From: Marek Behun <marek.behun@nic.cz>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [PATCH U-BOOT v2 2/3] fs: btrfs: Reject fs with sector size other than PAGE_SIZE
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 10:03:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200326100312.32cbae6f@nic.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200326053556.20492-3-wqu@suse.com>
On Thu, 26 Mar 2020 13:35:55 +0800
Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> wrote:
> Although in theory u-boot fs driver could easily support more sector
> sizes, current code base doesn't have good enough way to grab sector
> size yet.
>
> This would cause problem for later LZO fixes which rely on sector size.
>
> And considering that most u-boot boards are using 4K page size, which is
> also the most common sector size for btrfs, rejecting fs with
> non-page-sized sector size shouldn't cause much problem.
>
> This should only be a quick fix before we implement better sector size
> support.
>
> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
> Cc: Marek Behun <marek.behun@nic.cz>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/super.c | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/super.c b/fs/btrfs/super.c
> index 2dc4a6fcd7a3..b693a073fc0b 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/super.c
> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
>
> #include "btrfs.h"
> #include <memalign.h>
> +#include <linux/compat.h>
>
> #define BTRFS_SUPER_FLAG_SUPP (BTRFS_HEADER_FLAG_WRITTEN \
> | BTRFS_HEADER_FLAG_RELOC \
> @@ -232,6 +233,13 @@ int btrfs_read_superblock(void)
> return -1;
> }
>
> + if (sb->sectorsize != PAGE_SIZE) {
> + printf(
> + "%s: Unsupported sector size (%u), only supports %u as sector size\n",
> + __func__, sb->sectorsize, PAGE_SIZE);
> + return -1;
> + }
> +
> if (btrfs_info.sb.num_devices != 1) {
> printf("%s: Unsupported number of devices (%lli). This driver "
> "only supports filesystem on one device.\n", __func__,
Reviewed-by: Marek Beh?n <marek.behun@nic.cz>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-26 9:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-26 5:35 [PATCH U-BOOT v2 0/3] fs: btrfs: Fix false LZO decompression error due to missing page boundary check Qu Wenruo
2020-03-26 5:35 ` [PATCH U-BOOT v2 1/3] fs: btrfs: Use LZO_LEN to replace immediate number Qu Wenruo
2020-03-26 9:02 ` Marek Behun
2020-04-17 21:08 ` Tom Rini
2020-03-26 5:35 ` [PATCH U-BOOT v2 2/3] fs: btrfs: Reject fs with sector size other than PAGE_SIZE Qu Wenruo
2020-03-26 9:03 ` Marek Behun [this message]
2020-04-17 21:09 ` Tom Rini
2020-03-26 5:35 ` [PATCH U-BOOT v2 3/3] fs: btrfs: Fix LZO false decompression error caused by pending zero Qu Wenruo
2020-03-26 9:03 ` Marek Behun
2020-04-17 21:09 ` Tom Rini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200326100312.32cbae6f@nic.cz \
--to=marek.behun@nic.cz \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox