor ('sf', 'nand', 'spi-nand' ?).
> > >>>
> > >>> The series has been tested on an Ocelot board PCB123 (VSC7514),
> > >>> featuring a Macronix SPI NAND chip.
> > >>>
> > >>> TL;DR: the series contains:
> > >>> - A few patches from Linux to resynchronize some areas of the MTD layer.
> > >>> - Various fixes and re-organization of the MTD subsystem.
> > >>> - The introduction of the SPI-mem interface.
> > >>> - The addition of the generic SPI-NAND driver (and its bindings).
> > >>> - Several SPI NAND chip drivers (Macronix, Micron, Winbond).
> > >>> - A new 'mtd' command.
> > >>> - Support for spi-nand devices in mtdparts.
> > >>>
> > >>> To test your SPI-NAND device with U-Boot simply follow these lines:
> > >>>    
> > >>> > setenv mtdparts mtdparts=spi-nand0:1m(foo),-(bar)
> > >>> > setenv mtdids spi-nand0=spi-nand0
> > >>> > mtdparts             # show the spi-nand device partitions
> > >>> > ubi part bar         # create a static UBI volume in the bar partition    
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks,
> > >>> Miquèl
> > >>>
> > >>> Changes since v5:
> > >>> -----------------
> > >>> * Included Boris fixup about the build issues.
> > >>> * Added Rb/Ab tags from Jagan on patchs 20/21.    
> > >>
> > >> I can't see a pull request flow on U-Boot ML, I suppose you use a
> > >> different mean for that purpose.
> > >>
> > >> Jagan, is this version OK? Is it part of your PR?    
> > >
> > > Travis is going on [1], will send PR once all fine.
> > >
> > > [1] https://travis-ci.org/openedev/u-boot-amarula/builds/411596788    
> > 
> > There are some build issues, not quite sure whether it relates. please
> > look into it.  
> 
> Thanks for the reports.
> 
> > 
> > [2] https://travis-ci.org/openedev/u-boot-amarula/jobs/411596814
> > [3] https://travis-ci.org/openedev/u-boot-amarula/jobs/411596815  
> 
> Boris supposedly fixed all the build issues related to my changes (I
> don't think the "missing interrupt parent" in a DTS file is related),
> please pull his branch [1].
> 
> The fixes are under the form of fixups if you wanna check them.
> Otherwise you can just 'rebase -i --autosquash' to automatically squash
> them with the commit introducing the regression.

One more thing, if you want to make things bisectable patch 6 ("mtd: fix
build issue with includes") and it's fixup should be squashed in patch 5
("mtd: add get/set of_node/flash_node helpers"), because the build
failure you're fixing in patch 6 is introduced by patch 5.

> 
> [1] https://travis-ci.org/openedev/u-boot-amarula/jobs/411596814

You mean

[1]https://github.com/bbrezillon/u-boot/commits/wip-spi