From: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] ds414: Add sample u-boot update command
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2021 14:28:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210304132838.GN22016@orbyte.nwl.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <66cd71c8-b6e0-855a-8913-66128f0259f7@denx.de>
On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 02:09:34PM +0100, Stefan Roese wrote:
> On 03.03.21 01:55, Phil Sutter wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>
>
> It's common practice to add some minimal text in the commit text,
> even for simple patches.
I should learn to put less meaningful subjects in those cases so I have
an easier time finding something to write about in the description. Then
again, your question indicates I just didn't think hard enough.
[...]
> > diff --git a/include/configs/ds414.h b/include/configs/ds414.h
> > index a2248cf75ad72..c8b45066cc75a 100644
> > --- a/include/configs/ds414.h
> > +++ b/include/configs/ds414.h
> > @@ -88,7 +88,12 @@
> > "initrd_high=0xffffffff\0" \
> > "ramdisk_addr_r=0x8000000\0" \
> > "usb0Mode=host\0usb1Mode=host\0usb2Mode=device\0" \
> > - "ethmtu=1500\0eth1mtu=1500\0"
> > + "ethmtu=1500\0eth1mtu=1500\0" \
> > + "update_uboot=sf probe; dhcp; " \
> > + "mw.b ${loadaddr} 0x0 0xd0000; " \
> > + "tftpboot ${loadaddr} u-boot-spl.kwb; " \
> > + "sf update ${loadaddr} 0x0 0xd0000\0"
> > +
>
> Wouldn't it be better to use ${filesize} instead of 0xd0000 here?
U-Boot's "partition" size is fixed and hard-coded in the DTB at least.
Putting the destination size as a limit at least avoids the unlikely
chance of overwriting data past that partition.
BTW: I spent a while trying to make the DTB-defined partitions available
in sf command, but eventually gave up. Seems I need to have this
SPI->MTD mapping and still define partitions in environment. Not worth
spending cycles on though, I was just curious because 'help sf' mentions
partitions as offset alternatives.
Cheers, Phil
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-04 13:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-03 0:55 [PATCH 0/5] Synology DS414 integration mini-review Phil Sutter
2021-03-03 0:55 ` [PATCH 1/5] ds414: Add a Kconfig defining some strings Phil Sutter
2021-03-04 13:00 ` Stefan Roese
2021-03-03 0:55 ` [PATCH 2/5] configs: ds414: Enable XHCI_PCI by default Phil Sutter
2021-03-04 13:00 ` Stefan Roese
2021-03-04 13:11 ` Phil Sutter
2021-03-05 20:03 ` [PATCH v2 " Phil Sutter
2021-03-06 8:15 ` Stefan Roese
2021-03-07 20:58 ` Phil Sutter
2021-03-08 6:34 ` Stefan Roese
2021-03-07 21:21 ` [PATCH v3 " Phil Sutter
2021-03-08 6:34 ` Stefan Roese
2021-03-03 0:55 ` [PATCH 3/5] board/Synology: Unify legacy kernel support Phil Sutter
2021-03-04 13:03 ` Stefan Roese
2021-03-04 13:11 ` Phil Sutter
2021-03-05 20:04 ` [PATCH v2 " Phil Sutter
2021-03-07 21:22 ` [PATCH v3 " Phil Sutter
2021-03-08 6:36 ` Stefan Roese
2021-03-03 0:55 ` [PATCH 4/5] ds414: Auto-populate env if appropriate Phil Sutter
2021-03-04 13:06 ` Stefan Roese
2021-03-04 13:20 ` Phil Sutter
2021-03-04 13:22 ` Stefan Roese
2021-03-05 20:05 ` [PATCH v2 " Phil Sutter
2021-03-03 0:55 ` [PATCH 5/5] ds414: Add sample u-boot update command Phil Sutter
2021-03-04 13:09 ` Stefan Roese
2021-03-04 13:28 ` Phil Sutter [this message]
2021-03-04 13:34 ` Stefan Roese
2021-03-04 13:56 ` Phil Sutter
2021-03-05 20:05 ` [PATCH v2 " Phil Sutter
2021-04-08 8:52 ` [PATCH 0/5] Synology DS414 integration mini-review Stefan Roese
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210304132838.GN22016@orbyte.nwl.cc \
--to=phil@nwl.cc \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox