[PATCH v1 5/7] arm: dts: s700: add node for ethernet controller

[Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>]

On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 03:53:55PM +0100, Andr? Przywara wrote:
> On 12/05/2020 15:25, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 03:18:33PM +0100, Andr? Przywara wrote:
> >> On 09/05/2020 15:25, Amit Singh Tomar wrote:
> >>> This patch adds node for ethernet controller found on Action Semi OWL
> >>> S700 SoC.
> >>>
> >>> Since, there is no upstream Linux binding exist for S700 ethernet
> >>> controller, Changes are put in u-boot specific dtsi file.
> >>
> >> But that should not be the S700 SoC .dtsi, instead the cubieboard .dts
> >> file, since you specify the PHY mode in here (which is board specific).
> > 
> > The general way to move forward here is that bindings should be getting
> > proposed to Linux and accepted there, and U-Boot can take a WIP of them,
> > that gets updated later on to match, but we shouldn't get it here first.
> 
> Yes, this is of course a stop-gap measure, but a useful one: Being able
> to TFTP a kernel helps with developing the kernel port, especially since
> U-Boot doesn't support MMC (yet).
> And there are easier things than pushing a DT binding into the kernel
> tree without having a Linux driver ready ...

So, we're at -rc2 for v2020.07.  The DDR calculation stuff I can see
getting pulled in.  Is the ethernet driver for this SoC so far from done
that it's not ready for linux-next?  Things don't have to be in mainline
proper, but the expectation is that it's making reasonable progress
there and been reviewed so that binding changes between what we take in
U-Boot at first and a final re-sync once it is in mainline are minimal.

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 659 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20200512/fffdc39f/attachment.sig>