public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 1/2] w1: w1-gpio: claim the gpio with correct initial flag
@ 2021-06-23 14:20 Eugen Hristev
  2021-06-23 14:20 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: at91: fix the GPIO polarity for onewire Eugen Hristev
  2021-07-06 12:18 ` [PATCH 1/2] w1: w1-gpio: claim the gpio with correct initial flag Eugen.Hristev
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Eugen Hristev @ 2021-06-23 14:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot; +Cc: Eugen Hristev

gpio_request_by_name should be called with proper flags.
The 0 value flag is invalid, and causes bad initialization of the gpio.

Signed-off-by: Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@microchip.com>
---
 drivers/w1/w1-gpio.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/w1/w1-gpio.c b/drivers/w1/w1-gpio.c
index 3b0ead6f6d..9346f810ce 100644
--- a/drivers/w1/w1-gpio.c
+++ b/drivers/w1/w1-gpio.c
@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ static int w1_gpio_of_to_plat(struct udevice *dev)
 	struct w1_gpio_pdata *pdata = dev_get_plat(dev);
 	int ret;
 
-	ret = gpio_request_by_name(dev, "gpios", 0, &pdata->gpio, 0);
+	ret = gpio_request_by_name(dev, "gpios", 0, &pdata->gpio, GPIOD_IS_IN);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		printf("Error claiming GPIO %d\n", ret);
 
-- 
2.25.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-07-06 12:18 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-06-23 14:20 [PATCH 1/2] w1: w1-gpio: claim the gpio with correct initial flag Eugen Hristev
2021-06-23 14:20 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: at91: fix the GPIO polarity for onewire Eugen Hristev
2021-07-06 12:18 ` [PATCH 1/2] w1: w1-gpio: claim the gpio with correct initial flag Eugen.Hristev

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox