From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tom Rini Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 08:28:39 -0500 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 66/93] arm: Remove ot1200 board In-Reply-To: References: <20181119155413.158098-1-sjg@chromium.org> <20181119155413.158098-67-sjg@chromium.org> <20181122125249.GA11247@bill-the-cat> Message-ID: <20181122132839.GC11247@bill-the-cat> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 02:24:49PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: > On 11/22/2018 01:52 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 10:25:14AM +0100, Christian Gmeiner wrote: > > > >> Am Mo., 19. Nov. 2018 um 16:56 Uhr schrieb Simon Glass : > >>> > >>> This board has not been converted to CONFIG_DM_BLK by the deadline. > >>> Remove it. > >>> > >> > >> As the board is still mainted I will NAK it for the moment. Are there > >> any hints want needs to be done > >> to port thie board over to new DM stuff? > > > > Yes, as a start you need to switch over to using CONFIG_OF_CONTROL and > > selecting/providing a dtb file. I see ot1200 is using DWC_AHSATA which > > needs more work, but this is the board-level work that needs doing. > > Wasn't there a possibility to use platform data in board file instead of > DT ? Or is DT mandatory now , including the libfdt overhead ? In short, DT for U-Boot and platform data for SPL is what's recommended, yes. -- Tom -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: not available URL: