From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tom Rini Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2019 18:58:40 -0500 Subject: [PATCH v2 00/16] efi_loader: add secure boot support In-Reply-To: <20191204082858.GX22427@linaro.org> References: <20191126005120.31156-1-takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> <20191204024314.GW22427@linaro.org> <29c8db0b-15eb-7285-dc72-0de54f2cbe12@gmx.de> <20191204082858.GX22427@linaro.org> Message-ID: <20191204235840.GG9549@bill-the-cat> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 05:28:59PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 08:31:26AM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > > On 12/4/19 3:43 AM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > > >Tom, Simon, Heinrich, > > > > > >I have submitted three major patch sets for UEFI secure boot: > > >* x509/pkcs7 parser > > >* RSA library extension > > >* UEFI secure boot > > > > > >I have no technical issues to fix now and have seen only a few minor > > >comments on them (if I confirm that you have no more comments, > > >I can submit new version almost immediately). > > >Considering those, can I expect that those patches be merged > > >in v2020.01? > > > > > >If not, do you need to have more time for your reviewing? > > >What else do you expect from my side to accelerate the upstream? > > > > We are reaching the end of the release cycle. So do not expect any of > > these patch series to be merged in v2020.01. > > cf. https://www.denx.de/wiki/U-Boot/ReleaseCycle > > I have often seen several patches (not bug fix) merged > even after "merge window". > Anyway, Please keep pushing back on me when you see "large" changes go in later than probably should. I try and hold to what I say, but I don't always make it. > > To my understanding the UEFI secure boot series depends on the other two > > so it must be merged last. > > So once the first two patch set are accepted by the maintainers, > do you agree to merging the third one (i.e. secure boot patch itself) > promptly? > -> Heinrich > > As I said, I have had no technical issues on the first two patches > and haven't heard any comments/objections from the maintainers so far. > Are you willing to accept them for the next release? > -> Tom, Simon My hope is to put some of this in to -next and see what comes out. As I send this I'm doing what I hope will be a last test of the MTD clean up series, which has been what's eating all of my "try something" cycles since the end of Oct. -- Tom -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: