From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2018 14:38:34 +0900
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/17] fs: fat: extend FAT write operations
In-Reply-To: <0e0db5d8-a6d1-de49-f13c-adaf9622f58c@gmx.de>
References: <20180720025723.6736-1-takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
 <bbbff7c2-2bf6-db8c-f041-aa5a5c4054bf@gmx.de>
 <fa0b09c5-7b6c-b58d-7114-c5b52036e412@gmx.de>
 <20180723144640.GI11755@bill-the-cat>
 <0e0db5d8-a6d1-de49-f13c-adaf9622f58c@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <20180807053833.GO11258@linaro.org>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On Tue, Aug 07, 2018 at 12:34:28AM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 07/23/2018 04:46 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 08:44:39AM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> >> Hello Tom, hello Alex,
> >>
> >> I have been testing the patches. They are working fine for ASCII file
> >> names. To support Unicode file names extra work will be needed. But
> >> probably we should postpone this to a later patch series.
> >>
> >> There are some dependencies with my work for correcting errors in
> >> Unicode handling for the EFI branch. Should the patches be passed via
> >> efi-next?
> > 
> > Yes, a follow-up series makes sense, and yes, efi-next for the patches
> > themselves sounds fine, thanks!
> > 
> 
> Hello Takahiro,
> 
> could you, please, resubmit the series with the few changes needed so
> that Alex can consider them for efi-next.

Well, I'm sure that my patch set can be applied to v2018.09-rc1 w/o any
changes if your patch (0dc1bfb7302 "fs: fat: cannot write to subdirectories")
is reverted beforehand. As I said, my patch(#5/17) superseded it in terms of
its function.

What's more, I ran fs-test.sh again, and all tests passed, either against
fat16 or fat32. Do we still want to update a test result in fs-test.sh?
(removing it would be the easiest.)

Thanks,
-Takahiro AKASHI


> Cheers
> 
> Heinrich