From: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [PATCH v2 08/17] efi_loader: signature: fix a size check against revocation list
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2020 10:12:38 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200708011238.GA16575@laputa> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <84643027-6db0-db8e-f9bf-f9c21817f680@gmx.de>
On Fri, Jul 03, 2020 at 01:00:21PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 09.06.20 07:09, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> > Since the size check against an entry in efi_search_siglist() is
> > incorrect, this function will never find out a to-be-matched certificate
> > and its associated revocation time in the signature list.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > lib/efi_loader/efi_signature.c | 5 +++--
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/efi_signature.c b/lib/efi_loader/efi_signature.c
> > index a05c75472721..f22dc151971f 100644
> > --- a/lib/efi_loader/efi_signature.c
> > +++ b/lib/efi_loader/efi_signature.c
> > @@ -434,10 +434,11 @@ static bool efi_search_siglist(struct x509_certificate *cert,
> > * time64_t revocation_time;
> > * };
> > */
> > - if ((sig_data->size == SHA256_SUM_LEN) &&
> > - !memcmp(sig_data->data, hash, SHA256_SUM_LEN)) {
> > + if ((sig_data->size >= SHA256_SUM_LEN + sizeof(time64_t)) &&
> > + !memcmp(sig_data->data, msg, SHA256_SUM_LEN)) {
> > memcpy(revoc_time, sig_data->data + SHA256_SUM_LEN,
> > sizeof(*revoc_time));
> > + EFI_PRINT("revocation time: %llu\n", *revoc_time);
>
> *revoc_time is of type __s64. So this must be %lld. Cf.
>
> include/linux/time.h:156
I know that because I added the definition.
Interestingly, linux added another type, timeu64_t, later on
to avoid an overflow in some calculation.
While I don't think the current format is harmful, I will change it.
-Takahiro Akashi
> Best regards
>
> Heinrich
>
> > found = true;
> > goto out;
> > }
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-08 1:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-09 5:09 [PATCH v2 00/17] efi_loader: rework/improve UEFI secure boot code AKASHI Takahiro
2020-06-09 5:09 ` [PATCH v2 01/17] efi_loader: change efi objects initialization order AKASHI Takahiro
2020-07-03 10:29 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2020-06-09 5:09 ` [PATCH v2 02/17] Revert "test: stabilize test_efi_secboot" AKASHI Takahiro
2020-07-03 10:30 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2020-06-09 5:09 ` [PATCH v2 03/17] efi_loader: signature: replace debug to EFI_PRINT AKASHI Takahiro
2020-07-03 10:30 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2020-06-09 5:09 ` [PATCH v2 04/17] efi_loader: variable: " AKASHI Takahiro
2020-06-09 5:09 ` [PATCH v2 05/17] efi_loader: image_loader: " AKASHI Takahiro
2020-07-03 10:38 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2020-06-09 5:09 ` [PATCH v2 06/17] efi_loader: image_loader: add a check against certificate type of authenticode AKASHI Takahiro
2020-07-03 10:56 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2020-07-08 1:08 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2020-06-09 5:09 ` [PATCH v2 07/17] efi_loader: image_loader: retrieve authenticode only if it exists AKASHI Takahiro
2020-06-09 5:09 ` [PATCH v2 08/17] efi_loader: signature: fix a size check against revocation list AKASHI Takahiro
2020-07-03 11:00 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2020-07-08 1:12 ` AKASHI Takahiro [this message]
2020-07-08 1:30 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2020-06-09 5:09 ` [PATCH v2 09/17] efi_loader: signature: make efi_hash_regions more generic AKASHI Takahiro
2020-07-03 11:08 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2020-07-08 1:22 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2020-06-09 5:09 ` [PATCH v2 10/17] efi_loader: image_loader: verification for all signatures should pass AKASHI Takahiro
2020-06-09 7:14 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2020-06-09 5:09 ` [PATCH v2 11/17] efi_loader: image_loader: add digest-based verification for signed image AKASHI Takahiro
2020-06-09 5:09 ` [PATCH v2 12/17] test/py: efi_secboot: remove all "re.search" AKASHI Takahiro
2020-07-03 15:52 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2020-06-09 5:09 ` [PATCH v2 13/17] test/py: efi_secboot: fix test case 1g of test_authvar AKASHI Takahiro
2020-07-03 16:08 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2020-06-09 5:09 ` [PATCH v2 14/17] test/py: efi_secboot: split "signed image" test case-1 into two cases AKASHI Takahiro
2020-07-03 16:14 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2020-06-09 5:09 ` [PATCH v2 15/17] test/py: efi_secboot: add a test against certificate revocation AKASHI Takahiro
2020-06-09 5:09 ` [PATCH v2 16/17] test/py: efi_secboot: add a test for multiple signatures AKASHI Takahiro
2020-06-09 5:09 ` [PATCH v2 17/17] test/py: efi_secboot: add a test for verifying with digest of signed image AKASHI Takahiro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200708011238.GA16575@laputa \
--to=takahiro.akashi@linaro.org \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox