From: Lukasz Majewski <lukma@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [RFT PATCH v1 1/5] Revert "usb: ehci-hcd: Keep async schedule running"
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 08:06:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200324080617.7d979d09@jawa> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f9da5f40-2567-2a29-2dec-6448b46a681e@denx.de>
Hi Marek,
> On 3/23/20 1:41 PM, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> > Hi Marek,
>
> Hi,
>
> >> On 3/23/20 7:57 AM, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> >>> Hi Marek,
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >>>> On 3/22/20 2:00 PM, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> >>>>> This reverts commit 02b0e1a36c5bc20174299312556ec4e266872bd6.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <lukma@denx.de>
> >>>>
> >>>> This patch lacks any and all explanation why this is being
> >>>> reverted. The patch you are reverting here explains why it was
> >>>> added and what real issues it was fixing, so instead of reverting
> >>>> it, if there is an issue with that patch, you should identify the
> >>>> issue and fix it.
> >>>
> >>> Marek, have you received the cover letter for this patch series?
> >>>
> >>> In the cover letter I've written the rationale for reverting this
> >>> patch.
> >>
> >> That should have been explained in this patch description.
> >>
> >>> In short - qhtoken has value of 0x0, when the token variable shows
> >>> errors. As a result the error handling is broken.
> >>> Could you comment on those arguments?
> >>
> >> Maybe you are referencing/reading the wrong token ?
> >
> > I'm printing the token which is used afterwards for reacting on
> > possible errors.
> >
> >>
> >> You should probably figure out why this doesn't work first and then
> >> add fixes on top.
> >
> > Haven't you seen such problem during code development on your setup
> > when developing this patch?
>
> During the development of the patch, I don't remember, sorry. I most
> certainly saw various failure modes, however those should not be
> present mainline.
The issue is that the qhtoken is not updated at all.
Maybe you remember - is Linux using async setup by default (as
introduced in SHA1: 02b0e1a36c5bc20174299312556ec4e266872bd6) ?
>
> I tested this patch with the problematic USB sticks on R-Car Gen3 and
> with SMSC95xx USB ethernet adapter last weekend and I didn't see a
> problem.
Ok.
For i.MX6Q:
The SHA1: 02b0e1a36c5bc20174299312556ec4e266872bd6 patch causes the
iMX6Q to fail after a few minutes of testing. General in i.MX6Q the
usb is NOT robust at all.
For i.MX53:
With patch 02b0e1a36c5bc20174299312556ec4e266872bd6 applied it also
breaks after a few minutes.
With this patch series applied it works for 2 days now without any
issue.
Best regards,
Lukasz Majewski
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-59 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: lukma at denx.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20200324/717bba31/attachment.sig>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-24 7:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-22 13:00 [RFT PATCH v1 0/5] usb: Improve robustness of ehci-hcd controller operation Lukasz Majewski
2020-03-22 13:00 ` [RFT PATCH v1 1/5] Revert "usb: ehci-hcd: Keep async schedule running" Lukasz Majewski
2020-03-22 13:18 ` Marek Vasut
2020-03-23 6:57 ` Lukasz Majewski
2020-03-23 11:46 ` Marek Vasut
2020-03-23 12:41 ` Lukasz Majewski
2020-03-24 0:58 ` Marek Vasut
2020-03-24 7:06 ` Lukasz Majewski [this message]
2020-03-24 15:07 ` Marek Vasut
2020-03-24 18:11 ` Lukasz Majewski
2020-03-24 18:33 ` Marek Vasut
2020-03-22 13:00 ` [RFT PATCH v1 2/5] usb: Handle XACTERR error in DATA phase of USB storage Lukasz Majewski
2020-03-22 13:23 ` Marek Vasut
2020-03-23 7:00 ` Lukasz Majewski
2020-03-23 11:50 ` Marek Vasut
2020-03-23 13:03 ` Lukasz Majewski
2020-03-24 1:01 ` Marek Vasut
2020-03-22 13:00 ` [RFT PATCH v1 3/5] usb: Add some delay to wait for slow USB devices to be operational Lukasz Majewski
2020-03-22 13:29 ` Marek Vasut
2020-03-23 7:04 ` Lukasz Majewski
2020-03-23 11:52 ` Marek Vasut
2020-03-22 13:00 ` [RFT PATCH v1 4/5] usb: Provide code to handle spinup of USB usb devices (mostly HDDs) Lukasz Majewski
2020-03-22 13:32 ` Marek Vasut
2020-03-23 7:53 ` Lukasz Majewski
2020-03-23 11:57 ` Marek Vasut
2020-03-23 12:54 ` Lukasz Majewski
2020-03-24 1:04 ` Marek Vasut
2020-03-22 13:00 ` [RFT PATCH v1 5/5] usb: Handle QT_TOKEN_STATUS_XACTERR error when sending data Lukasz Majewski
2020-03-22 13:45 ` Marek Vasut
2020-03-23 7:18 ` Lukasz Majewski
2020-03-23 11:59 ` Marek Vasut
2020-03-23 12:58 ` Lukasz Majewski
2020-03-24 1:06 ` Marek Vasut
2020-03-23 20:58 ` [RFT PATCH v1 0/5] usb: Improve robustness of ehci-hcd controller operation Tom Rini
2020-03-23 22:11 ` Lukasz Majewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200324080617.7d979d09@jawa \
--to=lukma@denx.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox