* [PATCH v3 0/2] PE/COFF measurement support
@ 2021-04-28 12:19 Masahisa Kojima
2021-04-28 12:19 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] efi_loader: expose efi_image_parse() even if UEFI Secure Boot is disabled Masahisa Kojima
2021-04-28 12:19 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] efi_loader: add PE/COFF image measurement Masahisa Kojima
0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Masahisa Kojima @ 2021-04-28 12:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
This patch series add the PE/COFF measurement support.
Extending PCR and Event Log is tested with fTPM
running as a OP-TEE TA.
Unit test will be added in the separate series.
Masahisa Kojima (2):
efi_loader: expose efi_image_parse() even if UEFI Secure Boot is
disabled
efi_loader: add PE/COFF image measurement
include/efi_loader.h | 6 +
include/efi_tcg2.h | 9 ++
include/tpm-v2.h | 18 +++
lib/efi_loader/Kconfig | 6 +
lib/efi_loader/Makefile | 2 +-
lib/efi_loader/efi_image_loader.c | 132 +++++++++++++++----
lib/efi_loader/efi_signature.c | 67 +---------
lib/efi_loader/efi_tcg2.c | 207 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
lib/efi_loader/efi_var_common.c | 3 +
9 files changed, 351 insertions(+), 99 deletions(-)
--
2.17.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 1/2] efi_loader: expose efi_image_parse() even if UEFI Secure Boot is disabled
2021-04-28 12:19 [PATCH v3 0/2] PE/COFF measurement support Masahisa Kojima
@ 2021-04-28 12:19 ` Masahisa Kojima
2021-04-28 13:16 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2021-04-28 12:19 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] efi_loader: add PE/COFF image measurement Masahisa Kojima
1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Masahisa Kojima @ 2021-04-28 12:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
This is preparation for PE/COFF measurement support.
PE/COFF image hash calculation is same in both
UEFI Secure Boot image verification and measurement in
measured boot. PE/COFF image parsing functions are
gathered into efi_image_loader.c, and exposed even if
UEFI Secure Boot is not enabled.
This commit also adds the EFI_SIGNATURE_SUPPORT option
to decide if efi_signature.c shall be compiled.
Signed-off-by: Masahisa Kojima <masahisa.kojima@linaro.org>
---
Changes in v3:
- hide EFI_SIGNATURE_SUPPORT option
Changes in v2:
- Remove all #ifdef from efi_image_loader.c and efi_signature.c
- Add EFI_SIGNATURE_SUPPORT option
- Explicitly include <u-boot/hash-checksum.h>
- Gather PE/COFF parsing functions into efi_image_loader.c
- Move efi_guid_t efi_guid_image_security_database in efi_var_common.c
lib/efi_loader/Kconfig | 6 +++
lib/efi_loader/Makefile | 2 +-
lib/efi_loader/efi_image_loader.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
lib/efi_loader/efi_signature.c | 67 +---------------------------
lib/efi_loader/efi_var_common.c | 3 ++
5 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/Kconfig b/lib/efi_loader/Kconfig
index 0b99d7c774..b76e77180e 100644
--- a/lib/efi_loader/Kconfig
+++ b/lib/efi_loader/Kconfig
@@ -174,6 +174,7 @@ config EFI_CAPSULE_AUTHENTICATE
select PKCS7_MESSAGE_PARSER
select PKCS7_VERIFY
select IMAGE_SIGN_INFO
+ select EFI_SIGNATURE_SUPPORT
default n
help
Select this option if you want to enable capsule
@@ -336,6 +337,7 @@ config EFI_SECURE_BOOT
select X509_CERTIFICATE_PARSER
select PKCS7_MESSAGE_PARSER
select PKCS7_VERIFY
+ select EFI_SIGNATURE_SUPPORT
default n
help
Select this option to enable EFI secure boot support.
@@ -343,6 +345,10 @@ config EFI_SECURE_BOOT
it is signed with a trusted key. To do that, you need to install,
at least, PK, KEK and db.
+config EFI_SIGNATURE_SUPPORT
+ bool
+ depends on EFI_SECURE_BOOT || EFI_CAPSULE_AUTHENTICATE
+
config EFI_ESRT
bool "Enable the UEFI ESRT generation"
depends on EFI_CAPSULE_FIRMWARE_MANAGEMENT
diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/Makefile b/lib/efi_loader/Makefile
index 8bd343e258..fd344cea29 100644
--- a/lib/efi_loader/Makefile
+++ b/lib/efi_loader/Makefile
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_GENERATE_SMBIOS_TABLE) += efi_smbios.o
obj-$(CONFIG_EFI_RNG_PROTOCOL) += efi_rng.o
obj-$(CONFIG_EFI_TCG2_PROTOCOL) += efi_tcg2.o
obj-$(CONFIG_EFI_LOAD_FILE2_INITRD) += efi_load_initrd.o
-obj-y += efi_signature.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_EFI_SIGNATURE_SUPPORT) += efi_signature.o
EFI_VAR_SEED_FILE := $(subst $\",,$(CONFIG_EFI_VAR_SEED_FILE))
$(obj)/efi_var_seed.o: $(srctree)/$(EFI_VAR_SEED_FILE)
diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/efi_image_loader.c b/lib/efi_loader/efi_image_loader.c
index f53ef367ec..b8a790bcb9 100644
--- a/lib/efi_loader/efi_image_loader.c
+++ b/lib/efi_loader/efi_image_loader.c
@@ -213,7 +213,68 @@ static void efi_set_code_and_data_type(
}
}
-#ifdef CONFIG_EFI_SECURE_BOOT
+/**
+ * efi_image_region_add() - add an entry of region
+ * @regs: Pointer to array of regions
+ * @start: Start address of region (included)
+ * @end: End address of region (excluded)
+ * @nocheck: flag against overlapped regions
+ *
+ * Take one entry of region [@start, @end[ and insert it into the list.
+ *
+ * * If @nocheck is false, the list will be sorted ascending by address.
+ * Overlapping entries will not be allowed.
+ *
+ * * If @nocheck is true, the list will be sorted ascending by sequence
+ * of adding the entries. Overlapping is allowed.
+ *
+ * Return: status code
+ */
+efi_status_t efi_image_region_add(struct efi_image_regions *regs,
+ const void *start, const void *end,
+ int nocheck)
+{
+ struct image_region *reg;
+ int i, j;
+
+ if (regs->num >= regs->max) {
+ EFI_PRINT("%s: no more room for regions\n", __func__);
+ return EFI_OUT_OF_RESOURCES;
+ }
+
+ if (end < start)
+ return EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < regs->num; i++) {
+ reg = ®s->reg[i];
+ if (nocheck)
+ continue;
+
+ /* new data after registered region */
+ if (start >= reg->data + reg->size)
+ continue;
+
+ /* new data preceding registered region */
+ if (end <= reg->data) {
+ for (j = regs->num - 1; j >= i; j--)
+ memcpy(®s->reg[j + 1], ®s->reg[j],
+ sizeof(*reg));
+ break;
+ }
+
+ /* new data overlapping registered region */
+ EFI_PRINT("%s: new region already part of another\n", __func__);
+ return EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER;
+ }
+
+ reg = ®s->reg[i];
+ reg->data = start;
+ reg->size = end - start;
+ regs->num++;
+
+ return EFI_SUCCESS;
+}
+
/**
* cmp_pe_section() - compare virtual addresses of two PE image sections
* @arg1: pointer to pointer to first section header
@@ -504,6 +565,9 @@ static bool efi_image_authenticate(void *efi, size_t efi_size)
EFI_PRINT("%s: Enter, %d\n", __func__, ret);
+ if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EFI_SECURE_BOOT))
+ return true;
+
if (!efi_secure_boot_enabled())
return true;
@@ -668,13 +732,6 @@ err:
EFI_PRINT("%s: Exit, %d\n", __func__, ret);
return ret;
}
-#else
-static bool efi_image_authenticate(void *efi, size_t efi_size)
-{
- return true;
-}
-#endif /* CONFIG_EFI_SECURE_BOOT */
-
/**
* efi_check_pe() - check if a memory buffer contains a PE-COFF image
diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/efi_signature.c b/lib/efi_loader/efi_signature.c
index c7ec275414..bdd09881fc 100644
--- a/lib/efi_loader/efi_signature.c
+++ b/lib/efi_loader/efi_signature.c
@@ -15,18 +15,16 @@
#include <crypto/public_key.h>
#include <linux/compat.h>
#include <linux/oid_registry.h>
+#include <u-boot/hash-checksum.h>
#include <u-boot/rsa.h>
#include <u-boot/sha256.h>
-const efi_guid_t efi_guid_image_security_database =
- EFI_IMAGE_SECURITY_DATABASE_GUID;
const efi_guid_t efi_guid_sha256 = EFI_CERT_SHA256_GUID;
const efi_guid_t efi_guid_cert_rsa2048 = EFI_CERT_RSA2048_GUID;
const efi_guid_t efi_guid_cert_x509 = EFI_CERT_X509_GUID;
const efi_guid_t efi_guid_cert_x509_sha256 = EFI_CERT_X509_SHA256_GUID;
const efi_guid_t efi_guid_cert_type_pkcs7 = EFI_CERT_TYPE_PKCS7_GUID;
-#if defined(CONFIG_EFI_SECURE_BOOT) || defined(CONFIG_EFI_CAPSULE_AUTHENTICATE)
static u8 pkcs7_hdr[] = {
/* SEQUENCE */
0x30, 0x82, 0x05, 0xc7,
@@ -539,68 +537,6 @@ out:
return !revoked;
}
-/**
- * efi_image_region_add() - add an entry of region
- * @regs: Pointer to array of regions
- * @start: Start address of region (included)
- * @end: End address of region (excluded)
- * @nocheck: flag against overlapped regions
- *
- * Take one entry of region [@start, @end[ and insert it into the list.
- *
- * * If @nocheck is false, the list will be sorted ascending by address.
- * Overlapping entries will not be allowed.
- *
- * * If @nocheck is true, the list will be sorted ascending by sequence
- * of adding the entries. Overlapping is allowed.
- *
- * Return: status code
- */
-efi_status_t efi_image_region_add(struct efi_image_regions *regs,
- const void *start, const void *end,
- int nocheck)
-{
- struct image_region *reg;
- int i, j;
-
- if (regs->num >= regs->max) {
- EFI_PRINT("%s: no more room for regions\n", __func__);
- return EFI_OUT_OF_RESOURCES;
- }
-
- if (end < start)
- return EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER;
-
- for (i = 0; i < regs->num; i++) {
- reg = ®s->reg[i];
- if (nocheck)
- continue;
-
- /* new data after registered region */
- if (start >= reg->data + reg->size)
- continue;
-
- /* new data preceding registered region */
- if (end <= reg->data) {
- for (j = regs->num - 1; j >= i; j--)
- memcpy(®s->reg[j + 1], ®s->reg[j],
- sizeof(*reg));
- break;
- }
-
- /* new data overlapping registered region */
- EFI_PRINT("%s: new region already part of another\n", __func__);
- return EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER;
- }
-
- reg = ®s->reg[i];
- reg->data = start;
- reg->size = end - start;
- regs->num++;
-
- return EFI_SUCCESS;
-}
-
/**
* efi_sigstore_free - free signature store
* @sigstore: Pointer to signature store structure
@@ -846,4 +782,3 @@ struct efi_signature_store *efi_sigstore_parse_sigdb(u16 *name)
return efi_build_signature_store(db, db_size);
}
-#endif /* CONFIG_EFI_SECURE_BOOT || CONFIG_EFI_CAPSULE_AUTHENTICATE */
diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/efi_var_common.c b/lib/efi_loader/efi_var_common.c
index b11ed91a74..83479dd142 100644
--- a/lib/efi_loader/efi_var_common.c
+++ b/lib/efi_loader/efi_var_common.c
@@ -24,6 +24,9 @@ struct efi_auth_var_name_type {
const enum efi_auth_var_type type;
};
+const efi_guid_t efi_guid_image_security_database =
+ EFI_IMAGE_SECURITY_DATABASE_GUID;
+
static const struct efi_auth_var_name_type name_type[] = {
{u"PK", &efi_global_variable_guid, EFI_AUTH_VAR_PK},
{u"KEK", &efi_global_variable_guid, EFI_AUTH_VAR_KEK},
--
2.17.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 2/2] efi_loader: add PE/COFF image measurement
2021-04-28 12:19 [PATCH v3 0/2] PE/COFF measurement support Masahisa Kojima
2021-04-28 12:19 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] efi_loader: expose efi_image_parse() even if UEFI Secure Boot is disabled Masahisa Kojima
@ 2021-04-28 12:19 ` Masahisa Kojima
1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Masahisa Kojima @ 2021-04-28 12:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
"TCG PC Client Platform Firmware Profile Specification"
requires to measure every attempt to load and execute
a OS Loader(a UEFI application) into PCR[4].
This commit adds the PE/COFF image measurement, extends PCR,
and appends measurement into Event Log.
Signed-off-by: Masahisa Kojima <masahisa.kojima@linaro.org>
---
(no changes since v2)
Changes in v2:
- Remove duplicate <efi.h> include
- Remove unnecessary __packed attribute
- Add all EV_EFI_* event definition
- Create common function to prepare 8-byte aligned image
- Add measurement for EV_EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_DRIVER and
EV_EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_DRIVER
- Use efi_search_protocol() to get device_path
- Add function comment
include/efi_loader.h | 6 +
include/efi_tcg2.h | 9 ++
include/tpm-v2.h | 18 +++
lib/efi_loader/efi_image_loader.c | 59 +++++++--
lib/efi_loader/efi_tcg2.c | 207 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
5 files changed, 275 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/efi_loader.h b/include/efi_loader.h
index de1a496a97..9f2854a255 100644
--- a/include/efi_loader.h
+++ b/include/efi_loader.h
@@ -426,6 +426,10 @@ efi_status_t efi_disk_register(void);
efi_status_t efi_rng_register(void);
/* Called by efi_init_obj_list() to install EFI_TCG2_PROTOCOL */
efi_status_t efi_tcg2_register(void);
+/* measure the pe-coff image, extend PCR and add Event Log */
+efi_status_t tcg2_measure_pe_image(void *efi, u64 efi_size,
+ struct efi_loaded_image_obj *handle,
+ struct efi_loaded_image *loaded_image_info);
/* Create handles and protocols for the partitions of a block device */
int efi_disk_create_partitions(efi_handle_t parent, struct blk_desc *desc,
const char *if_typename, int diskid,
@@ -847,6 +851,8 @@ bool efi_secure_boot_enabled(void);
bool efi_capsule_auth_enabled(void);
+void *efi_prepare_aligned_image(void *efi, u64 *efi_size, void **new_efi);
+
bool efi_image_parse(void *efi, size_t len, struct efi_image_regions **regp,
WIN_CERTIFICATE **auth, size_t *auth_len);
diff --git a/include/efi_tcg2.h b/include/efi_tcg2.h
index 40e241ce31..bcfb98168a 100644
--- a/include/efi_tcg2.h
+++ b/include/efi_tcg2.h
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
#if !defined _EFI_TCG2_PROTOCOL_H_
#define _EFI_TCG2_PROTOCOL_H_
+#include <efi_api.h>
#include <tpm-v2.h>
#define EFI_TCG2_PROTOCOL_GUID \
@@ -53,6 +54,14 @@ struct efi_tcg2_event {
u8 event[];
} __packed;
+struct uefi_image_load_event {
+ efi_physical_addr_t image_location_in_memory;
+ u64 image_length_in_memory;
+ u64 image_link_time_address;
+ u64 length_of_device_path;
+ struct efi_device_path device_path[];
+};
+
struct efi_tcg2_boot_service_capability {
u8 size;
struct efi_tcg2_version structure_version;
diff --git a/include/tpm-v2.h b/include/tpm-v2.h
index df67a196cf..6e812c017c 100644
--- a/include/tpm-v2.h
+++ b/include/tpm-v2.h
@@ -62,6 +62,24 @@ struct udevice;
#define EV_CPU_MICROCODE ((u32)0x00000009)
#define EV_TABLE_OF_DEVICES ((u32)0x0000000B)
+/*
+ * event types, cf.
+ * "TCG PC Client Platform Firmware Profile Specification", Family "2.0"
+ * rev 1.04, June 3, 2019
+ */
+#define EV_EFI_EVENT_BASE ((u32)0x80000000)
+#define EV_EFI_VARIABLE_DRIVER_CONFIG ((u32)0x80000001)
+#define EV_EFI_VARIABLE_BOOT ((u32)0x80000002)
+#define EV_EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_APPLICATION ((u32)0x80000003)
+#define EV_EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_DRIVER ((u32)0x80000004)
+#define EV_EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_DRIVER ((u32)0x80000005)
+#define EV_EFI_GPT_EVENT ((u32)0x80000006)
+#define EV_EFI_ACTION ((u32)0x80000007)
+#define EV_EFI_PLATFORM_FIRMWARE_BLOB ((u32)0x80000008)
+#define EV_EFI_HANDOFF_TABLES ((u32)0x80000009)
+#define EV_EFI_HCRTM_EVENT ((u32)0x80000010)
+#define EV_EFI_VARIABLE_AUTHORITY ((u32)0x800000E0)
+
/* TPMS_TAGGED_PROPERTY Structure */
struct tpms_tagged_property {
u32 property;
diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/efi_image_loader.c b/lib/efi_loader/efi_image_loader.c
index b8a790bcb9..cc548e1b88 100644
--- a/lib/efi_loader/efi_image_loader.c
+++ b/lib/efi_loader/efi_image_loader.c
@@ -302,6 +302,40 @@ static int cmp_pe_section(const void *arg1, const void *arg2)
return 1;
}
+/**
+ * efi_prepare_aligned_image() - prepare 8-byte aligned image
+ * @efi: pointer to the EFI binary
+ * @efi_size: size of @efi binary
+ * @new_efi: pointer to the newly allocated image
+ *
+ * If @efi is not 8-byte aligned, this function newly allocates
+ * the image buffer and updates @efi_size.
+ *
+ * Return: valid pointer to a image, return NULL if allocation fails.
+ */
+void *efi_prepare_aligned_image(void *efi, u64 *efi_size, void **new_efi)
+{
+ size_t new_efi_size;
+ void *p;
+
+ /*
+ * Size must be 8-byte aligned and the trailing bytes must be
+ * zero'ed. Otherwise hash value may be incorrect.
+ */
+ if (!IS_ALIGNED(*efi_size, 8)) {
+ new_efi_size = ALIGN(*efi_size, 8);
+ p = calloc(new_efi_size, 1);
+ if (!p)
+ return NULL;
+ memcpy(p, efi, *efi_size);
+ *efi_size = new_efi_size;
+ *new_efi = p;
+ return p;
+ } else {
+ return efi;
+ }
+}
+
/**
* efi_image_parse() - parse a PE image
* @efi: Pointer to image
@@ -560,7 +594,7 @@ static bool efi_image_authenticate(void *efi, size_t efi_size)
struct efi_signature_store *db = NULL, *dbx = NULL;
void *new_efi = NULL;
u8 *auth, *wincerts_end;
- size_t new_efi_size, auth_size;
+ size_t auth_size;
bool ret = false;
EFI_PRINT("%s: Enter, %d\n", __func__, ret);
@@ -571,19 +605,9 @@ static bool efi_image_authenticate(void *efi, size_t efi_size)
if (!efi_secure_boot_enabled())
return true;
- /*
- * Size must be 8-byte aligned and the trailing bytes must be
- * zero'ed. Otherwise hash value may be incorrect.
- */
- if (efi_size & 0x7) {
- new_efi_size = (efi_size + 0x7) & ~0x7ULL;
- new_efi = calloc(new_efi_size, 1);
- if (!new_efi)
- return false;
- memcpy(new_efi, efi, efi_size);
- efi = new_efi;
- efi_size = new_efi_size;
- }
+ efi = efi_prepare_aligned_image(efi, (u64 *)&efi_size, &new_efi);
+ if (!efi)
+ return false;
if (!efi_image_parse(efi, efi_size, ®s, &wincerts,
&wincerts_len)) {
@@ -886,6 +910,13 @@ efi_status_t efi_load_pe(struct efi_loaded_image_obj *handle,
goto err;
}
+#if CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(EFI_TCG2_PROTOCOL)
+ /* Measure an PE/COFF image */
+ if (tcg2_measure_pe_image(efi, efi_size, handle,
+ loaded_image_info))
+ log_err("PE image measurement failed\n");
+#endif
+
/* Copy PE headers */
memcpy(efi_reloc, efi,
sizeof(*dos)
diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/efi_tcg2.c b/lib/efi_loader/efi_tcg2.c
index 94e8f22bbb..7ad9cb2b89 100644
--- a/lib/efi_loader/efi_tcg2.c
+++ b/lib/efi_loader/efi_tcg2.c
@@ -13,8 +13,10 @@
#include <efi_loader.h>
#include <efi_tcg2.h>
#include <log.h>
+#include <malloc.h>
#include <version.h>
#include <tpm-v2.h>
+#include <u-boot/rsa.h>
#include <u-boot/sha1.h>
#include <u-boot/sha256.h>
#include <u-boot/sha512.h>
@@ -706,6 +708,183 @@ out:
return EFI_EXIT(ret);
}
+/**
+ * tcg2_hash_pe_image() - calculate PE/COFF image hash
+ *
+ * @efi: pointer to the EFI binary
+ * @efi_size: size of @efi binary
+ * @digest_list: list of digest algorithms to extend
+ *
+ * Return: status code
+ */
+static efi_status_t tcg2_hash_pe_image(void *efi, u64 efi_size,
+ struct tpml_digest_values *digest_list)
+{
+ WIN_CERTIFICATE *wincerts = NULL;
+ size_t wincerts_len;
+ struct efi_image_regions *regs = NULL;
+ void *new_efi = NULL;
+ u8 hash[TPM2_SHA512_DIGEST_SIZE];
+ efi_status_t ret;
+ u32 active;
+ int i;
+
+ efi = efi_prepare_aligned_image(efi, &efi_size, &new_efi);
+ if (!efi)
+ return EFI_OUT_OF_RESOURCES;
+
+ if (!efi_image_parse(efi, efi_size, ®s, &wincerts,
+ &wincerts_len)) {
+ log_err("Parsing PE executable image failed\n");
+ ret = EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ ret = __get_active_pcr_banks(&active);
+ if (ret != EFI_SUCCESS) {
+ ret = EFI_DEVICE_ERROR;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ digest_list->count = 0;
+ for (i = 0; i < MAX_HASH_COUNT; i++) {
+ u16 hash_alg = hash_algo_list[i].hash_alg;
+
+ if (!(active & alg_to_mask(hash_alg)))
+ continue;
+ switch (hash_alg) {
+ case TPM2_ALG_SHA1:
+ hash_calculate("sha1", regs->reg, regs->num, hash);
+ break;
+ case TPM2_ALG_SHA256:
+ hash_calculate("sha256", regs->reg, regs->num, hash);
+ break;
+ case TPM2_ALG_SHA384:
+ hash_calculate("sha384", regs->reg, regs->num, hash);
+ break;
+ case TPM2_ALG_SHA512:
+ hash_calculate("sha512", regs->reg, regs->num, hash);
+ break;
+ default:
+ EFI_PRINT("Unsupported algorithm %x\n", hash_alg);
+ return EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER;
+ }
+ digest_list->digests[i].hash_alg = hash_alg;
+ memcpy(&digest_list->digests[i].digest, hash, (u32)alg_to_len(hash_alg));
+ digest_list->count++;
+ }
+
+out:
+ free(new_efi);
+ free(regs);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+/**
+ * tcg2_measure_pe_image() - measure PE/COFF image
+ *
+ * @efi: pointer to the EFI binary
+ * @efi_size: size of @efi binary
+ * @handle: loaded image handle
+ * @loaded_image: loaded image protocol
+ *
+ * Return: status code
+ */
+efi_status_t tcg2_measure_pe_image(void *efi, u64 efi_size,
+ struct efi_loaded_image_obj *handle,
+ struct efi_loaded_image *loaded_image)
+{
+ struct tpml_digest_values digest_list;
+ efi_status_t ret;
+ struct udevice *dev;
+ u32 pcr_index, event_type, event_size;
+ struct uefi_image_load_event *image_load_event;
+ struct efi_device_path *device_path;
+ u32 device_path_length;
+ IMAGE_DOS_HEADER *dos;
+ IMAGE_NT_HEADERS32 *nt;
+ struct efi_handler *handler;
+
+ ret = platform_get_tpm2_device(&dev);
+ if (ret != EFI_SUCCESS)
+ return ret;
+
+ switch (handle->image_type) {
+ case IMAGE_SUBSYSTEM_EFI_APPLICATION:
+ pcr_index = 4;
+ event_type = EV_EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_APPLICATION;
+ break;
+ case IMAGE_SUBSYSTEM_EFI_BOOT_SERVICE_DRIVER:
+ pcr_index = 2;
+ event_type = EV_EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_DRIVER;
+ break;
+ case IMAGE_SUBSYSTEM_EFI_RUNTIME_DRIVER:
+ pcr_index = 2;
+ event_type = EV_EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_DRIVER;
+ break;
+ default:
+ return EFI_UNSUPPORTED;
+ }
+
+ ret = tcg2_hash_pe_image(efi, efi_size, &digest_list);
+ if (ret != EFI_SUCCESS)
+ return ret;
+
+ ret = tcg2_pcr_extend(dev, pcr_index, &digest_list);
+ if (ret != EFI_SUCCESS)
+ return ret;
+
+ ret = EFI_CALL(efi_search_protocol(&handle->header,
+ &efi_guid_loaded_image_device_path,
+ &handler));
+ if (ret != EFI_SUCCESS)
+ return ret;
+
+ device_path = EFI_CALL(handler->protocol_interface);
+ device_path_length = efi_dp_size(device_path);
+ if (device_path_length > 0) {
+ /* add end node size */
+ device_path_length += sizeof(struct efi_device_path);
+ }
+ event_size = sizeof(struct uefi_image_load_event) + device_path_length;
+ image_load_event = (struct uefi_image_load_event *)malloc(event_size);
+ if (!image_load_event)
+ return EFI_OUT_OF_RESOURCES;
+
+ image_load_event->image_location_in_memory = (efi_physical_addr_t)efi;
+ image_load_event->image_length_in_memory = efi_size;
+ image_load_event->length_of_device_path = device_path_length;
+
+ dos = (IMAGE_DOS_HEADER *)efi;
+ nt = (IMAGE_NT_HEADERS32 *)(efi + dos->e_lfanew);
+ if (nt->OptionalHeader.Magic == IMAGE_NT_OPTIONAL_HDR64_MAGIC) {
+ IMAGE_NT_HEADERS64 *nt64 = (IMAGE_NT_HEADERS64 *)nt;
+
+ image_load_event->image_link_time_address =
+ nt64->OptionalHeader.ImageBase;
+ } else if (nt->OptionalHeader.Magic == IMAGE_NT_OPTIONAL_HDR32_MAGIC) {
+ image_load_event->image_link_time_address =
+ nt->OptionalHeader.ImageBase;
+ } else {
+ ret = EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ if (device_path_length > 0) {
+ memcpy(image_load_event->device_path, device_path,
+ device_path_length);
+ }
+
+ ret = tcg2_agile_log_append(pcr_index, event_type, &digest_list,
+ event_size, (u8 *)image_load_event);
+
+out:
+ free(image_load_event);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
/**
* efi_tcg2_hash_log_extend_event() - extend and optionally log events
*
@@ -758,24 +937,32 @@ efi_tcg2_hash_log_extend_event(struct efi_tcg2_protocol *this, u64 flags,
/*
* if PE_COFF_IMAGE is set we need to make sure the image is not
* corrupted, verify it and hash the PE/COFF image in accordance with
- * the procedure specified in "Calculating the PE Image Hash"
- * section of the "Windows Authenticode Portable Executable Signature
+ * the procedure specified in "Calculating the PE Image Hash"
+ * section of the "Windows Authenticode Portable Executable Signature
* Format"
- * Not supported for now
*/
if (flags & PE_COFF_IMAGE) {
- ret = EFI_UNSUPPORTED;
- goto out;
- }
+ IMAGE_NT_HEADERS32 *nt;
- pcr_index = efi_tcg_event->header.pcr_index;
- event_type = efi_tcg_event->header.event_type;
+ ret = efi_check_pe((void *)data_to_hash, data_to_hash_len,
+ (void **)&nt);
+ if (ret != EFI_SUCCESS) {
+ log_err("Not a valid PE-COFF file\n");
+ goto out;
+ }
- ret = tcg2_create_digest((u8 *)data_to_hash, data_to_hash_len,
- &digest_list);
+ ret = tcg2_hash_pe_image((void *)data_to_hash, data_to_hash_len,
+ &digest_list);
+ } else {
+ ret = tcg2_create_digest((u8 *)data_to_hash, data_to_hash_len,
+ &digest_list);
+ }
if (ret != EFI_SUCCESS)
goto out;
+ pcr_index = efi_tcg_event->header.pcr_index;
+ event_type = efi_tcg_event->header.event_type;
+
ret = tcg2_pcr_extend(dev, pcr_index, &digest_list);
if (ret != EFI_SUCCESS)
goto out;
--
2.17.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 1/2] efi_loader: expose efi_image_parse() even if UEFI Secure Boot is disabled
2021-04-28 12:19 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] efi_loader: expose efi_image_parse() even if UEFI Secure Boot is disabled Masahisa Kojima
@ 2021-04-28 13:16 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2021-05-08 14:08 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Heinrich Schuchardt @ 2021-04-28 13:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On 28.04.21 14:19, Masahisa Kojima wrote:
> This is preparation for PE/COFF measurement support.
> PE/COFF image hash calculation is same in both
> UEFI Secure Boot image verification and measurement in
> measured boot. PE/COFF image parsing functions are
> gathered into efi_image_loader.c, and exposed even if
> UEFI Secure Boot is not enabled.
>
> This commit also adds the EFI_SIGNATURE_SUPPORT option
> to decide if efi_signature.c shall be compiled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masahisa Kojima <masahisa.kojima@linaro.org>
> ---
>
> Changes in v3:
> - hide EFI_SIGNATURE_SUPPORT option
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Remove all #ifdef from efi_image_loader.c and efi_signature.c
> - Add EFI_SIGNATURE_SUPPORT option
> - Explicitly include <u-boot/hash-checksum.h>
> - Gather PE/COFF parsing functions into efi_image_loader.c
> - Move efi_guid_t efi_guid_image_security_database in efi_var_common.c
>
>
> lib/efi_loader/Kconfig | 6 +++
> lib/efi_loader/Makefile | 2 +-
> lib/efi_loader/efi_image_loader.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> lib/efi_loader/efi_signature.c | 67 +---------------------------
> lib/efi_loader/efi_var_common.c | 3 ++
> 5 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/Kconfig b/lib/efi_loader/Kconfig
> index 0b99d7c774..b76e77180e 100644
> --- a/lib/efi_loader/Kconfig
> +++ b/lib/efi_loader/Kconfig
> @@ -174,6 +174,7 @@ config EFI_CAPSULE_AUTHENTICATE
> select PKCS7_MESSAGE_PARSER
> select PKCS7_VERIFY
> select IMAGE_SIGN_INFO
> + select EFI_SIGNATURE_SUPPORT
> default n
> help
> Select this option if you want to enable capsule
> @@ -336,6 +337,7 @@ config EFI_SECURE_BOOT
> select X509_CERTIFICATE_PARSER
> select PKCS7_MESSAGE_PARSER
> select PKCS7_VERIFY
> + select EFI_SIGNATURE_SUPPORT
> default n
> help
> Select this option to enable EFI secure boot support.
> @@ -343,6 +345,10 @@ config EFI_SECURE_BOOT
> it is signed with a trusted key. To do that, you need to install,
> at least, PK, KEK and db.
>
> +config EFI_SIGNATURE_SUPPORT
> + bool
> + depends on EFI_SECURE_BOOT || EFI_CAPSULE_AUTHENTICATE
> +
> config EFI_ESRT
> bool "Enable the UEFI ESRT generation"
> depends on EFI_CAPSULE_FIRMWARE_MANAGEMENT
> diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/Makefile b/lib/efi_loader/Makefile
> index 8bd343e258..fd344cea29 100644
> --- a/lib/efi_loader/Makefile
> +++ b/lib/efi_loader/Makefile
> @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_GENERATE_SMBIOS_TABLE) += efi_smbios.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_EFI_RNG_PROTOCOL) += efi_rng.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_EFI_TCG2_PROTOCOL) += efi_tcg2.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_EFI_LOAD_FILE2_INITRD) += efi_load_initrd.o
> -obj-y += efi_signature.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_EFI_SIGNATURE_SUPPORT) += efi_signature.o
>
> EFI_VAR_SEED_FILE := $(subst $\",,$(CONFIG_EFI_VAR_SEED_FILE))
> $(obj)/efi_var_seed.o: $(srctree)/$(EFI_VAR_SEED_FILE)
> diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/efi_image_loader.c b/lib/efi_loader/efi_image_loader.c
> index f53ef367ec..b8a790bcb9 100644
> --- a/lib/efi_loader/efi_image_loader.c
> +++ b/lib/efi_loader/efi_image_loader.c
> @@ -213,7 +213,68 @@ static void efi_set_code_and_data_type(
> }
> }
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_EFI_SECURE_BOOT
> +/**
> + * efi_image_region_add() - add an entry of region
> + * @regs: Pointer to array of regions
> + * @start: Start address of region (included)
> + * @end: End address of region (excluded)
> + * @nocheck: flag against overlapped regions
> + *
> + * Take one entry of region [@start, @end[ and insert it into the list.
> + *
> + * * If @nocheck is false, the list will be sorted ascending by address.
> + * Overlapping entries will not be allowed.
> + *
> + * * If @nocheck is true, the list will be sorted ascending by sequence
> + * of adding the entries. Overlapping is allowed.
> + *
> + * Return: status code
> + */
> +efi_status_t efi_image_region_add(struct efi_image_regions *regs,
> + const void *start, const void *end,
> + int nocheck)
> +{
> + struct image_region *reg;
> + int i, j;
> +
> + if (regs->num >= regs->max) {
> + EFI_PRINT("%s: no more room for regions\n", __func__);
> + return EFI_OUT_OF_RESOURCES;
> + }
> +
> + if (end < start)
> + return EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < regs->num; i++) {
> + reg = ®s->reg[i];
> + if (nocheck)
> + continue;
> +
> + /* new data after registered region */
> + if (start >= reg->data + reg->size)
> + continue;
> +
> + /* new data preceding registered region */
> + if (end <= reg->data) {
> + for (j = regs->num - 1; j >= i; j--)
> + memcpy(®s->reg[j + 1], ®s->reg[j],
> + sizeof(*reg));
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + /* new data overlapping registered region */
> + EFI_PRINT("%s: new region already part of another\n", __func__);
> + return EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER;
> + }
> +
> + reg = ®s->reg[i];
> + reg->data = start;
> + reg->size = end - start;
> + regs->num++;
> +
> + return EFI_SUCCESS;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * cmp_pe_section() - compare virtual addresses of two PE image sections
> * @arg1: pointer to pointer to first section header
> @@ -504,6 +565,9 @@ static bool efi_image_authenticate(void *efi, size_t efi_size)
>
> EFI_PRINT("%s: Enter, %d\n", __func__, ret);
>
> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EFI_SECURE_BOOT))
> + return true;
> +
Why is this needed? Doesn't efi_secure_boot_enabled() return false in
this case?
Best regards
Heinrich
> if (!efi_secure_boot_enabled())
> return true;
>
> @@ -668,13 +732,6 @@ err:
> EFI_PRINT("%s: Exit, %d\n", __func__, ret);
> return ret;
> }
> -#else
> -static bool efi_image_authenticate(void *efi, size_t efi_size)
> -{
> - return true;
> -}
> -#endif /* CONFIG_EFI_SECURE_BOOT */
> -
>
> /**
> * efi_check_pe() - check if a memory buffer contains a PE-COFF image
> diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/efi_signature.c b/lib/efi_loader/efi_signature.c
> index c7ec275414..bdd09881fc 100644
> --- a/lib/efi_loader/efi_signature.c
> +++ b/lib/efi_loader/efi_signature.c
> @@ -15,18 +15,16 @@
> #include <crypto/public_key.h>
> #include <linux/compat.h>
> #include <linux/oid_registry.h>
> +#include <u-boot/hash-checksum.h>
> #include <u-boot/rsa.h>
> #include <u-boot/sha256.h>
>
> -const efi_guid_t efi_guid_image_security_database =
> - EFI_IMAGE_SECURITY_DATABASE_GUID;
> const efi_guid_t efi_guid_sha256 = EFI_CERT_SHA256_GUID;
> const efi_guid_t efi_guid_cert_rsa2048 = EFI_CERT_RSA2048_GUID;
> const efi_guid_t efi_guid_cert_x509 = EFI_CERT_X509_GUID;
> const efi_guid_t efi_guid_cert_x509_sha256 = EFI_CERT_X509_SHA256_GUID;
> const efi_guid_t efi_guid_cert_type_pkcs7 = EFI_CERT_TYPE_PKCS7_GUID;
>
> -#if defined(CONFIG_EFI_SECURE_BOOT) || defined(CONFIG_EFI_CAPSULE_AUTHENTICATE)
> static u8 pkcs7_hdr[] = {
> /* SEQUENCE */
> 0x30, 0x82, 0x05, 0xc7,
> @@ -539,68 +537,6 @@ out:
> return !revoked;
> }
>
> -/**
> - * efi_image_region_add() - add an entry of region
> - * @regs: Pointer to array of regions
> - * @start: Start address of region (included)
> - * @end: End address of region (excluded)
> - * @nocheck: flag against overlapped regions
> - *
> - * Take one entry of region [@start, @end[ and insert it into the list.
> - *
> - * * If @nocheck is false, the list will be sorted ascending by address.
> - * Overlapping entries will not be allowed.
> - *
> - * * If @nocheck is true, the list will be sorted ascending by sequence
> - * of adding the entries. Overlapping is allowed.
> - *
> - * Return: status code
> - */
> -efi_status_t efi_image_region_add(struct efi_image_regions *regs,
> - const void *start, const void *end,
> - int nocheck)
> -{
> - struct image_region *reg;
> - int i, j;
> -
> - if (regs->num >= regs->max) {
> - EFI_PRINT("%s: no more room for regions\n", __func__);
> - return EFI_OUT_OF_RESOURCES;
> - }
> -
> - if (end < start)
> - return EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER;
> -
> - for (i = 0; i < regs->num; i++) {
> - reg = ®s->reg[i];
> - if (nocheck)
> - continue;
> -
> - /* new data after registered region */
> - if (start >= reg->data + reg->size)
> - continue;
> -
> - /* new data preceding registered region */
> - if (end <= reg->data) {
> - for (j = regs->num - 1; j >= i; j--)
> - memcpy(®s->reg[j + 1], ®s->reg[j],
> - sizeof(*reg));
> - break;
> - }
> -
> - /* new data overlapping registered region */
> - EFI_PRINT("%s: new region already part of another\n", __func__);
> - return EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER;
> - }
> -
> - reg = ®s->reg[i];
> - reg->data = start;
> - reg->size = end - start;
> - regs->num++;
> -
> - return EFI_SUCCESS;
> -}
> -
> /**
> * efi_sigstore_free - free signature store
> * @sigstore: Pointer to signature store structure
> @@ -846,4 +782,3 @@ struct efi_signature_store *efi_sigstore_parse_sigdb(u16 *name)
>
> return efi_build_signature_store(db, db_size);
> }
> -#endif /* CONFIG_EFI_SECURE_BOOT || CONFIG_EFI_CAPSULE_AUTHENTICATE */
> diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/efi_var_common.c b/lib/efi_loader/efi_var_common.c
> index b11ed91a74..83479dd142 100644
> --- a/lib/efi_loader/efi_var_common.c
> +++ b/lib/efi_loader/efi_var_common.c
> @@ -24,6 +24,9 @@ struct efi_auth_var_name_type {
> const enum efi_auth_var_type type;
> };
>
> +const efi_guid_t efi_guid_image_security_database =
> + EFI_IMAGE_SECURITY_DATABASE_GUID;
> +
> static const struct efi_auth_var_name_type name_type[] = {
> {u"PK", &efi_global_variable_guid, EFI_AUTH_VAR_PK},
> {u"KEK", &efi_global_variable_guid, EFI_AUTH_VAR_KEK},
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 1/2] efi_loader: expose efi_image_parse() even if UEFI Secure Boot is disabled
2021-04-28 13:16 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
@ 2021-05-08 14:08 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2021-05-10 0:49 ` Masahisa Kojima
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Heinrich Schuchardt @ 2021-05-08 14:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On 4/28/21 3:16 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 28.04.21 14:19, Masahisa Kojima wrote:
<snip />
>> /**
>> * cmp_pe_section() - compare virtual addresses of two PE image sections
>> * @arg1: pointer to pointer to first section header
>> @@ -504,6 +565,9 @@ static bool efi_image_authenticate(void *efi, size_t efi_size)
>>
>> EFI_PRINT("%s: Enter, %d\n", __func__, ret);
>>
>> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EFI_SECURE_BOOT))
>> + return true;
>> +
>
> Why is this needed? Doesn't efi_secure_boot_enabled() return false in
> this case?
Hello Masahisa,
I did not see any reply yet. Was a mail lost?
Best regards
Heinrich
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 1/2] efi_loader: expose efi_image_parse() even if UEFI Secure Boot is disabled
2021-05-08 14:08 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
@ 2021-05-10 0:49 ` Masahisa Kojima
2021-05-10 2:07 ` Takahiro Akashi
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Masahisa Kojima @ 2021-05-10 0:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Hi Heinrich,
Sorry for the late reply.
On Sat, 8 May 2021 at 23:08, Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> wrote:
>
> On 4/28/21 3:16 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> > On 28.04.21 14:19, Masahisa Kojima wrote:
> <snip />
> >> /**
> >> * cmp_pe_section() - compare virtual addresses of two PE image sections
> >> * @arg1: pointer to pointer to first section header
> >> @@ -504,6 +565,9 @@ static bool efi_image_authenticate(void *efi, size_t efi_size)
> >>
> >> EFI_PRINT("%s: Enter, %d\n", __func__, ret);
> >>
> >> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EFI_SECURE_BOOT))
> >> + return true;
> >> +
> >
> > Why is this needed? Doesn't efi_secure_boot_enabled() return false in
> > this case?
The original code is as follows.
#ifdef CONFIG_EFI_SECURE_BOOT
static bool efi_image_authenticate(void *efi, size_t efi_size) {
< snip >
}
#else
static bool efi_image_authenticate(void *efi, size_t efi_size)
{
return true;
}
#endif /* CONFIG_EFI_SECURE_BOOT */
The purpose of this commit is removing #if compilation switch,
so I keep the original implementation, always return true
if CONFIG_EFI_SECURE_BOOT is disabled.
Thanks,
Masahisa
>
> Hello Masahisa,
>
> I did not see any reply yet. Was a mail lost?
>
> Best regards
>
> Heinrich
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 1/2] efi_loader: expose efi_image_parse() even if UEFI Secure Boot is disabled
2021-05-10 0:49 ` Masahisa Kojima
@ 2021-05-10 2:07 ` Takahiro Akashi
2021-05-10 22:06 ` Masahisa Kojima
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Takahiro Akashi @ 2021-05-10 2:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 09:49:03AM +0900, Masahisa Kojima wrote:
> Hi Heinrich,
>
> Sorry for the late reply.
>
> On Sat, 8 May 2021 at 23:08, Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> wrote:
> >
> > On 4/28/21 3:16 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> > > On 28.04.21 14:19, Masahisa Kojima wrote:
> > <snip />
> > >> /**
> > >> * cmp_pe_section() - compare virtual addresses of two PE image sections
> > >> * @arg1: pointer to pointer to first section header
> > >> @@ -504,6 +565,9 @@ static bool efi_image_authenticate(void *efi, size_t efi_size)
> > >>
> > >> EFI_PRINT("%s: Enter, %d\n", __func__, ret);
> > >>
> > >> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EFI_SECURE_BOOT))
> > >> + return true;
> > >> +
> > >
> > > Why is this needed? Doesn't efi_secure_boot_enabled() return false in
> > > this case?
>
> The original code is as follows.
Heinrich's concern was, I guess, that
> > >> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EFI_SECURE_BOOT))
> > >> + return true;
and the succeeding check,
if (!efi_secure_boot_enabled())
return true;
are somehow redundant.
But in the latter case, I'm afraid that a compiler cannot optimize out
the rest of the logic in efi_image_authenticate().
-Takahiro Akashi
> #ifdef CONFIG_EFI_SECURE_BOOT
> static bool efi_image_authenticate(void *efi, size_t efi_size) {
>
> < snip >
>
> }
> #else
> static bool efi_image_authenticate(void *efi, size_t efi_size)
> {
> return true;
> }
> #endif /* CONFIG_EFI_SECURE_BOOT */
>
> The purpose of this commit is removing #if compilation switch,
> so I keep the original implementation, always return true
> if CONFIG_EFI_SECURE_BOOT is disabled.
>
> Thanks,
> Masahisa
>
> >
> > Hello Masahisa,
> >
> > I did not see any reply yet. Was a mail lost?
> >
> > Best regards
> >
> > Heinrich
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 1/2] efi_loader: expose efi_image_parse() even if UEFI Secure Boot is disabled
2021-05-10 2:07 ` Takahiro Akashi
@ 2021-05-10 22:06 ` Masahisa Kojima
2021-05-12 6:57 ` Masahisa Kojima
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Masahisa Kojima @ 2021-05-10 22:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On Mon, 10 May 2021 at 11:07, Takahiro Akashi
<takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 09:49:03AM +0900, Masahisa Kojima wrote:
> > Hi Heinrich,
> >
> > Sorry for the late reply.
> >
> > On Sat, 8 May 2021 at 23:08, Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 4/28/21 3:16 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> > > > On 28.04.21 14:19, Masahisa Kojima wrote:
> > > <snip />
> > > >> /**
> > > >> * cmp_pe_section() - compare virtual addresses of two PE image sections
> > > >> * @arg1: pointer to pointer to first section header
> > > >> @@ -504,6 +565,9 @@ static bool efi_image_authenticate(void *efi, size_t efi_size)
> > > >>
> > > >> EFI_PRINT("%s: Enter, %d\n", __func__, ret);
> > > >>
> > > >> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EFI_SECURE_BOOT))
> > > >> + return true;
> > > >> +
> > > >
> > > > Why is this needed? Doesn't efi_secure_boot_enabled() return false in
> > > > this case?
> >
> > The original code is as follows.
>
> Heinrich's concern was, I guess, that
>
> > > >> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EFI_SECURE_BOOT))
> > > >> + return true;
>
> and the succeeding check,
>
> if (!efi_secure_boot_enabled())
> return true;
>
> are somehow redundant.
> But in the latter case, I'm afraid that a compiler cannot optimize out
> the rest of the logic in efi_image_authenticate().
Hi Heinrich, Takahiro,
Sorry for the late reply.
I now understand Takahiro's concern.
If I remove following check,
> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EFI_SECURE_BOOT))
> + return true;
compiler optimization does not work and link error occurs.
lib/built-in.o: In function `efi_image_authenticate':
/home/ubuntu/SynQuacer/ledge/u-boot/lib/efi_loader/efi_image_loader.c:601:
undefined reference to `efi_sigstore_parse_sigdb'
/home/ubuntu/SynQuacer/ledge/u-boot/lib/efi_loader/efi_image_loader.c:607:
undefined reference to `efi_sigstore_parse_sigdb'
/home/ubuntu/SynQuacer/ledge/u-boot/lib/efi_loader/efi_image_loader.c:613:
undefined reference to `efi_signature_lookup_digest'
I would like to propose two resolution.
1) keep if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EFI_SECURE_BOOT)) condition
2) remove if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EFI_SECURE_BOOT)) condition and
always include efi_signature.c as compilation target.
Please advise.
Thanks,
Masahisa
>
> -Takahiro Akashi
>
>
> > #ifdef CONFIG_EFI_SECURE_BOOT
> > static bool efi_image_authenticate(void *efi, size_t efi_size) {
> >
> > < snip >
> >
> > }
> > #else
> > static bool efi_image_authenticate(void *efi, size_t efi_size)
> > {
> > return true;
> > }
> > #endif /* CONFIG_EFI_SECURE_BOOT */
> >
> > The purpose of this commit is removing #if compilation switch,
> > so I keep the original implementation, always return true
> > if CONFIG_EFI_SECURE_BOOT is disabled.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Masahisa
> >
> > >
> > > Hello Masahisa,
> > >
> > > I did not see any reply yet. Was a mail lost?
> > >
> > > Best regards
> > >
> > > Heinrich
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 1/2] efi_loader: expose efi_image_parse() even if UEFI Secure Boot is disabled
2021-05-10 22:06 ` Masahisa Kojima
@ 2021-05-12 6:57 ` Masahisa Kojima
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Masahisa Kojima @ 2021-05-12 6:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Hi Heinrich,
I'm about to send v4 patch series.
> 1) keep if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EFI_SECURE_BOOT)) condition
I chose this option, but I reverted #ifdef statement instead of using
"if (IS_ENABLED)" because I think it is better not to rely on compiler
optimization.
> 2) remove if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EFI_SECURE_BOOT)) condition and
> always include efi_signature.c as compilation target.
In this option, CONFIG_PKCS7_VERIFY is required for EFI_TCG2_PROTOCOL
just for successful build.
To minimize dependency, I did not proceed with 2).
Please kindly review v4.
Thanks,
Masahisa
On Tue, 11 May 2021 at 07:06, Masahisa Kojima
<masahisa.kojima@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 10 May 2021 at 11:07, Takahiro Akashi
> <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 09:49:03AM +0900, Masahisa Kojima wrote:
> > > Hi Heinrich,
> > >
> > > Sorry for the late reply.
> > >
> > > On Sat, 8 May 2021 at 23:08, Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 4/28/21 3:16 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> > > > > On 28.04.21 14:19, Masahisa Kojima wrote:
> > > > <snip />
> > > > >> /**
> > > > >> * cmp_pe_section() - compare virtual addresses of two PE image sections
> > > > >> * @arg1: pointer to pointer to first section header
> > > > >> @@ -504,6 +565,9 @@ static bool efi_image_authenticate(void *efi, size_t efi_size)
> > > > >>
> > > > >> EFI_PRINT("%s: Enter, %d\n", __func__, ret);
> > > > >>
> > > > >> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EFI_SECURE_BOOT))
> > > > >> + return true;
> > > > >> +
> > > > >
> > > > > Why is this needed? Doesn't efi_secure_boot_enabled() return false in
> > > > > this case?
> > >
> > > The original code is as follows.
> >
> > Heinrich's concern was, I guess, that
> >
> > > > >> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EFI_SECURE_BOOT))
> > > > >> + return true;
> >
> > and the succeeding check,
> >
> > if (!efi_secure_boot_enabled())
> > return true;
> >
> > are somehow redundant.
> > But in the latter case, I'm afraid that a compiler cannot optimize out
> > the rest of the logic in efi_image_authenticate().
>
> Hi Heinrich, Takahiro,
>
> Sorry for the late reply.
> I now understand Takahiro's concern.
> If I remove following check,
>
> > + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EFI_SECURE_BOOT))
> > + return true;
>
> compiler optimization does not work and link error occurs.
>
> lib/built-in.o: In function `efi_image_authenticate':
> /home/ubuntu/SynQuacer/ledge/u-boot/lib/efi_loader/efi_image_loader.c:601:
> undefined reference to `efi_sigstore_parse_sigdb'
> /home/ubuntu/SynQuacer/ledge/u-boot/lib/efi_loader/efi_image_loader.c:607:
> undefined reference to `efi_sigstore_parse_sigdb'
> /home/ubuntu/SynQuacer/ledge/u-boot/lib/efi_loader/efi_image_loader.c:613:
> undefined reference to `efi_signature_lookup_digest'
>
> I would like to propose two resolution.
>
> 1) keep if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EFI_SECURE_BOOT)) condition
> 2) remove if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EFI_SECURE_BOOT)) condition and
> always include efi_signature.c as compilation target.
>
> Please advise.
>
> Thanks,
> Masahisa
>
>
> >
> > -Takahiro Akashi
> >
> >
> > > #ifdef CONFIG_EFI_SECURE_BOOT
> > > static bool efi_image_authenticate(void *efi, size_t efi_size) {
> > >
> > > < snip >
> > >
> > > }
> > > #else
> > > static bool efi_image_authenticate(void *efi, size_t efi_size)
> > > {
> > > return true;
> > > }
> > > #endif /* CONFIG_EFI_SECURE_BOOT */
> > >
> > > The purpose of this commit is removing #if compilation switch,
> > > so I keep the original implementation, always return true
> > > if CONFIG_EFI_SECURE_BOOT is disabled.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Masahisa
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Hello Masahisa,
> > > >
> > > > I did not see any reply yet. Was a mail lost?
> > > >
> > > > Best regards
> > > >
> > > > Heinrich
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-05-12 6:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-04-28 12:19 [PATCH v3 0/2] PE/COFF measurement support Masahisa Kojima
2021-04-28 12:19 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] efi_loader: expose efi_image_parse() even if UEFI Secure Boot is disabled Masahisa Kojima
2021-04-28 13:16 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2021-05-08 14:08 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2021-05-10 0:49 ` Masahisa Kojima
2021-05-10 2:07 ` Takahiro Akashi
2021-05-10 22:06 ` Masahisa Kojima
2021-05-12 6:57 ` Masahisa Kojima
2021-04-28 12:19 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] efi_loader: add PE/COFF image measurement Masahisa Kojima
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox