From: Leo Liang <ycliang@andestech.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [PATCH] riscv: Only enable OF_BOARD_FIXUP for S-Mode
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 17:41:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200916094132.GA25540@andestech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f722dc29-df82-7a6a-6e77-d28e55a82306@gmail.com>
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 07:57:04AM -0400, Sean Anderson wrote:
> On 9/14/20 2:38 AM, Bin Meng wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 2:25 AM Sean Anderson <seanga2@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 9/11/20 10:43 AM, Bin Meng wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 6:20 PM Sean Anderson <seanga2@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On 9/11/20 3:29 AM, Bin Meng wrote:
> >>>>> Hi Sean,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Sat, Sep 5, 2020 at 9:22 PM Sean Anderson <seanga2@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> It is unsafe to enable OF_BOARD_FIXUP only based on OF_SEPARATE.
> >>>>>> OF_SEPARATE may indicate that the user wishes U-Boot to use a different
> >>>>>> device tree than one obtained via OF_PRIOR_STAGE. However, OF_SEPARATE may
> >>>>>> also indicate that the device tree which would be obtained via
> >>>>>> OF_PRIOR_STAGE is invalid, nonexistant, or otherwise unusable. In this
> >>>>>
> >>>>> typo: nonexistent
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> latter case, enabling OF_BOARD_FIXUP will result in corruption of the
> >>>>>> device tree. To remedy this, only enable OF_BOARD_FIXUP if U-Boot is
> >>>>>> configured for S-Mode.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Fixes: 1c17e55594a394ced7de88d91be294eaf8c564c1
> >>>>>
> >>>>> nits: the format should be: commit_id ("description")>
> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Sean Anderson <seanga2@gmail.com>
> >>>>>> ---
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> arch/riscv/Kconfig | 2 +-
> >>>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> >>>>>> index 009a545fcf..13fac51483 100644
> >>>>>> --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> >>>>>> +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> >>>>>> @@ -288,6 +288,6 @@ config STACK_SIZE_SHIFT
> >>>>>> default 14
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> config OF_BOARD_FIXUP
> >>>>>> - default y if OF_SEPARATE
> >>>>>> + default y if OF_SEPARATE && RISCV_SMODE
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Is that your board is running U-Boot M-mode with OF_SEPARATE that does not work?
> >>>>
> >>>> Yes, because the reason we use OF_SEPARATE is because no device tree is
> >>>> passed to U-Boot. Trying to use the device tree passed to U-Boot even
> >>>
> >>> I don't get it. If no device tree is passed to U-Boot, why using
> >>> OF_SEPARATE in the first place?
> >>
> >> Because it has to come from somewhere. Where else would U-Boot get the
> >> device tree?
> >
> > Sounds like there was some misunderstanding on "passed to U-Boot" ..
> > But I got it now.
> >
> >>
> >>>> though OF_SEPARATE is enabled results in garbage being written to the
> >>>
> >>> What garbage data is written?
> >>
> >> It might not be garbage written. I didn't document the exact failure
> >> mode at the time I discovered this bug, so I went back to try and
> >> reproduce it for a more thorough analysis. However, I was unable to
> >> reproduce this bug, even on the branch where I originally triggered it.
> >> I documented my reasoning behind this patch at [1]. In my testing, I
> >> could only trigger a "periodic-32" bug.
> >>
> >> In any case, this behavior could still cause problems in the future.
> >> From my testing, on the k210, a1 usually holds some address on the ROM's
> >> stack. However, if it (for instance) instead held an address which
> >
> > So U-Boot on K210 boots with M-mode from the K210 ROM, and the ROM
> > code does not hold DTB address in a1 before jumping to U-Boot, right?
> >
> >> raised a load access fault, or was misaligned, then booting would fail.
> >> In the general case, I was very surpised that U-Boot was using the value
> >> of a1 on entry even with OF_SEPARATE specified. I would expect it only
> >> to use that value if configured with OF_PRIOR_STAGE.
> >
> > Because U-Boot S-mode needs to fix up the DT when OF_SEPERATE is used.
>
> Right. It's just unexpected because OF_SEPARATE appears to imply to both
> use a separate device tree and to not use the passed-in device tree.
> This is because it is mutually exclusive with OF_PRIOR_STAGE. However,
> with OF_BOARD_FIXUP, it's as if one has selected both OF_SEPARATE and
> OF_PRIOR_STAGE at once. I think defaulting OF_BOARD_FIXUP to y only
> S-Mode is more likely to result in unsurprising behavior on new boards.
>
> --Sean
Reviewed-by: Leo Liang <ycliang@andestech.com>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-16 9:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-05 13:22 [PATCH] riscv: Only enable OF_BOARD_FIXUP for S-Mode Sean Anderson
2020-09-06 11:18 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2020-09-06 12:56 ` Sean Anderson
2020-09-11 7:29 ` Bin Meng
2020-09-11 10:20 ` Sean Anderson
2020-09-11 14:43 ` Bin Meng
2020-09-11 18:25 ` Sean Anderson
2020-09-14 6:38 ` Bin Meng
2020-09-14 11:57 ` Sean Anderson
2020-09-16 9:41 ` Leo Liang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200916094132.GA25540@andestech.com \
--to=ycliang@andestech.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox