[PATCH] net: dwc_eth_qos: add Kconfig option to select supported configuration

[Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>]

On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 10:46:23PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 6/10/20 10:11 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> [...]
> >>>>> You mean be more like barebox and Linux where the board-specific stuff
> >>>>> is kicked up one level and we have a more generic binary?  I don't know
> >>>>> and there's so much work that would be required before having to move
> >>>>> this from a Kconfig choice to just Kconfig options I don't see that as
> >>>>> being a relevant question here.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Or did I misunderstand the question?
> >>>>
> >>>> More like automatically have a Kconfig option generate it's _SPL and
> >>>> _TPL variant.
> >>>
> >>> Ah.  Well, that is rephrasing my first question.  Would it ever make
> >>> sense to have more than one of these enabled?
> >>
> >> For some sort of universal SPL, maybe ?
> > 
> > So no, there's not a reason today then and it should be a choice.
> 
> Can you provide some more detailed explanation why we shouldn't generate
> _SPL and _TPL variants of Kconfig entries for all Kconfig entries ? It
> would make things much simpler and permit configuring SPL/TPL the same
> way U-Boot is configured, with their own set of options.

In the context of this particular thread?  I don't see how it's helpful
to say 3 times that we're in fact building for Tegra or STM32 or SoCFPGA
when you can't build something that runs on more than one of those.

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 659 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20200610/34a1515a/attachment.sig>