From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3463DC47092 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 14:03:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phobos.denx.de (phobos.denx.de [85.214.62.61]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7891613BF for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 14:03:22 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org E7891613BF Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=nic.cz Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de Received: from h2850616.stratoserver.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by phobos.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13FD782F18; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 16:03:21 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=nic.cz Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=nic.cz header.i=@nic.cz header.b="LGhLRU1S"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by phobos.denx.de (Postfix, from userid 109) id 9DF4682F18; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 16:03:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.nic.cz (lists.nic.cz [217.31.204.67]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by phobos.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14D2980239 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 16:03:14 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=nic.cz Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=marek.behun@nic.cz Received: from dellmb (unknown [IPv6:2001:1488:fffe:6:8747:7254:5571:3010]) by mail.nic.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 82C7214095A; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 16:03:13 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=nic.cz; s=default; t=1622642593; bh=N9rV9kIzhwU9XMFbFXmihWDirHdHJCQjT68ij5pWUNI=; h=Date:From:To; b=LGhLRU1SnfTPQlunds1kLUcvYGf0Ay3PuHTkvDTFb+CSBv81HhNGC3UKT+bCsxVDN sCH85pgUzBNrIHdcue6qDuhvQVHV9LKS8eViigo9Rr6lBWU1giDUr3J4ADGFbfQgZm ncpI9lGs/YguRh+7bdxKgFCrj8Bg4SVhdOMSAZwI= Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 16:03:13 +0200 From: Marek =?UTF-8?B?QmVow7pu?= To: Jagan Teki Cc: U-Boot-Denx , Tom Rini , Priyanka Jain , Simon Glass , Heiko Schocher , Patrick Delaunay , Patrice CHOTARD , Miquel Raynal Subject: Re: [PATCH u-boot-dm + u-boot-spi v4 00/10] Support SPI NORs and OF partitions in `mtd list` Message-ID: <20210602160313.0b2997c1@dellmb> In-Reply-To: References: <20210526120826.8045-1-marek.behun@nic.cz> <20210526195429.41395a0d@dellmb> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: u-boot@lists.denx.de X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: U-Boot discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de Sender: "U-Boot" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.4 at phobos.denx.de X-Virus-Status: Clean On Wed, 26 May 2021 23:34:18 +0530 Jagan Teki wrote: > On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 11:25 PM Marek Beh=C3=BAn > wrote: > > > > On Wed, 26 May 2021 22:28:34 +0530 > > Jagan Teki wrote: > > =20 > > > This series have some conflicts wrt my series about MTD UCLASS > > > migration. Does this bypass that series? > > > > > > Jagan. =20 > > > > Jagan, I was working on top of Tom's master branch... Are the > > conflicts big? =20 >=20 > Not on master, but master with my MTD UCLASS changes in mailing list. > Let me figure it out. I will update it. >=20 > Jagan. Jagan, any news about this series? Can you review this? Who whould be applying this? Thanks. Marek