From: KASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
To: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Cc: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>,
U-Boot Mailing List <u-boot@lists.denx.de>,
Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>,
Alexander Graf <agraf@csgraf.de>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu@linaro.org>,
Sughosh Ganu <sughosh.ganu@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] efi: Minimal revert to rodata change
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2021 09:13:21 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210806001321.GA44938@laputa> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPnjgZ1NKqkagRqpLU0C6W91JKpDPkrCBksr4dRxQVhgG2XN_A@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Aug 05, 2021 at 09:46:07AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Heinrich,
>
> On Thu, 5 Aug 2021 at 09:29, Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 02.08.21 16:44, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > The changes to move from devicetree to rodata take things in the wrong
> > > direction for various reasons:
> > >
> > > - devicetree is where config should be stored
> >
> > We are not talking about configuration here at all.
>
> I thought we were talking about the public key. That is run-time
> config in my book, just like the devicetree itself, which controls all
> the devices.
>
> >
> > > - it provides no memory production in any case, particularly when U-Boot
> >
> > No clue what you mean by "memory production".
>
> memory protection. But it turns out this is pointless anyway. We
> discussed it at length in the contributor call. We came down to one
What was clarified and decided in that meeting?
I know you have a meeting note, but it was not very clear for me
which direction the discussion is heading now.
# Yes, I should have been there, but ...
# Simon, if possible, please announce the agenda a bit earlier
# so that I can notice that. I'm usually in the bed at that time :)
I don't think that memory protection is really a matter if there is
no assumption that the storage where the firmware resides are
securely protected.
-Takahiro Akashi
> issue with the way the firmware is packaged by users (with U-Boot
> coming from one place and TF-A another). I think Ilias is going to
> write something up to help get to the bottom of it.
>
> >
> > > is relocated
> > > - testing becomes harder, with the suggestion of adding an entire new
> > > sandbox build just for this
> >
> > Having an extra config is not required when putting the certificate into
> > .rodata.
>
> The certificate should not go in rodata, period. Please just fix it.
> It use to be fine a few weeks ago so it should not be hard.
>
> Regards,
> Simon
>
> >
> > Best regards
> >
> > Heinrich
> >
> > >
> > > Revert this until a new direction can be established.
> > >
> > > Changes in v2:
> > > - Also revert two other patches, based on comment from Takahiro
> > >
> > > Simon Glass (3):
> > > Revert "doc: Update CapsuleUpdate READMEs"
> > > Revert "mkeficapsule: Remove dtb related options"
> > > Revert "efi_capsule: Move signature from DTB to .rodata"
> > >
> > > board/emulation/common/Makefile | 1 +
> > > board/emulation/common/qemu_capsule.c | 43 ++++
> > > doc/board/emulation/qemu_capsule_update.rst | 203 +++++++++++++++++
> > > doc/develop/uefi/uefi.rst | 125 -----------
> > > include/asm-generic/sections.h | 2 -
> > > lib/efi_loader/Kconfig | 7 -
> > > lib/efi_loader/Makefile | 8 -
> > > lib/efi_loader/efi_capsule.c | 18 +-
> > > lib/efi_loader/efi_capsule_key.S | 17 --
> > > tools/mkeficapsule.c | 229 +++++++++++++++++++-
> > > 10 files changed, 472 insertions(+), 181 deletions(-)
> > > create mode 100644 board/emulation/common/qemu_capsule.c
> > > create mode 100644 doc/board/emulation/qemu_capsule_update.rst
> > > delete mode 100644 lib/efi_loader/efi_capsule_key.S
> > >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-06 0:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-02 14:44 [PATCH v2 0/3] efi: Minimal revert to rodata change Simon Glass
2021-08-02 14:44 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] Revert "doc: Update CapsuleUpdate READMEs" Simon Glass
2021-08-02 14:44 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] Revert "mkeficapsule: Remove dtb related options" Simon Glass
2021-08-03 5:29 ` KASHI Takahiro
2021-08-04 16:08 ` Simon Glass
2021-08-02 14:44 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] Revert "efi_capsule: Move signature from DTB to .rodata" Simon Glass
2021-08-02 15:37 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] efi: Minimal revert to rodata change Ilias Apalodimas
2021-08-02 20:02 ` Simon Glass
2021-08-03 5:43 ` Ilias Apalodimas
2021-08-03 15:27 ` Simon Glass
2021-08-02 17:30 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2021-08-02 19:22 ` Simon Glass
2021-08-03 5:46 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] efi: Minimal revert to rodata change\ Ilias Apalodimas
2021-08-03 15:27 ` Simon Glass
2021-08-05 15:24 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] efi: Minimal revert to rodata change Heinrich Schuchardt
2021-08-05 15:46 ` Simon Glass
2021-08-06 0:13 ` KASHI Takahiro [this message]
2021-08-06 0:33 ` Simon Glass
2021-08-09 16:01 ` Tom Rini
2021-08-13 12:37 ` Tom Rini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210806001321.GA44938@laputa \
--to=takahiro.akashi@linaro.org \
--cc=agraf@csgraf.de \
--cc=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu@linaro.org \
--cc=sjg@chromium.org \
--cc=sughosh.ganu@linaro.org \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
--cc=xypron.glpk@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox