public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] U-Boot: Environment flags broken for U-Boot
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2019 10:04:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190903080442.80BC7240049@gemini.denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a78f0b04-c3f7-45d5-e9ac-90522dbefc2e@denx.de>

Dear Tom,

In message <a78f0b04-c3f7-45d5-e9ac-90522dbefc2e@denx.de> Heiko Schocher wrote:
> 
> I am just testing U-Boot Environment flags and they do not work anymore with
> current mainline U-Boot ... 
...
> reason is your commit:
> 
> commit 7d4776545b0f8a8827e5d061206faf61c9ba6ea9
> Author: Patrick Delaunay <patrick.delaunay@st.com>
> Date:   Thu Apr 18 17:32:49 2019 +0200
> 
>      env: solve compilation error in SPL


Looking into the history of this, I wonder if we could / should
have prevented this.

As far as I can see, Patrick's patch series has not been reviewed by
others, probably because general intetest in STM32 is not that big
at the moment.  I can see no Acked-by:, Reviewed-by: nor Tested-by:
tags - nothing.

The whole patch series was then pulled from the u-boot-stm
repository.


However, there was not only STM related code in there.  There were
changes to common code like the environment handling.  common code
was changed without review and without testing.


Are there ways to prevent this?

Yes, we can appeal to the custodians to be more careful, but I
assume they are already doing their best.

It might have even been better if this had been a sub-system with a
clear maintainer, but there is no such person for the environment
code.

How can we prevent this in the future?

Should we define "interested developers" for such areas that have no
custodian (the "Designated reviewer") entry in the MAINTAINERS file
could be used for this, for example)?

Better ideas?

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,      Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
To make this work we'd need a patch, as nobody of us tests this.
- L. Poettering in https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=74589

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-09-03  8:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-02 14:03 [U-Boot] U-Boot: Environment flags broken for U-Boot Heiko Schocher
2019-09-02 15:35 ` Patrick DELAUNAY
2019-09-03  4:44   ` Heiko Schocher
2019-09-03 14:04     ` Patrick DELAUNAY
2019-09-03  8:04 ` Wolfgang Denk [this message]
2019-09-03 23:03   ` Joe Hershberger
2019-09-04  5:05     ` Heiko Schocher
2019-09-04 18:49     ` Tom Rini
2019-09-04 18:00   ` Tom Rini
2019-09-04 18:30     ` Joe Hershberger
2019-09-09 21:01       ` Tom Rini
2019-09-10  8:29         ` Wolfgang Denk
2019-09-10 12:54           ` Tom Rini
2019-09-10 14:11             ` Joe Hershberger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190903080442.80BC7240049@gemini.denx.de \
    --to=wd@denx.de \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox