From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PULL_REQUEST,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 461CEC48BE8 for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 01:49:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phobos.denx.de (phobos.denx.de [85.214.62.61]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3218613D5 for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 01:49:34 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A3218613D5 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=andestech.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de Received: from h2850616.stratoserver.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by phobos.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E555F80799; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 03:49:31 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=andestech.com Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de Received: by phobos.denx.de (Postfix, from userid 109) id 0753780D17; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 03:49:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ATCSQR.andestech.com (atcsqr.andestech.com [60.248.187.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by phobos.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8A3080799 for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 03:49:25 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=andestech.com Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ycliang@andestech.com Received: from mail.andestech.com (atcpcs16.andestech.com [10.0.1.222]) by ATCSQR.andestech.com with ESMTP id 15H1n7NC099060; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 09:49:07 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from ycliang@andestech.com) Received: from andestech.com (10.0.15.65) by ATCPCS16.andestech.com (10.0.1.222) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.498.0; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 09:49:06 +0800 Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 09:49:04 +0800 From: Leo Liang To: Tom Rini CC: , , Subject: Re: [PULL v2] u-boot-riscv/next Message-ID: <20210617014903.GA16800@andestech.com> References: <20210616124840.GB19880@andestech.com> <20210616145918.GU9516@bill-the-cat> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210616145918.GU9516@bill-the-cat> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Originating-IP: [10.0.15.65] X-DNSRBL: X-MAIL: ATCSQR.andestech.com 15H1n7NC099060 X-BeenThere: u-boot@lists.denx.de X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: U-Boot discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de Sender: "U-Boot" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.2 at phobos.denx.de X-Virus-Status: Clean On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 10:59:18AM -0400, Tom Rini wrote: > On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 08:48:40PM +0800, Leo Liang wrote: > > > Hi Tom, > > > > Please pull u-boot-riscv/next into -next. > > > > The following changes on the "next" branch since commit c4737cd594b5c4c47aff789fc53f7dd36ed03c94: > > > > Merge tag 'xilinx-for-v2021.07-rc5' of https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-microblaze (2021-06-11 08:29:34 -0400) > > > > are available in the Git repository at: > > > > git@source.denx.de:u-boot/custodians/u-boot-riscv.git > > > > for you to fetch changes up to d1d256e1635684615182aaf62b077233c3360f7e: > > > > riscv: andes_plic: Fix riscv_get_ipi() mask (2021-06-16 16:20:13 +0800) > > > > CI result shows no issue: https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-riscv/-/pipelines/7857 > > > > This is not based on u-boot/next, but rather on u-boot/master. Is there > something currently in master that you need for this PR? If so, I can > merge in a later -rc tag. Otherwise please rebase this on next itself, > thanks. > > -- > Tom Hi Tom, Sorry for the confusion. I think I will follow Bin's suggestion, split it into two PRs, the fixes for -rc, and k210 clk for next, and re-send it later. Thanks for your help and heads up! Best regards, Leo