From: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
To: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
Cc: "Simon Glass" <sjg@chromium.org>, "Pali Rohár" <pali@kernel.org>,
"Ilias Apalodimas" <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>,
"Alexander Graf" <agraf@csgraf.de>,
"U-Boot Mailing List" <u-boot@lists.denx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] efi: Make EBBR optional
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2021 09:48:27 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210628134827.GA9516@bill-the-cat> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <82577bf9-dce6-3189-6b44-4a405ede3931@gmx.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1970 bytes --]
On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 11:48:00AM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 6/28/21 3:48 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Add a new Kconfig option for EBBR so that the naming is more explicit.
> > Make EFI_LOADER depend on it.
> >
> > Avoid enabling the options (EBBR / EFI_LOADER) by default, to save space.
>
> NAK
>
> Operating systems like Fedora, OpenBSD, FreeBSD require UEFI support.
>
> See discussion in
> https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2021-June/452947.html
I also think this is taking things in the wrong direction. It was an
intentional "make EFI_LOADER default when supported" when we introduced
it, and I still think that's the right overall choice. There's a whole
lot of non-customization going on when reference designs are converted
to products or other reference designs.
> > Also add dependencies on driver model and OF_CONTROL, since boards which
> > have not migrated to these should not be using new features like EBBR.
>
> Only supporting devices using the driver model in the UEFI sub-system is
> fine with me. CONFIG_BLK=y is another possible requirement.
Adding these would be good. And may allow for the code to be
simplified?
> We still have 101 defconfigs not using CONFIG_DM=y. Shouldn't they be
> eliminated?
They will be eliminated after v2022.01, following the same 2 years of
"the deadline has passed" that's being used by the board removals I've
been posting so far this year.
> We have a low number of boards using CONFIG_DM=y and
> CONFIG_OF_CONTROL=n. Shouldn't they be moved to CONFIG_OF_CONTROL=y and
> that symbol be eliminated?
No, we don't require OF_CONTROL intentionally so that other smaller
mechanisms can be used.
[snip]
> We have 274 defconfigs with CONFIG_PARTITIONS=y and CONFIG_BLK=n.
> Shouldn't they be converted or eliminated?
Some number of them will be, I think there's one or two actual funny
cases on how that code is used however.
--
Tom
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 659 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-28 13:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-28 1:48 [PATCH 0/7] efi: Various tidy-ups and drop the default Simon Glass
2021-06-28 1:48 ` [PATCH 1/7] configs: Resync with savedefconfig Simon Glass
2021-06-28 1:48 ` [PATCH 2/7] Makefile: Drop include/asm directory as well as symlink Simon Glass
2021-06-28 1:48 ` [PATCH 3/7] disk: Tidy up #ifdefs in part_efi Simon Glass
2021-06-28 11:20 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2021-06-28 13:50 ` Tom Rini
2021-06-28 16:18 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2021-06-28 1:48 ` [PATCH 4/7] Use LIB_UUID with ACPIGEN and FS_BTRFS Simon Glass
2021-06-28 1:48 ` [PATCH 5/7] Allow efi_loader header to be included always Simon Glass
2021-06-28 11:02 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2021-06-28 1:48 ` [PATCH 6/7] lib: Create a new Kconfig option for charset conversion Simon Glass
2021-06-28 10:37 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2021-06-28 1:48 ` [PATCH 7/7] efi: Make EBBR optional Simon Glass
2021-06-28 9:48 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2021-06-28 13:48 ` Tom Rini [this message]
2021-06-28 8:38 ` [PATCH 0/7] efi: Various tidy-ups and drop the default Mark Kettenis
2021-06-28 8:59 ` Ilias Apalodimas
2021-06-28 13:37 ` Tom Rini
2021-06-28 14:18 ` Simon Glass
2021-06-28 15:20 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2021-06-28 16:26 ` Simon Glass
2021-06-28 17:09 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2021-06-28 18:02 ` Simon Glass
2021-06-28 17:27 ` Tom Rini
2021-06-28 18:08 ` Simon Glass
2021-06-29 12:56 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2021-06-29 14:01 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2021-06-29 14:14 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2021-06-28 17:49 ` Mark Kettenis
2021-07-02 19:05 ` Simon Glass
2021-07-02 19:48 ` Mark Kettenis
2021-07-02 20:09 ` Tom Rini
2021-07-02 20:47 ` Simon Glass
2021-06-28 14:25 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210628134827.GA9516@bill-the-cat \
--to=trini@konsulko.com \
--cc=agraf@csgraf.de \
--cc=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \
--cc=pali@kernel.org \
--cc=sjg@chromium.org \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
--cc=xypron.glpk@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox