From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Shevchenko Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 18:53:04 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] x86: acpi: Fix calculation of DSDT length In-Reply-To: References: <20200909131110.GW1891694@smile.fi.intel.com> <20200909123322.1684889-1-wolfgang.wallner@br-automation.com> <20200909130817.GU1891694@smile.fi.intel.com> Message-ID: <20200916155304.GS3956970@smile.fi.intel.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 05:00:26PM +0200, Wolfgang Wallner wrote: > -----"Andy Shevchenko" schrieb: ----- > > Betreff: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: acpi: Fix calculation of DSDT length > > > > On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 04:08:17PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 02:33:20PM +0200, Wolfgang Wallner wrote: > > > > Currently, the calculation for the length of the DSDT table includes any > > > > bytes that are added for alignment, but those bytes are not initialized. > > > > > > > > This is because the DSDT length is calculated after a call to > > > > acpi_inc_align(). Split this up into the following sequence: > > > > > > > > * acpi_inc() > > > > * Calculate DSDT length > > > > * acpi_align() > > > > > > Perhaps Fixes: tag? > > > > Ah, it is against series not yet applied? > > No, the patch is against master. > But I could not point to a specific commit that is fixed, the code in question > is a result of multiple commits. > > Because of this I have also sent V2 without a Fixes tags. Hmm... Usually in kernel we put a chain of Fixes in such cases. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko