From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tom Rini Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 21:43:13 -0500 Subject: [U-Boot] =?utf-8?q?=5BPATCH_v2=5D_travis=3A_move_orangepi_to_vend?= =?utf-8?b?b3Igam9i44CQ6K+35rOo5oSP77yM6YKu5Lu255SxdS1ib290LWJvdW5jZXNA?= =?utf-8?b?bGlzdHMuZGVueC5kZeS7o+WPkeOAkQ==?= In-Reply-To: <2bd139b2-0ab8-d1b3-9b06-08027a9ace21@rock-chips.com> References: <20191121055012.3749804-1-hs@denx.de> <2bd139b2-0ab8-d1b3-9b06-08027a9ace21@rock-chips.com> Message-ID: <20191122024313.GZ971@bill-the-cat> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 09:47:46AM +0800, Kever Yang wrote: > Hi Heiko, > > On 2019/11/21 下午1:50, Heiko Schocher wrote: > > move orangepi builds into a new job, > > Why this is needed? You can use 'buildman orangepi' locally, but I can't > understand why this need to be a separate job on Travis. Because the sun8i 32bit build job exceeded the travis build time limit, as sometimes happens > > and exclude > > orangepi builds from sunxi and rockchip jobs. > > > If people want to use buildman with sunxi or rockchip, I think it would like > to build all the boards with the SoC from vendor, so it would be better to > keep the board build in sunxi/rockchip jobs. > > The travis jobs are sort by soc vendor or SoC, no board vendor, if add an > orangepi and remove it from sunxi and rockchip, there will be more board > vendor and do the same, seems like jobs for the soc and vendor class are > broken. Note that we have a number of other board-vendor jobs, this is not the first one. If this is too contentious, this travis failure is not frequent and we can just drop this I suppose. -- Tom -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: