[U-Boot] [EXT] Re: [PATCH 4/6] spl: mmc: support loading i.MX container format file

[Lukasz Majewski <lukma@denx.de>]

On Thu, 6 Jun 2019 02:33:14 +0000
Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com> wrote:

> > Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/6] spl: mmc: support
> > loading i.MX container format file
> > 
> > On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 03:24:40PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:  
> > > On 6/5/19 5:03 AM, Peng Fan wrote:
> > > [...]  
> > > >>>>> It is not duplication of FIT. Container support the similar
> > > >>>>> function of FIT image, but it is not only that.  
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> So what is it ?  
> > > >>>
> > > >>>  
> > > >>  
> > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.  
> > > >>>  
> > > >>  
> > nxp.com%2Fdocs%2Fen%2Freference-manual%2FIMX8DQXPRM.pdf&amp;da  
> > > >> ta=02%7C  
> > > >>>  
> > > >>  
> > 01%7Cpeng.fan%40nxp.com%7C72216052f4234a93ad1f08d6e95ed782%7C6  
> > > >> 86ea1d3b  
> > > >>>  
> > > >>  
> > c2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C1%7C636952990895125305&amp;sdat  
> > > >> a=KO%2B0e  
> > > >>>  
> > > >>  
> > E3v%2FkHuJ%2BhR7mBgc4NWXxbMUupfubXXu%2BueIWo%3D&amp;reserv  
> > > >> ed=0  
> > > >>> Chapter 5 has information about container set and container.  
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks, any specific part of those 80 pages ?  
> > > >
> > > > Figure 5-24. Container Format has a picture about a single
> > > > container. i.MX8 container also support container sets, support
> > > > encrypt blob, certificates, SRK management. Support signature
> > > > to the whole container, no need single image inside container.  
> > >
> > > Isn't that all supported in fitImage too ?  
> > 
> > This is neither the first nor last time functionality has been
> > essentially duplicated, sadly, for reasons.  
> 
> I'll share the fit things to our ROM stakeholders, but they take
> decision on new SoC design.
> 
> >   
> > > >>>> I don't think I get it. Why would I, as an iMX8 user, want to
> > > >>>> pick custom new vendor-specific format over years-proven
> > > >>>> generic  
> > fitImage?  
> > > >>>
> > > >>> We not against FIT, we already use FIT on i.MX8M, to let spl
> > > >>> to authenticate FIT image using ROM HAB, not using crypto
> > > >>> driver.  
> > > >>
> > > >> Great
> > > >>  
> > > >>>> What is the selling point here ?  
> > > >>>
> > > >>> We would not introduce cypto driver in SPL stage, that means
> > > >>> HAB FIT and AHAB container needs to be dropped when SPL
> > > >>> loading other  
> > images.  
> > > >>> ROM already provides API for bootloader to authenticate
> > > >>> images, introducing complex crypto driver in SPL could
> > > >>> enlarge code size and make things complicated.  
> > > >>
> > > >> Ah I see, so it's all making the whole crypto simpler by
> > > >> offloading the hard parts into the firmware, which just
> > > >> magically handles everything , without having much extra code
> > > >> in the SPL ?  
> > > >
> > > > Yes. Use what ROM provides will make things easier for U-Boot.  
> > >
> > > Is it possible to perform a security audit on the ROM as easily
> > > as on U-Boot ? I mean, U-Boot is free software, the source is
> > > available, so security researchers can easily scrutinize it. Is
> > > the ROM ?  
> > 
> > So, here's my two cents (and it may or may not seem contradictory
> > with my opinions in the secure boot thread going on currently on
> > the Linaro Boot Architecture list).  Yes, it would and IMHO is
> > better when we use free and open software to solve our problems
> > (and an aside to the RISC-V folks as this is yet another area they
> > can make the world a better place in).  But I am a believe in
> > dealing with the world as it stands at times too.  The question
> > isn't "can we get NXP to re-spin i.MX8 to use the FIT image
> > format?" as that's obviously going to be "No.".  The question is,
> > "can we support this format in a clean manner?" and the answer is
> > obviously "Yes.".  So please lets keep that in mind with reviewing
> > the code as at the end of the day it is more beneficial for this to
> > be supported in mainline U-Boot than only supported in the vendor
> > tree.  
> 
> Thanks. So I think you agree the current approach. Could I get any
> A-b or R-b tags from the list?

Just to add my 2 cents...

Please if possible provide a good (and as much verbose as possible)
entry to ./doc/README.imx_image (or something) regarding the i.MX8
format.

Thanks in advance,

> 
> Thanks,
> Peng.
> 
> > Thanks!
> > 
> > --
> > Tom  




Best regards,

Lukasz Majewski

--

DENX Software Engineering GmbH,      Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-59 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: lukma at denx.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20190606/f1e73b6d/attachment.sig>