From: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
To: "Pali Rohár" <pali@kernel.org>
Cc: "Sean Anderson" <sean.anderson@seco.com>,
"Simon Glass" <sjg@chromium.org>,
"Heinrich Schuchardt" <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>,
"Alexander Graf" <agraf@csgraf.de>,
"Huan Wang" <alison.wang@nxp.com>,
"Angelo Dureghello" <angelo@sysam.it>,
"Wolfgang Denk" <wd@denx.de>,
"Priyanka Jain" <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>,
"Christophe Leroy" <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>,
"Bin Meng" <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>,
"Marek Behún" <marek.behun@nic.cz>,
"U-Boot Mailing List" <u-boot@lists.denx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] Remove including timestamp.h in version.h
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2021 18:15:55 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210804221555.GB858@bill-the-cat> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210804221429.wzw23up3ahoswuyd@pali>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3198 bytes --]
On Thu, Aug 05, 2021 at 12:14:29AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 August 2021 18:09:14 Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 04, 2021 at 05:43:41PM -0400, Sean Anderson wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 8/2/21 3:21 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > > Hi Pali,
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 2 Aug 2021 at 07:20, Pali Rohár <pali@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Header file version.h does not use anything from timestamp.h. Including of
> > > > > timestamp.h has side effect which cause recompiling object file at every
> > > > > make run because timestamp.h changes at every run.
> > > > >
> > > > > So remove timestamp.h from version.h and include timestamp.h in files
> > > > > which needs it.
> > > > >
> > > > > This change reduce recompilation time of final U-Boot binary when U-Boot
> > > > > source files were not changed as less source files needs to be recompiled.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár <pali@kernel.org>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > arch/arm/mach-rockchip/tpl.c | 4 ++++
> > > > > board/work-microwave/work_92105/work_92105_display.c | 1 +
> > > > > cmd/version.c | 1 +
> > > > > common/spl/spl.c | 4 ++++
> > > > > drivers/rtc/emul_rtc.c | 2 +-
> > > > > include/version.h | 2 --
> > > > > 6 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
> > > >
> > > > I assume we do actually want to regenerate the timestamp when U-Boot
> > > > builds, even if nothing has changed. Is that right?
> > >
> > > I know this is the current behavior, but it would be nice if this was
> > > not the case. If one is building U-Boot as part of a larger project, one
> > > might want to have a makefile rule like
> > >
> > > u-boot/u-boot.bin:
> > > $(MAKE) -C u-boot $(@F)
> > >
> > > but u-boot/u-boot.bin will always be remade even if no changes have been
> > > done. This will cause make to remake all dependents of U-Boot as well
> > > (which can be rather time-consuming).
> > >
> > > At the moment, I just use U-Boot as an order-only dependency and remake
> > > it manually. But I would love it if U-Boot was only remade if
> > > dependencies had actually changed, since this would make it easier to
> > > integrate it with the rest of my build system.
> >
> > Note that with this series applied, if you made use of
> > SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH, nothing would be rebuilt.
>
> IIRC with SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH nothing would be rebuilt also without
> applying this my patch series.
Correct, it does not.
> > That may or may not make
> > sense however, in your case. This series does get us closer to being
> > able to do what the linux kernel does as there's now just one place
> > rather than a bunch of places that are rebuilt.
>
> Just small correction. Even with this patch series there would not be
> just one place. There are still more places but this patch series reduce
> number of these places.
Ah, I only saw one place in my limited testing this morning.
--
Tom
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 659 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-04 22:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-02 13:18 [PATCH 00/11] Reduce usage of timestamp macros Pali Rohár
2021-08-02 13:18 ` [PATCH 01/11] Remove #include <timestamp.h> from files which do not need it Pali Rohár
2021-08-02 13:58 ` Tom Rini
2021-09-23 2:07 ` Tom Rini
2021-08-02 13:18 ` [PATCH 02/11] Remove #include <version.h> " Pali Rohár
2021-08-02 13:58 ` Tom Rini
2021-09-23 2:07 ` Tom Rini
2021-08-02 13:18 ` [PATCH 03/11] efi_loader: Use directly version_string variable Pali Rohár
2021-08-02 20:04 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2021-08-03 7:37 ` Ilias Apalodimas
2021-09-23 2:07 ` Tom Rini
2021-08-02 13:18 ` [PATCH 04/11] version: Move version_string[] from version.h to version_string.h Pali Rohár
2021-08-02 13:58 ` Tom Rini
2021-09-23 2:08 ` Tom Rini
2021-08-02 13:18 ` [PATCH 05/11] m68k: mcf: Remove overloading version_string Pali Rohár
2021-09-23 2:08 ` Tom Rini
2021-08-02 13:18 ` [PATCH 06/11] version: Put version_string[] variable into section .text_version_string Pali Rohár
2021-08-02 13:58 ` Tom Rini
2021-09-16 17:30 ` [PATCH] xtensa: Put U-Boot version string at correct place by linker script Tom Rini
2021-09-16 19:38 ` Francesco Dolcini
2021-09-16 19:42 ` Tom Rini
2021-09-16 19:50 ` Francesco Dolcini
2021-09-16 20:13 ` Tom Rini
2021-09-16 20:23 ` Francesco Dolcini
2021-09-17 5:21 ` Max Filippov
2021-09-17 12:02 ` Tom Rini
2021-09-17 5:14 ` Max Filippov
2021-09-17 12:04 ` Tom Rini
2021-09-17 12:30 ` Max Filippov
2021-08-02 13:18 ` [PATCH 07/11] powerpc: mpc: " Pali Rohár
2021-08-08 11:20 ` [PATCH v2] " Pali Rohár
2021-08-08 11:36 ` Pali Rohár
2021-08-24 5:03 ` Christophe Leroy
2021-08-24 9:46 ` Wolfgang Denk
2021-08-24 5:28 ` Christophe Leroy
2021-08-24 11:28 ` Pali Rohár
2021-09-16 19:17 ` Tom Rini
2021-09-16 19:56 ` [PATCH 1/1] powerpc: Drop version_string placement optimization Tom Rini
2021-09-23 2:09 ` Tom Rini
2021-08-02 13:18 ` [PATCH 08/11] version: Do not make version_string[] variable as a weak Pali Rohár
2021-08-02 13:58 ` Tom Rini
2021-09-23 2:08 ` Tom Rini
2021-08-02 13:18 ` [PATCH 09/11] x86: quark: MRC: Remove U_BOOT_DATE and U_BOOT_TIME from debug log Pali Rohár
2021-08-02 19:21 ` Simon Glass
2021-08-02 23:25 ` Bin Meng
2021-09-23 2:08 ` Tom Rini
2021-08-02 13:18 ` [PATCH 10/11] version: Remove global macro U_BOOT_VERSION_STRING from version.h Pali Rohár
2021-08-02 13:59 ` Tom Rini
2021-09-23 2:08 ` Tom Rini
2021-08-02 13:18 ` [PATCH 11/11] Remove including timestamp.h in version.h Pali Rohár
2021-08-02 19:21 ` Simon Glass
2021-08-02 19:42 ` Pali Rohár
2021-08-02 21:31 ` Tom Rini
2021-08-04 5:59 ` Wolfgang Denk
2021-08-04 12:44 ` Tom Rini
2021-08-04 14:36 ` Simon Glass
2021-08-04 14:40 ` Tom Rini
2021-08-04 21:46 ` Pali Rohár
2021-08-04 21:43 ` Sean Anderson
2021-08-04 21:52 ` Pali Rohár
2021-08-04 22:09 ` Tom Rini
2021-08-04 22:14 ` Pali Rohár
2021-08-04 22:15 ` Tom Rini [this message]
2021-08-04 22:22 ` Pali Rohár
2021-09-23 2:08 ` Tom Rini
2021-08-17 11:02 ` [PATCH 00/11] Reduce usage of timestamp macros Pali Rohár
2021-08-17 13:40 ` Tom Rini
2021-09-01 20:59 ` Tom Rini
2021-09-01 21:05 ` Pali Rohár
2021-09-01 21:17 ` Tom Rini
2021-09-01 21:28 ` Pali Rohár
2021-09-01 21:33 ` Tom Rini
2021-09-01 21:44 ` Pali Rohár
2021-09-01 21:49 ` Pali Rohár
2021-09-10 20:56 ` Pali Rohár
2021-09-10 21:18 ` Tom Rini
2021-09-01 21:56 ` Tom Rini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210804221555.GB858@bill-the-cat \
--to=trini@konsulko.com \
--cc=agraf@csgraf.de \
--cc=alison.wang@nxp.com \
--cc=angelo@sysam.it \
--cc=bmeng.cn@gmail.com \
--cc=christophe.leroy@c-s.fr \
--cc=marek.behun@nic.cz \
--cc=pali@kernel.org \
--cc=priyanka.jain@nxp.com \
--cc=sean.anderson@seco.com \
--cc=sjg@chromium.org \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
--cc=wd@denx.de \
--cc=xypron.glpk@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox