From: Simon Goldschmidt <simon.k.r.goldschmidt@gmail.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v10 03/10] lib: lmb: reserving overlapping regions should fail
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 22:38:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190114213823.32486-4-simon.k.r.goldschmidt@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190114213823.32486-1-simon.k.r.goldschmidt@gmail.com>
lmb_add_region handles overlapping regions wrong: instead of merging
or rejecting to add a new reserved region that overlaps an existing
one, it just adds the new region.
Since internally the same function is used for lmb_alloc, change
lmb_add_region to reject overlapping regions.
Also, to keep reserved memory correct after 'free', reserved entries
created by allocating memory must not set their size to a multiple
of alignment but to the original size. This ensures the reserved
region is completely removed when the caller calls 'lmb_free', as
this one takes the same size as passed to 'lmb_alloc' etc.
Add test to assert this.
Signed-off-by: Simon Goldschmidt <simon.k.r.goldschmidt@gmail.com>
---
Changes in v10: None
Changes in v9: None
Changes in v8: None
Changes in v7:
- add braces around if/else with macros accross more than one line
Changes in v6:
- fix size of allocated regions that need alignment padding
Changes in v5:
- added a test for this bug
Changes in v4: None
Changes in v2: None
lib/lmb.c | 11 +++---
test/lib/lmb.c | 95 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
2 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/lmb.c b/lib/lmb.c
index 6d3dcf4e09..cd297f8202 100644
--- a/lib/lmb.c
+++ b/lib/lmb.c
@@ -131,6 +131,9 @@ static long lmb_add_region(struct lmb_region *rgn, phys_addr_t base, phys_size_t
rgn->region[i].size += size;
coalesced++;
break;
+ } else if (lmb_addrs_overlap(base, size, rgnbase, rgnsize)) {
+ /* regions overlap */
+ return -1;
}
}
@@ -269,11 +272,6 @@ static phys_addr_t lmb_align_down(phys_addr_t addr, phys_size_t size)
return addr & ~(size - 1);
}
-static phys_addr_t lmb_align_up(phys_addr_t addr, ulong size)
-{
- return (addr + (size - 1)) & ~(size - 1);
-}
-
phys_addr_t __lmb_alloc_base(struct lmb *lmb, phys_size_t size, ulong align, phys_addr_t max_addr)
{
long i, j;
@@ -302,8 +300,7 @@ phys_addr_t __lmb_alloc_base(struct lmb *lmb, phys_size_t size, ulong align, phy
if (j < 0) {
/* This area isn't reserved, take it */
if (lmb_add_region(&lmb->reserved, base,
- lmb_align_up(size,
- align)) < 0)
+ size) < 0)
return 0;
return base;
}
diff --git a/test/lib/lmb.c b/test/lib/lmb.c
index fb7ca45ef1..e6acb70e76 100644
--- a/test/lib/lmb.c
+++ b/test/lib/lmb.c
@@ -227,13 +227,16 @@ static int lib_test_lmb_big(struct unit_test_state *uts)
DM_TEST(lib_test_lmb_big, DM_TESTF_SCAN_PDATA | DM_TESTF_SCAN_FDT);
/* Simulate 512 MiB RAM, allocate a block without previous reservation */
-static int test_noreserved(struct unit_test_state *uts, const phys_addr_t ram)
+static int test_noreserved(struct unit_test_state *uts, const phys_addr_t ram,
+ const phys_addr_t alloc_size, const ulong align)
{
const phys_size_t ram_size = 0x20000000;
const phys_addr_t ram_end = ram + ram_size;
struct lmb lmb;
long ret;
phys_addr_t a, b;
+ const phys_addr_t alloc_size_aligned = (alloc_size + align - 1) &
+ ~(align - 1);
/* check for overflow */
ut_assert(ram_end == 0 || ram_end > ram);
@@ -242,20 +245,43 @@ static int test_noreserved(struct unit_test_state *uts, const phys_addr_t ram)
ret = lmb_add(&lmb, ram, ram_size);
ut_asserteq(ret, 0);
+ ASSERT_LMB(&lmb, ram, ram_size, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0);
/* allocate a block */
- a = lmb_alloc(&lmb, 4, 1);
+ a = lmb_alloc(&lmb, alloc_size, align);
ut_assert(a != 0);
- /* and free it */
- ret = lmb_free(&lmb, a, 4);
+ ASSERT_LMB(&lmb, ram, ram_size, 1, ram + ram_size - alloc_size_aligned,
+ alloc_size, 0, 0, 0, 0);
+ /* allocate another block */
+ b = lmb_alloc(&lmb, alloc_size, align);
+ ut_assert(b != 0);
+ if (alloc_size == alloc_size_aligned) {
+ ASSERT_LMB(&lmb, ram, ram_size, 1, ram + ram_size -
+ (alloc_size_aligned * 2), alloc_size * 2, 0, 0, 0,
+ 0);
+ } else {
+ ASSERT_LMB(&lmb, ram, ram_size, 2, ram + ram_size -
+ (alloc_size_aligned * 2), alloc_size, ram + ram_size
+ - alloc_size_aligned, alloc_size, 0, 0);
+ }
+ /* and free them */
+ ret = lmb_free(&lmb, b, alloc_size);
ut_asserteq(ret, 0);
+ ASSERT_LMB(&lmb, ram, ram_size, 1, ram + ram_size - alloc_size_aligned,
+ alloc_size, 0, 0, 0, 0);
+ ret = lmb_free(&lmb, a, alloc_size);
+ ut_asserteq(ret, 0);
+ ASSERT_LMB(&lmb, ram, ram_size, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0);
/* allocate a block with base*/
- b = lmb_alloc_base(&lmb, 4, 1, ram_end);
+ b = lmb_alloc_base(&lmb, alloc_size, align, ram_end);
ut_assert(a == b);
+ ASSERT_LMB(&lmb, ram, ram_size, 1, ram + ram_size - alloc_size_aligned,
+ alloc_size, 0, 0, 0, 0);
/* and free it */
- ret = lmb_free(&lmb, b, 4);
+ ret = lmb_free(&lmb, b, alloc_size);
ut_asserteq(ret, 0);
+ ASSERT_LMB(&lmb, ram, ram_size, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0);
return 0;
}
@@ -265,16 +291,30 @@ static int lib_test_lmb_noreserved(struct unit_test_state *uts)
int ret;
/* simulate 512 MiB RAM beginning at 1GiB */
- ret = test_noreserved(uts, 0x40000000);
+ ret = test_noreserved(uts, 0x40000000, 4, 1);
if (ret)
return ret;
/* simulate 512 MiB RAM beginning at 1.5GiB */
- return test_noreserved(uts, 0xE0000000);
+ return test_noreserved(uts, 0xE0000000, 4, 1);
}
DM_TEST(lib_test_lmb_noreserved, DM_TESTF_SCAN_PDATA | DM_TESTF_SCAN_FDT);
+static int lib_test_lmb_unaligned_size(struct unit_test_state *uts)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ /* simulate 512 MiB RAM beginning at 1GiB */
+ ret = test_noreserved(uts, 0x40000000, 5, 8);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ /* simulate 512 MiB RAM beginning at 1.5GiB */
+ return test_noreserved(uts, 0xE0000000, 5, 8);
+}
+
+DM_TEST(lib_test_lmb_unaligned_size, DM_TESTF_SCAN_PDATA | DM_TESTF_SCAN_FDT);
/*
* Simulate a RAM that starts at 0 and allocate down to address 0, which must
* fail as '0' means failure for the lmb_alloc functions.
@@ -318,3 +358,42 @@ static int lib_test_lmb_at_0(struct unit_test_state *uts)
}
DM_TEST(lib_test_lmb_at_0, DM_TESTF_SCAN_PDATA | DM_TESTF_SCAN_FDT);
+
+/* Check that calling lmb_reserve with overlapping regions fails. */
+static int lib_test_lmb_overlapping_reserve(struct unit_test_state *uts)
+{
+ const phys_addr_t ram = 0x40000000;
+ const phys_size_t ram_size = 0x20000000;
+ struct lmb lmb;
+ long ret;
+
+ lmb_init(&lmb);
+
+ ret = lmb_add(&lmb, ram, ram_size);
+ ut_asserteq(ret, 0);
+
+ ret = lmb_reserve(&lmb, 0x40010000, 0x10000);
+ ut_asserteq(ret, 0);
+ ASSERT_LMB(&lmb, ram, ram_size, 1, 0x40010000, 0x10000,
+ 0, 0, 0, 0);
+ /* allocate overlapping region should fail */
+ ret = lmb_reserve(&lmb, 0x40011000, 0x10000);
+ ut_asserteq(ret, -1);
+ ASSERT_LMB(&lmb, ram, ram_size, 1, 0x40010000, 0x10000,
+ 0, 0, 0, 0);
+ /* allocate 3nd region */
+ ret = lmb_reserve(&lmb, 0x40030000, 0x10000);
+ ut_asserteq(ret, 0);
+ ASSERT_LMB(&lmb, ram, ram_size, 2, 0x40010000, 0x10000,
+ 0x40030000, 0x10000, 0, 0);
+ /* allocate 2nd region */
+ ret = lmb_reserve(&lmb, 0x40020000, 0x10000);
+ ut_assert(ret >= 0);
+ ASSERT_LMB(&lmb, ram, ram_size, 1, 0x40010000, 0x30000,
+ 0, 0, 0, 0);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+DM_TEST(lib_test_lmb_overlapping_reserve,
+ DM_TESTF_SCAN_PDATA | DM_TESTF_SCAN_FDT);
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-14 21:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-14 21:38 [U-Boot] [PATCH v10 00/10] Fix CVE-2018-18440 and CVE-2018-18439 Simon Goldschmidt
2019-01-14 21:38 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v10 01/10] test: add test for lib/lmb.c Simon Goldschmidt
2019-01-17 22:44 ` [U-Boot] [U-Boot,v10,01/10] " Tom Rini
2019-01-14 21:38 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v10 02/10] lmb: fix allocation at end of address range Simon Goldschmidt
2019-01-16 21:34 ` Simon Glass
2019-01-17 22:44 ` [U-Boot] [U-Boot, v10, " Tom Rini
2019-01-14 21:38 ` Simon Goldschmidt [this message]
2019-01-16 21:34 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v10 03/10] lib: lmb: reserving overlapping regions should fail Simon Glass
2019-01-17 22:44 ` [U-Boot] [U-Boot, v10, " Tom Rini
2019-01-14 21:38 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v10 04/10] fdt: parse "reserved-memory" for memory reservation Simon Goldschmidt
2019-01-17 22:44 ` [U-Boot] [U-Boot, v10, " Tom Rini
2019-03-05 23:26 ` Eugeniu Rosca
2019-03-05 23:36 ` Marek Vasut
2019-01-14 21:38 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v10 05/10] lib: lmb: extend lmb for checks at load time Simon Goldschmidt
2019-01-16 21:34 ` Simon Glass
2019-01-16 21:44 ` Simon Goldschmidt
2019-01-16 21:49 ` Tom Rini
2019-01-16 21:51 ` Simon Glass
2019-01-17 22:44 ` [U-Boot] [U-Boot, v10, " Tom Rini
2019-01-14 21:38 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v10 06/10] fs: prevent overwriting reserved memory Simon Goldschmidt
2019-01-17 22:44 ` [U-Boot] [U-Boot, v10, " Tom Rini
2019-01-14 21:38 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v10 07/10] bootm: use new common function lmb_init_and_reserve Simon Goldschmidt
2019-01-17 22:44 ` [U-Boot] [U-Boot, v10, " Tom Rini
2019-01-14 21:38 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v10 08/10] lmb: remove unused extern declaration Simon Goldschmidt
2019-01-16 21:34 ` Simon Glass
2019-01-17 22:44 ` [U-Boot] [U-Boot, v10, " Tom Rini
2019-01-14 21:38 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v10 09/10] tftp: prevent overwriting reserved memory Simon Goldschmidt
2019-01-17 22:44 ` [U-Boot] [U-Boot, v10, " Tom Rini
2019-01-26 3:20 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2019-01-26 8:46 ` Simon Goldschmidt
2019-01-26 9:56 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2019-01-26 13:25 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2019-01-26 21:20 ` Simon Goldschmidt
2019-01-26 13:17 ` Tom Rini
2019-01-26 21:15 ` Simon Goldschmidt
2019-01-14 21:38 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v10 10/10] arm: bootm: fix sp detection at end of address range Simon Goldschmidt
2019-01-17 22:44 ` [U-Boot] [U-Boot, v10, " Tom Rini
2019-01-14 22:54 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v10 00/10] Fix CVE-2018-18440 and CVE-2018-18439 Tom Rini
2019-01-15 5:08 ` Simon Goldschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190114213823.32486-4-simon.k.r.goldschmidt@gmail.com \
--to=simon.k.r.goldschmidt@gmail.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox