* Zynq MPSoC - secure boot
@ 2021-06-21 17:27 Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz, Foundries
2021-06-22 7:02 ` Michal Simek
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz, Foundries @ 2021-06-21 17:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: michal.simek; +Cc: u-boot
hi Michal,
Is secure boot supported using SPL? or is there a plan for it (maybe a
branch somewhere that I can work from and contribute to?).
ATM looking into how to write the key sha to the fuses without Vivado.
thanks for any information that you might have,
jorge
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Zynq MPSoC - secure boot
2021-06-21 17:27 Zynq MPSoC - secure boot Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz, Foundries
@ 2021-06-22 7:02 ` Michal Simek
2021-06-22 10:58 ` Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz, Foundries
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Michal Simek @ 2021-06-22 7:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz, Foundries, michal.simek; +Cc: u-boot
Hi,
On 6/21/21 7:27 PM, Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz, Foundries wrote:
> hi Michal,
>
> Is secure boot supported using SPL? or is there a plan for it (maybe a
> branch somewhere that I can work from and contribute to?).
I have it on my list but haven't had a time to dig into it yet.
>
> ATM looking into how to write the key sha to the fuses without Vivado.
The first level of secure boot will be using integrated bootrom
mechanism and only vivado bootgen can generate images for it. It means
maybe you will be able to avoid Vivado for efuses programming but not
for image generation as of now.
As I said I have never had a time to look at it that's why I don't know
enough to guide you how to do it.
Thanks,
Michal
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Zynq MPSoC - secure boot
2021-06-22 7:02 ` Michal Simek
@ 2021-06-22 10:58 ` Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz, Foundries
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz, Foundries @ 2021-06-22 10:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Simek; +Cc: Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz, Foundries, u-boot
On 22/06/21, Michal Simek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 6/21/21 7:27 PM, Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz, Foundries wrote:
> > hi Michal,
> >
> > Is secure boot supported using SPL? or is there a plan for it (maybe a
> > branch somewhere that I can work from and contribute to?).
>
> I have it on my list but haven't had a time to dig into it yet.
>
> >
> > ATM looking into how to write the key sha to the fuses without Vivado.
>
> The first level of secure boot will be using integrated bootrom
> mechanism and only vivado bootgen can generate images for it. It means
> maybe you will be able to avoid Vivado for efuses programming but not
> for image generation as of now.
um, that is a pity - I was hoping it would be as simple as working
with iMX since the basic principles are the same...but ok, the
integration of the tools are on this ocasion somewhat behind.
>
> As I said I have never had a time to look at it that's why I don't know
> enough to guide you how to do it.
sure np, will browse FSBL and some docs. thanks for your quick response.
>
> Thanks,
> Michal
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-06-22 10:58 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-06-21 17:27 Zynq MPSoC - secure boot Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz, Foundries
2021-06-22 7:02 ` Michal Simek
2021-06-22 10:58 ` Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz, Foundries
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox