public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [RFC 4/8] cmd: bootefi: move do_bootefi_bootmgr_exec() forward
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 11:16:35 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190322021634.GN9937@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <92c0ca2c-cd99-9790-b6d2-42c3095b3dd6@gmx.de>

On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 12:48:53PM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 3/5/19 6:53 AM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> > This is a preparatory patch.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
> > ---
> >  cmd/bootefi.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> >  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/cmd/bootefi.c b/cmd/bootefi.c
> > index 3619a20e6433..1d90e7b4b575 100644
> > --- a/cmd/bootefi.c
> > +++ b/cmd/bootefi.c
> > @@ -314,6 +314,27 @@ err_add_protocol:
> >  	return ret;
> >  }
> >
> > +static int do_bootefi_bootmgr_exec(void)
> > +{
> > +	struct efi_device_path *device_path, *file_path;
> > +	void *addr;
> > +	efi_status_t r;
> > +
> > +	addr = efi_bootmgr_load(&device_path, &file_path);
> > +	if (!addr)
> > +		return 1;
> > +
> > +	printf("## Starting EFI application at %p ...\n", addr);
> > +	r = do_bootefi_exec(addr, device_path, file_path);
> > +	printf("## Application terminated, r = %lu\n",
> > +	       r & ~EFI_ERROR_MASK);
> > +	if (r != EFI_SUCCESS)
> > +		return 1;
> 
> return CMD_RET_FAILURE ?
> 
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> 
> return CMD_RET_SUCCESS ?
> 
> The lines following efi_bootmgr_load() are duplicating code from
> do_bootefi().

do_bootefi() -> do_boot_efi()?

> The patch itself is ok. But in the patch series we should get rid of the
> duplication.

We only share:
> > +	printf("## Starting EFI application at %p ...\n", addr);
> > +	r = do_bootefi_exec(addr, device_path, file_path);
> > +	printf("## Application terminated, r = %lu\n",
> > +	       r & ~EFI_ERROR_MASK);
> > +	if (r != EFI_SUCCESS)
> > +		return 1;

Can we call it a duplication?
# I don't like the print messages here anyway.

-Takahiro Akashi

> Best regards
> 
> Heinrich
> 
> > +}
> > +
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_CMD_BOOTEFI_SELFTEST
> >  /**
> >   * bootefi_test_prepare() - prepare to run an EFI test
> > @@ -362,27 +383,6 @@ failure:
> >
> >  #endif /* CONFIG_CMD_BOOTEFI_SELFTEST */
> >
> > -static int do_bootefi_bootmgr_exec(void)
> > -{
> > -	struct efi_device_path *device_path, *file_path;
> > -	void *addr;
> > -	efi_status_t r;
> > -
> > -	addr = efi_bootmgr_load(&device_path, &file_path);
> > -	if (!addr)
> > -		return 1;
> > -
> > -	printf("## Starting EFI application at %p ...\n", addr);
> > -	r = do_bootefi_exec(addr, device_path, file_path);
> > -	printf("## Application terminated, r = %lu\n",
> > -	       r & ~EFI_ERROR_MASK);
> > -
> > -	if (r != EFI_SUCCESS)
> > -		return 1;
> > -
> > -	return 0;
> > -}
> > -
> >  /* Interpreter command to boot an arbitrary EFI image from memory */
> >  static int do_bootefi(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag, int argc, char * const argv[])
> >  {
> >
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2019-03-22  2:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-05  5:53 [U-Boot] [RFC 0/8] efi_loader: rework bootefi/bootmgr AKASHI Takahiro
2019-03-05  5:53 ` [U-Boot] [RFC 1/8] efi_loader: boottime: don't add device path protocol to image handle AKASHI Takahiro
2019-03-05 19:48   ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2019-03-06  0:27     ` AKASHI Takahiro
2019-03-06  5:04       ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2019-03-06  5:29         ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2019-03-27  2:50           ` AKASHI Takahiro
2019-03-05  5:53 ` [U-Boot] [RFC 2/8] efi_loader: boottime: export efi_[un]load_image() AKASHI Takahiro
2019-03-05 20:02   ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2019-03-05  5:53 ` [U-Boot] [RFC 3/8] efi_loader: bootmgr: return pointer and size of buffer in loading AKASHI Takahiro
2019-03-21 11:41   ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2019-03-22  2:08     ` AKASHI Takahiro
2019-03-05  5:53 ` [U-Boot] [RFC 4/8] cmd: bootefi: move do_bootefi_bootmgr_exec() forward AKASHI Takahiro
2019-03-21 11:48   ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2019-03-22  2:16     ` AKASHI Takahiro [this message]
2019-03-05  5:53 ` [U-Boot] [RFC 5/8] cmd: bootefi: carve out fdt handling AKASHI Takahiro
2019-03-05  5:53 ` [U-Boot] [RFC 6/8] cmd: bootefi: carve out efi_selftest code from do_bootefi() AKASHI Takahiro
2019-03-05  5:53 ` [U-Boot] [RFC 7/8] cmd: bootefi: rework do_bootefi(), using load_image API AKASHI Takahiro
2019-03-05  5:53 ` [U-Boot] [RFC 8/8] cmd: add efibootmgr command AKASHI Takahiro
2019-03-19  7:23 ` [U-Boot] [RFC 0/8] efi_loader: rework bootefi/bootmgr AKASHI Takahiro
2019-03-21  6:41   ` Heinrich Schuchardt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190322021634.GN9937@linaro.org \
    --to=takahiro.akashi@linaro.org \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox