From: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
To: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Cc: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>,
u-boot@lists.denx.de, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@foss.arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: Add (back) VExpress boards support
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2021 15:15:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210629151552.756ab8b2@slackpad.fritz.box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210629121122.GV9516@bill-the-cat>
On Tue, 29 Jun 2021 08:11:22 -0400
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 12:45:55PM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
>
> > The v2021.07 merge window saw the removal of the Arm Ltd. Versatile
> > Express platform, along with their CA5, CA9 and TC2 boards. The trigger
> > was the missing conversion of the MMC driver.
> >
> > Some folks complained about that internally, so bring those boards back,
> > but better than ever:
> > - Use DM and OF_CONTROL for all the boards. Use the .dts files from the
> > latest Linux kernel (5.13) for that.
> > - Move the board selection choice into the platform's Kconfig.
> > - Clean up some shared config and common definitions.
> > - Drop obsolete features like ATAGs support.
> > - Switch to the DM_ETH version of the SMC911X Ethernet driver.
> > - Drop MMC support.
> >
> > The PL180 MMC driver actually supports DM_MMC, but that requires a
> > DM_GPIO driver for the card detect GPIO, which we don't have. This
> > specific GPIO is actually handled via the "sysregs" device, so we would
> > need a driver for that. QEMU does not emulate this part, also the DT
> > description is somewhat "special", so this is left for later.
> >
> > This version compiles without any warning for all three boards now.
> > Tested on QEMU.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
> > ---
> > Hi,
> >
> > this relies on the SMC911x driver DT changes, as posted here:
> > https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2021-June/452989.html
> > I put a version with the changes broken down here:
> > https://github.com/Andre-ARM/u-boot/commits/tc2-history
> >
> > This was tested on QEMU, for vexpress_ca15_tc2_defconfig with:
> > $ qemu-system-arm -M vexpress-a15,secure=on -cpu cortex-a15 -m 1G -smp 1 \
> > -drive file=tramp-tc2.bin,if=pflash,format=raw,read-only \
> > -device loader,file=u-boot.bin,addr=0x80800000 -nographic
> >
> > Where tramp-tc2.bin is a trampoline replacing the board's firmware:
> > 00000000 00 00 a0 e3 80 00 48 e3 10 ff 2f e1
> > (mov r0, #0; movt r0, #0x8080; bx r0)
> >
> > The vexpress_ca9x4_defconfig uses a different memory map, so the runes are:
> > $ qemu-system-arm -M vexpress-a9 -cpu cortex-a9 -m 1G -smp 1 \
> > -drive file=tramp-ca9.bin,if=pflash,format=raw,read-only \
> > -device loader,file=u-boot.bin,addr=0x60800000 -nographic
> >
> > tramp-ca9.bin:
> > 00000000 00 00 a0 e3 80 00 46 e3 10 ff 2f e1
> > (mov r0, #0; movt r0, #0x6080; bx r0)
>
> My big question is how do we run this in CI? Or does it not _need_ that
> firmware file to really exist? Or is there a pending change to
> https://gitlab.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot-test-hooks.git to generate / just
> have exist those magic empty bins? Thanks!
So from digging into this I see that this loads U-Boot's ELF build, via
QEMU's -kernel parameter. Which is fine, but not really what is
happening on real hardware.
I checked and the v2021.04 version worked with this approach, but my
build does not.
I will have a look into this now.
Thanks!
Andre
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-29 14:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-29 11:45 [PATCH] arm: Add (back) VExpress boards support Andre Przywara
2021-06-29 12:11 ` Tom Rini
2021-06-29 14:15 ` Andre Przywara [this message]
2021-06-29 16:52 ` Andre Przywara
2021-06-29 18:03 ` Tom Rini
2021-06-30 0:12 ` Andre Przywara
2021-06-30 0:52 ` Tom Rini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210629151552.756ab8b2@slackpad.fritz.box \
--to=andre.przywara@arm.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=liviu.dudau@foss.arm.com \
--cc=sjg@chromium.org \
--cc=trini@konsulko.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox