From: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [PATCH] cmd: part: number: remove inconsistent 0x from returned value
Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2021 15:12:37 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210306201237.GA1310@bill-the-cat> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPnjgZ1kRuLJ-W9=-0tE_vriPLig9DnQKxx9mWsGQzrUisssvQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 07:35:24AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 5 Mar 2021 at 07:33, Stefan Herbrechtsmeier
> <stefan.herbrechtsmeier-oss@weidmueller.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Eugeniu,
> >
> > Am 05.03.2021 um 12:52 schrieb Eugeniu Rosca:
> > > Hello Stefan,
> > >
> > > On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 07:39:04AM +0000, Stefan Herbrechtsmeier wrote:
> > >> From: Stefan Herbrechtsmeier <stefan.herbrechtsmeier@weidmueller.com>
> > >>
> > >> The part number sub-command returns the hexadecimal value with a leading
> > >> 0x.
> > >
> > > That's to make sure that:
> > > - users have clear and unequivocal feedback that '10'
> > > returned by the command is really HEX 10, not DEC 10.
> > > - other U-Boot commands which need to take '0x10' as input
> > > will interpret it correctly, regardless of the way these
> > > other commands implement ascii-to-integer conversion.
> >
> > 'Almost all U-Boot commands expect numbers to be entered in hexadecimal
> > input format.' [1]
> >
> > The filesystem commands use `simple_strtoul(.., 16)` and interpret the
> > value as hexadecimal value.
> >
> > The 0x suggests that a 10 will be interpreted as decimal value and this
> > isn't true.
> >
> > >> This is inconsistent with other values in the command
> > >
> > > It could be, but it is then better to fix the inconsistency in those
> > > commands/sub-commands which add the ambiguity.
> >
> > Normally you are right but U-Boot by design use hexadecimal values
> > without 0x. The env_set_hex functions doesn't use 0x.
> >
> > >> and U-Boot uses hexadecimal values generally.
> > >
> > > The key word is "generally", but not always. Some U-Boot commands will
> > > process '10' as HEX 10 and some will process 10 as DEC 10. So, in order
> > > to avoid these games, I vote for leaving the 0x in place.
>
> I would be very surprised if 10 means 0d10 in a partition number. I
> agree that putting a 0x in these values is a dangerous precedent and
> will just cause confusion. U-Boot uses hex for addresses and most
> arguments
>
> >
> > You can avoid it only if you could mark decimal numbers and that is
> > impossible.
>
> 0d10 is available. People are not used to it though.
>
> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
>
> >
> > @Tom: Does U-Boot still expect numbers to be hexadecimal values?
> >
> > [1] https://www.denx.de/wiki/DULG/UBootCommandLineInterface
> >
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Stefan Herbrechtsmeier <stefan.herbrechtsmeier@weidmueller.com>
> > >>
> > >> ---
> > >>
> > >> cmd/part.c | 2 +-
> > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >>
> > >> diff --git a/cmd/part.c b/cmd/part.c
> > >> index 3395c17b89..56e1852c66 100644
> > >> --- a/cmd/part.c
> > >> +++ b/cmd/part.c
> > >> @@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ static int do_part_info(int argc, char *const argv[], enum cmd_part_info param)
> > >> snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), LBAF, info.size);
> > >> break;
> > >> case CMD_PART_INFO_NUMBER:
> > >> - snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "0x%x", part);
> > >> + snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "%x", part);
> > >
I am not a fan of this change as well, especially having spent time on
some platforms that have literally 20+ partition entries. Being clear
here that this is a hex value is important.
--
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 659 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20210306/a796e20d/attachment.sig>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-06 20:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-05 7:39 [PATCH] cmd: part: number: remove inconsistent 0x from returned value Stefan Herbrechtsmeier
2021-03-05 11:52 ` Eugeniu Rosca
2021-03-05 14:33 ` Stefan Herbrechtsmeier
2021-03-05 14:35 ` Simon Glass
2021-03-06 20:12 ` Tom Rini [this message]
2021-03-08 10:45 ` Stefan Herbrechtsmeier
2021-03-12 4:45 ` Simon Glass
2021-03-12 6:57 ` Stefan Herbrechtsmeier
2021-03-12 15:47 ` Simon Glass
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210306201237.GA1310@bill-the-cat \
--to=trini@konsulko.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox