[PATCH v2 13/19] video: sunxi: de2: read address from DT node

[Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>]

On Sat,  6 Mar 2021 20:54:31 +0100
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@siol.net> wrote:

> Currently DE2 uses hardcoded address based on SoC for which U-Boot is
> built. Read it from DT instead so there is no need to specify it when
> support for new SoC is added.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@siol.net>

Looks alright. Since this was the only user of SUNXI_DE2_MUX[01]_BASE,
I wonder if we should remove those symbols from display2.h, to avoid
future code using them?

Reviewed-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>

Cheers,
Andre


> ---
>  drivers/video/sunxi/sunxi_de2.c | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/video/sunxi/sunxi_de2.c b/drivers/video/sunxi/sunxi_de2.c
> index 81576e45e9ef..f6c8ca075aba 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/sunxi/sunxi_de2.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/sunxi/sunxi_de2.c
> @@ -64,11 +64,10 @@ static void sunxi_de2_composer_init(void)
>  	setbits_le32(&ccm->de_clk_cfg, CCM_DE2_CTRL_GATE);
>  }
>  
> -static void sunxi_de2_mode_set(int mux, const struct display_timing *mode,
> +static void sunxi_de2_mode_set(ulong de_mux_base, int mux,
> +			       const struct display_timing *mode,
>  			       int bpp, ulong address, bool is_composite)
>  {
> -	ulong de_mux_base = (mux == 0) ?
> -			    SUNXI_DE2_MUX0_BASE : SUNXI_DE2_MUX1_BASE;
>  	struct de_clk * const de_clk_regs =
>  		(struct de_clk *)(SUNXI_DE2_BASE);
>  	struct de_glb * const de_glb_regs =
> @@ -208,7 +207,8 @@ static int sunxi_de2_init(struct udevice *dev, ulong fbbase,
>  	}
>  
>  	sunxi_de2_composer_init();
> -	sunxi_de2_mode_set(mux, &timing, 1 << l2bpp, fbbase, is_composite);
> +	sunxi_de2_mode_set((ulong)dev_read_addr(dev), mux, &timing,
> +			   1 << l2bpp, fbbase, is_composite);
>  
>  	ret = display_enable(disp, 1 << l2bpp, &timing);
>  	if (ret) {