public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] efi_loader: Make RTS relocation more robust
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 10:00:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181211090042.89935-1-agraf@suse.de> (raw)

While changing the RTS alignment to 64KB in commit 7a82c3051c8f
("efi_loader: Align runtime section to 64kb") the relocation code
started to break.

The reason for that is that we didn't actually look at the real
relocation data. We merely took the RUNTIME_CODE section as a
hint and started to relocate based on self calculated data from
that point on. That calculation was now out of sync though.

To ensure we're not running into such a situation again, this patch
makes the runtime relocation code a bit more robust. We can just
trust the phys/virt hints from the payload. We also should check that
we really only have a single section, as the code doesn't handle
multiple code relocations yet.

Fixes: 7a82c3051c8f ("efi_loader: Align runtime section to 64kb")
Reported-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
Reported-by: Loic Devulder <ldevulder@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>

---

v1 -> v2:

  - Add more verbose comment explaining why we have the
    sanity check.
---
 lib/efi_loader/efi_runtime.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/efi_runtime.c b/lib/efi_loader/efi_runtime.c
index 95844efdb0..fff93f0960 100644
--- a/lib/efi_loader/efi_runtime.c
+++ b/lib/efi_loader/efi_runtime.c
@@ -436,14 +436,42 @@ static efi_status_t EFIAPI efi_set_virtual_address_map(
 			uint32_t descriptor_version,
 			struct efi_mem_desc *virtmap)
 {
-	ulong runtime_start = (ulong)&__efi_runtime_start &
-			      ~(ulong)EFI_PAGE_MASK;
 	int n = memory_map_size / descriptor_size;
 	int i;
+	int rt_code_sections = 0;
 
 	EFI_ENTRY("%lx %lx %x %p", memory_map_size, descriptor_size,
 		  descriptor_version, virtmap);
 
+	/*
+	 * TODO:
+	 * Further down we are cheating. While really we should implement
+	 * SetVirtualAddressMap() events and ConvertPointer() to allow
+	 * dynamically loaded drivers to expose runtime services, we don't
+	 * today.
+	 *
+	 * So let's ensure we see exactly one single runtime section, as
+	 * that is the built-in one. If we see more (or less), someone must
+	 * have tried adding or removing to that which we don't support yet.
+	 * In that case, let's better fail rather than expose broken runtime
+	 * services.
+	 */
+	for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
+		struct efi_mem_desc *map = (void*)virtmap +
+					   (descriptor_size * i);
+
+		if (map->type == EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_CODE)
+			rt_code_sections++;
+	}
+
+	if (rt_code_sections != 1) {
+		/*
+		 * We expose exactly one single runtime code section, so
+		 * something is definitely going wrong.
+		 */
+		return EFI_EXIT(EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER);
+	}
+
 	/* Rebind mmio pointers */
 	for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
 		struct efi_mem_desc *map = (void*)virtmap +
@@ -483,7 +511,7 @@ static efi_status_t EFIAPI efi_set_virtual_address_map(
 		map = (void*)virtmap + (descriptor_size * i);
 		if (map->type == EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_CODE) {
 			ulong new_offset = map->virtual_start -
-					   (runtime_start - gd->relocaddr);
+					   map->physical_start + gd->relocaddr;
 
 			efi_runtime_relocate(new_offset, map);
 			/* Once we're virtual, we can no longer handle
-- 
2.12.3

             reply	other threads:[~2018-12-11  9:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-11  9:00 Alexander Graf [this message]
2018-12-11 11:52 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] efi_loader: Make RTS relocation more robust Heinrich Schuchardt
2018-12-11 16:13 ` Loic Devulder
2018-12-14  1:15 ` Jonathan Gray
2018-12-23  3:02 ` [U-Boot] [U-Boot, " Alexander Graf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181211090042.89935-1-agraf@suse.de \
    --to=agraf@suse.de \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox