From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tom Rini Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 20:54:12 -0500 Subject: [PATCH v2 00/16] efi_loader: add secure boot support In-Reply-To: <20191211004155.GC22427@linaro.org> References: <20191126005120.31156-1-takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> <20191204024314.GW22427@linaro.org> <29c8db0b-15eb-7285-dc72-0de54f2cbe12@gmx.de> <20191204082858.GX22427@linaro.org> <20191211004155.GC22427@linaro.org> Message-ID: <20191211015412.GX9549@bill-the-cat> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 09:41:56AM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > Simon, > > On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 05:28:59PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 08:31:26AM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > > > On 12/4/19 3:43 AM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > > > >Tom, Simon, Heinrich, > > > > > > > >I have submitted three major patch sets for UEFI secure boot: > > > >* x509/pkcs7 parser > > > >* RSA library extension > > > >* UEFI secure boot > > > > > > > >I have no technical issues to fix now and have seen only a few minor > > > >comments on them (if I confirm that you have no more comments, > > > >I can submit new version almost immediately). > > > >Considering those, can I expect that those patches be merged > > > >in v2020.01? > > > > > > > >If not, do you need to have more time for your reviewing? > > > >What else do you expect from my side to accelerate the upstream? > > > > > > We are reaching the end of the release cycle. So do not expect any of > > > these patch series to be merged in v2020.01. > > > cf. https://www.denx.de/wiki/U-Boot/ReleaseCycle > > > > I have often seen several patches (not bug fix) merged > > even after "merge window". > > Anyway, > > > > > To my understanding the UEFI secure boot series depends on the other two > > > so it must be merged last. > > > > So once the first two patch set are accepted by the maintainers, > > do you agree to merging the third one (i.e. secure boot patch itself) > > promptly? > > -> Heinrich > > > > As I said, I have had no technical issues on the first two patches > > and haven't heard any comments/objections from the maintainers so far. > > Are you willing to accept them for the next release? > > -> Tom, Simon > > Can you confirm that you have queued my "RSA library extension" patch > in your -next(?) branch, please? Please note that I raised a concern with the RSA patch series that needs to be addressed. There's unexplained / unexpected size growth on platforms that aren't otherwise enabling new features. Thanks! -- Tom -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: