* [PATCH] doc: Remove obsolete README.440-DDR-performance file
@ 2021-10-19 7:25 Thomas Huth
2021-10-20 9:51 ` Stefan Roese
2021-10-20 22:32 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Huth @ 2021-10-19 7:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot; +Cc: Stefan Roese, Heiko Schocher
The PPC 440 support has been removed in commit 98f705c9ce
("powerpc: remove 4xx support") already, so this file is
certainly not required anymore.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
---
doc/README.440-DDR-performance | 90 ----------------------------------
1 file changed, 90 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 doc/README.440-DDR-performance
diff --git a/doc/README.440-DDR-performance b/doc/README.440-DDR-performance
deleted file mode 100644
index 66b97bc9b5..0000000000
--- a/doc/README.440-DDR-performance
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,90 +0,0 @@
-AMCC suggested to set the PMU bit to 0 for best performace on the
-PPC440 DDR controller. The 440er common DDR setup files (sdram.c &
-spd_sdram.c) are changed accordingly. So all 440er boards using
-these setup routines will automatically receive this performance
-increase.
-
-Please see below some benchmarks done by AMCC to demonstrate this
-performance changes:
-
-
-----------------------------------------
-SDRAM0_CFG0[PMU] = 1 (U-Boot default for Bamboo, Yosemite and Yellowstone)
-----------------------------------------
-Stream benchmark results
--------------------------------------------------------------
-This system uses 8 bytes per DOUBLE PRECISION word.
--------------------------------------------------------------
-Array size = 2000000, Offset = 0
-Total memory required = 45.8 MB.
-Each test is run 10 times, but only
-the *best* time for each is used.
--------------------------------------------------------------
-Your clock granularity/precision appears to be 1 microseconds.
-Each test below will take on the order of 112345 microseconds.
- (= 112345 clock ticks)
-Increase the size of the arrays if this shows that you are not getting
-at least 20 clock ticks per test.
--------------------------------------------------------------
-WARNING -- The above is only a rough guideline.
-For best results, please be sure you know the precision of your system
-timer.
--------------------------------------------------------------
-Function Rate (MB/s) RMS time Min time Max time
-Copy: 256.7683 0.1248 0.1246 0.1250
-Scale: 246.0157 0.1302 0.1301 0.1302
-Add: 255.0316 0.1883 0.1882 0.1885
-Triad: 253.1245 0.1897 0.1896 0.1899
-
-
-TTCP Benchmark Results
-ttcp-t: socket
-ttcp-t: connect
-ttcp-t: buflen=8192, nbuf=2048, align=16384/0, port=5000 tcp ->
-localhost
-ttcp-t: 16777216 bytes in 0.28 real seconds = 454.29 Mbit/sec +++
-ttcp-t: 2048 I/O calls, msec/call = 0.14, calls/sec = 7268.57
-ttcp-t: 0.0user 0.1sys 0:00real 60% 0i+0d 0maxrss 0+2pf 3+1506csw
-
-----------------------------------------
-SDRAM0_CFG0[PMU] = 0 (Suggested modification)
-Setting PMU = 0 provides a noticeable performance improvement *2% to
-5% improvement in memory performance.
-*Improves the Mbit/sec for TTCP benchmark by almost 76%.
-----------------------------------------
-Stream benchmark results
--------------------------------------------------------------
-This system uses 8 bytes per DOUBLE PRECISION word.
--------------------------------------------------------------
-Array size = 2000000, Offset = 0
-Total memory required = 45.8 MB.
-Each test is run 10 times, but only
-the *best* time for each is used.
--------------------------------------------------------------
-Your clock granularity/precision appears to be 1 microseconds.
-Each test below will take on the order of 120066 microseconds.
- (= 120066 clock ticks)
-Increase the size of the arrays if this shows that you are not getting
-at least 20 clock ticks per test.
--------------------------------------------------------------
-WARNING -- The above is only a rough guideline.
-For best results, please be sure you know the precision of your system
-timer.
--------------------------------------------------------------
-Function Rate (MB/s) RMS time Min time Max time
-Copy: 262.5167 0.1221 0.1219 0.1223
-Scale: 258.4856 0.1238 0.1238 0.1240
-Add: 262.5404 0.1829 0.1828 0.1831
-Triad: 266.8594 0.1800 0.1799 0.1802
-
-TTCP Benchmark Results
-ttcp-t: socket
-ttcp-t: connect
-ttcp-t: buflen=8192, nbuf=2048, align=16384/0, port=5000 tcp ->
-localhost
-ttcp-t: 16777216 bytes in 0.16 real seconds = 804.06 Mbit/sec +++
-ttcp-t: 2048 I/O calls, msec/call = 0.08, calls/sec = 12864.89
-ttcp-t: 0.0user 0.0sys 0:00real 46% 0i+0d 0maxrss 0+2pf 120+1csw
-
-
-2006-07-28, Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
--
2.27.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] doc: Remove obsolete README.440-DDR-performance file
2021-10-19 7:25 [PATCH] doc: Remove obsolete README.440-DDR-performance file Thomas Huth
@ 2021-10-20 9:51 ` Stefan Roese
2021-10-20 22:32 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Roese @ 2021-10-20 9:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Huth, u-boot; +Cc: Heiko Schocher
On 19.10.21 09:25, Thomas Huth wrote:
> The PPC 440 support has been removed in commit 98f705c9ce
> ("powerpc: remove 4xx support") already, so this file is
> certainly not required anymore.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
Thanks,
Stefan
> ---
> doc/README.440-DDR-performance | 90 ----------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 90 deletions(-)
> delete mode 100644 doc/README.440-DDR-performance
>
> diff --git a/doc/README.440-DDR-performance b/doc/README.440-DDR-performance
> deleted file mode 100644
> index 66b97bc9b5..0000000000
> --- a/doc/README.440-DDR-performance
> +++ /dev/null
> @@ -1,90 +0,0 @@
> -AMCC suggested to set the PMU bit to 0 for best performace on the
> -PPC440 DDR controller. The 440er common DDR setup files (sdram.c &
> -spd_sdram.c) are changed accordingly. So all 440er boards using
> -these setup routines will automatically receive this performance
> -increase.
> -
> -Please see below some benchmarks done by AMCC to demonstrate this
> -performance changes:
> -
> -
> -----------------------------------------
> -SDRAM0_CFG0[PMU] = 1 (U-Boot default for Bamboo, Yosemite and Yellowstone)
> -----------------------------------------
> -Stream benchmark results
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -This system uses 8 bytes per DOUBLE PRECISION word.
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -Array size = 2000000, Offset = 0
> -Total memory required = 45.8 MB.
> -Each test is run 10 times, but only
> -the *best* time for each is used.
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -Your clock granularity/precision appears to be 1 microseconds.
> -Each test below will take on the order of 112345 microseconds.
> - (= 112345 clock ticks)
> -Increase the size of the arrays if this shows that you are not getting
> -at least 20 clock ticks per test.
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -WARNING -- The above is only a rough guideline.
> -For best results, please be sure you know the precision of your system
> -timer.
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -Function Rate (MB/s) RMS time Min time Max time
> -Copy: 256.7683 0.1248 0.1246 0.1250
> -Scale: 246.0157 0.1302 0.1301 0.1302
> -Add: 255.0316 0.1883 0.1882 0.1885
> -Triad: 253.1245 0.1897 0.1896 0.1899
> -
> -
> -TTCP Benchmark Results
> -ttcp-t: socket
> -ttcp-t: connect
> -ttcp-t: buflen=8192, nbuf=2048, align=16384/0, port=5000 tcp ->
> -localhost
> -ttcp-t: 16777216 bytes in 0.28 real seconds = 454.29 Mbit/sec +++
> -ttcp-t: 2048 I/O calls, msec/call = 0.14, calls/sec = 7268.57
> -ttcp-t: 0.0user 0.1sys 0:00real 60% 0i+0d 0maxrss 0+2pf 3+1506csw
> -
> -----------------------------------------
> -SDRAM0_CFG0[PMU] = 0 (Suggested modification)
> -Setting PMU = 0 provides a noticeable performance improvement *2% to
> -5% improvement in memory performance.
> -*Improves the Mbit/sec for TTCP benchmark by almost 76%.
> -----------------------------------------
> -Stream benchmark results
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -This system uses 8 bytes per DOUBLE PRECISION word.
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -Array size = 2000000, Offset = 0
> -Total memory required = 45.8 MB.
> -Each test is run 10 times, but only
> -the *best* time for each is used.
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -Your clock granularity/precision appears to be 1 microseconds.
> -Each test below will take on the order of 120066 microseconds.
> - (= 120066 clock ticks)
> -Increase the size of the arrays if this shows that you are not getting
> -at least 20 clock ticks per test.
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -WARNING -- The above is only a rough guideline.
> -For best results, please be sure you know the precision of your system
> -timer.
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -Function Rate (MB/s) RMS time Min time Max time
> -Copy: 262.5167 0.1221 0.1219 0.1223
> -Scale: 258.4856 0.1238 0.1238 0.1240
> -Add: 262.5404 0.1829 0.1828 0.1831
> -Triad: 266.8594 0.1800 0.1799 0.1802
> -
> -TTCP Benchmark Results
> -ttcp-t: socket
> -ttcp-t: connect
> -ttcp-t: buflen=8192, nbuf=2048, align=16384/0, port=5000 tcp ->
> -localhost
> -ttcp-t: 16777216 bytes in 0.16 real seconds = 804.06 Mbit/sec +++
> -ttcp-t: 2048 I/O calls, msec/call = 0.08, calls/sec = 12864.89
> -ttcp-t: 0.0user 0.0sys 0:00real 46% 0i+0d 0maxrss 0+2pf 120+1csw
> -
> -
> -2006-07-28, Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
>
Viele Grüße,
Stefan
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-51 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: sr@denx.de
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] doc: Remove obsolete README.440-DDR-performance file
2021-10-19 7:25 [PATCH] doc: Remove obsolete README.440-DDR-performance file Thomas Huth
2021-10-20 9:51 ` Stefan Roese
@ 2021-10-20 22:32 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2021-10-21 5:16 ` Stefan Roese
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Heinrich Schuchardt @ 2021-10-20 22:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Huth; +Cc: Stefan Roese, Heiko Schocher, u-boot
On 10/19/21 9:25 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> The PPC 440 support has been removed in commit 98f705c9ce
> ("powerpc: remove 4xx support") already, so this file is
> certainly not required anymore.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
> ---
> doc/README.440-DDR-performance | 90 ----------------------------------
Shouldn't doc/README.nand-boot-ppc440 be removed too?
Best regards
Heinrich
> 1 file changed, 90 deletions(-)
> delete mode 100644 doc/README.440-DDR-performance
>
> diff --git a/doc/README.440-DDR-performance b/doc/README.440-DDR-performance
> deleted file mode 100644
> index 66b97bc9b5..0000000000
> --- a/doc/README.440-DDR-performance
> +++ /dev/null
> @@ -1,90 +0,0 @@
> -AMCC suggested to set the PMU bit to 0 for best performace on the
> -PPC440 DDR controller. The 440er common DDR setup files (sdram.c &
> -spd_sdram.c) are changed accordingly. So all 440er boards using
> -these setup routines will automatically receive this performance
> -increase.
> -
> -Please see below some benchmarks done by AMCC to demonstrate this
> -performance changes:
> -
> -
> -----------------------------------------
> -SDRAM0_CFG0[PMU] = 1 (U-Boot default for Bamboo, Yosemite and Yellowstone)
> -----------------------------------------
> -Stream benchmark results
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -This system uses 8 bytes per DOUBLE PRECISION word.
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -Array size = 2000000, Offset = 0
> -Total memory required = 45.8 MB.
> -Each test is run 10 times, but only
> -the *best* time for each is used.
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -Your clock granularity/precision appears to be 1 microseconds.
> -Each test below will take on the order of 112345 microseconds.
> - (= 112345 clock ticks)
> -Increase the size of the arrays if this shows that you are not getting
> -at least 20 clock ticks per test.
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -WARNING -- The above is only a rough guideline.
> -For best results, please be sure you know the precision of your system
> -timer.
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -Function Rate (MB/s) RMS time Min time Max time
> -Copy: 256.7683 0.1248 0.1246 0.1250
> -Scale: 246.0157 0.1302 0.1301 0.1302
> -Add: 255.0316 0.1883 0.1882 0.1885
> -Triad: 253.1245 0.1897 0.1896 0.1899
> -
> -
> -TTCP Benchmark Results
> -ttcp-t: socket
> -ttcp-t: connect
> -ttcp-t: buflen=8192, nbuf=2048, align=16384/0, port=5000 tcp ->
> -localhost
> -ttcp-t: 16777216 bytes in 0.28 real seconds = 454.29 Mbit/sec +++
> -ttcp-t: 2048 I/O calls, msec/call = 0.14, calls/sec = 7268.57
> -ttcp-t: 0.0user 0.1sys 0:00real 60% 0i+0d 0maxrss 0+2pf 3+1506csw
> -
> -----------------------------------------
> -SDRAM0_CFG0[PMU] = 0 (Suggested modification)
> -Setting PMU = 0 provides a noticeable performance improvement *2% to
> -5% improvement in memory performance.
> -*Improves the Mbit/sec for TTCP benchmark by almost 76%.
> -----------------------------------------
> -Stream benchmark results
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -This system uses 8 bytes per DOUBLE PRECISION word.
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -Array size = 2000000, Offset = 0
> -Total memory required = 45.8 MB.
> -Each test is run 10 times, but only
> -the *best* time for each is used.
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -Your clock granularity/precision appears to be 1 microseconds.
> -Each test below will take on the order of 120066 microseconds.
> - (= 120066 clock ticks)
> -Increase the size of the arrays if this shows that you are not getting
> -at least 20 clock ticks per test.
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -WARNING -- The above is only a rough guideline.
> -For best results, please be sure you know the precision of your system
> -timer.
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -Function Rate (MB/s) RMS time Min time Max time
> -Copy: 262.5167 0.1221 0.1219 0.1223
> -Scale: 258.4856 0.1238 0.1238 0.1240
> -Add: 262.5404 0.1829 0.1828 0.1831
> -Triad: 266.8594 0.1800 0.1799 0.1802
> -
> -TTCP Benchmark Results
> -ttcp-t: socket
> -ttcp-t: connect
> -ttcp-t: buflen=8192, nbuf=2048, align=16384/0, port=5000 tcp ->
> -localhost
> -ttcp-t: 16777216 bytes in 0.16 real seconds = 804.06 Mbit/sec +++
> -ttcp-t: 2048 I/O calls, msec/call = 0.08, calls/sec = 12864.89
> -ttcp-t: 0.0user 0.0sys 0:00real 46% 0i+0d 0maxrss 0+2pf 120+1csw
> -
> -
> -2006-07-28, Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] doc: Remove obsolete README.440-DDR-performance file
2021-10-20 22:32 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
@ 2021-10-21 5:16 ` Stefan Roese
2021-10-21 6:00 ` Thomas Huth
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Roese @ 2021-10-21 5:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Heinrich Schuchardt, Thomas Huth; +Cc: Heiko Schocher, u-boot
On 21.10.21 00:32, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 10/19/21 9:25 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> The PPC 440 support has been removed in commit 98f705c9ce
>> ("powerpc: remove 4xx support") already, so this file is
>> certainly not required anymore.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
>> ---
>> doc/README.440-DDR-performance | 90 ----------------------------------
>
> Shouldn't doc/README.nand-boot-ppc440 be removed too?
Yes. I'll send a patch for this soonish.
Thanks,
Stefan
> Best regards
>
> Heinrich
>
>> 1 file changed, 90 deletions(-)
>> delete mode 100644 doc/README.440-DDR-performance
>>
>> diff --git a/doc/README.440-DDR-performance
>> b/doc/README.440-DDR-performance
>> deleted file mode 100644
>> index 66b97bc9b5..0000000000
>> --- a/doc/README.440-DDR-performance
>> +++ /dev/null
>> @@ -1,90 +0,0 @@
>> -AMCC suggested to set the PMU bit to 0 for best performace on the
>> -PPC440 DDR controller. The 440er common DDR setup files (sdram.c &
>> -spd_sdram.c) are changed accordingly. So all 440er boards using
>> -these setup routines will automatically receive this performance
>> -increase.
>> -
>> -Please see below some benchmarks done by AMCC to demonstrate this
>> -performance changes:
>> -
>> -
>> -----------------------------------------
>> -SDRAM0_CFG0[PMU] = 1 (U-Boot default for Bamboo, Yosemite and
>> Yellowstone)
>> -----------------------------------------
>> -Stream benchmark results
>> --------------------------------------------------------------
>> -This system uses 8 bytes per DOUBLE PRECISION word.
>> --------------------------------------------------------------
>> -Array size = 2000000, Offset = 0
>> -Total memory required = 45.8 MB.
>> -Each test is run 10 times, but only
>> -the *best* time for each is used.
>> --------------------------------------------------------------
>> -Your clock granularity/precision appears to be 1 microseconds.
>> -Each test below will take on the order of 112345 microseconds.
>> - (= 112345 clock ticks)
>> -Increase the size of the arrays if this shows that you are not getting
>> -at least 20 clock ticks per test.
>> --------------------------------------------------------------
>> -WARNING -- The above is only a rough guideline.
>> -For best results, please be sure you know the precision of your system
>> -timer.
>> --------------------------------------------------------------
>> -Function Rate (MB/s) RMS time Min time Max time
>> -Copy: 256.7683 0.1248 0.1246 0.1250
>> -Scale: 246.0157 0.1302 0.1301 0.1302
>> -Add: 255.0316 0.1883 0.1882 0.1885
>> -Triad: 253.1245 0.1897 0.1896 0.1899
>> -
>> -
>> -TTCP Benchmark Results
>> -ttcp-t: socket
>> -ttcp-t: connect
>> -ttcp-t: buflen=8192, nbuf=2048, align=16384/0, port=5000 tcp ->
>> -localhost
>> -ttcp-t: 16777216 bytes in 0.28 real seconds = 454.29 Mbit/sec +++
>> -ttcp-t: 2048 I/O calls, msec/call = 0.14, calls/sec = 7268.57
>> -ttcp-t: 0.0user 0.1sys 0:00real 60% 0i+0d 0maxrss 0+2pf 3+1506csw
>> -
>> -----------------------------------------
>> -SDRAM0_CFG0[PMU] = 0 (Suggested modification)
>> -Setting PMU = 0 provides a noticeable performance improvement *2% to
>> -5% improvement in memory performance.
>> -*Improves the Mbit/sec for TTCP benchmark by almost 76%.
>> -----------------------------------------
>> -Stream benchmark results
>> --------------------------------------------------------------
>> -This system uses 8 bytes per DOUBLE PRECISION word.
>> --------------------------------------------------------------
>> -Array size = 2000000, Offset = 0
>> -Total memory required = 45.8 MB.
>> -Each test is run 10 times, but only
>> -the *best* time for each is used.
>> --------------------------------------------------------------
>> -Your clock granularity/precision appears to be 1 microseconds.
>> -Each test below will take on the order of 120066 microseconds.
>> - (= 120066 clock ticks)
>> -Increase the size of the arrays if this shows that you are not getting
>> -at least 20 clock ticks per test.
>> --------------------------------------------------------------
>> -WARNING -- The above is only a rough guideline.
>> -For best results, please be sure you know the precision of your system
>> -timer.
>> --------------------------------------------------------------
>> -Function Rate (MB/s) RMS time Min time Max time
>> -Copy: 262.5167 0.1221 0.1219 0.1223
>> -Scale: 258.4856 0.1238 0.1238 0.1240
>> -Add: 262.5404 0.1829 0.1828 0.1831
>> -Triad: 266.8594 0.1800 0.1799 0.1802
>> -
>> -TTCP Benchmark Results
>> -ttcp-t: socket
>> -ttcp-t: connect
>> -ttcp-t: buflen=8192, nbuf=2048, align=16384/0, port=5000 tcp ->
>> -localhost
>> -ttcp-t: 16777216 bytes in 0.16 real seconds = 804.06 Mbit/sec +++
>> -ttcp-t: 2048 I/O calls, msec/call = 0.08, calls/sec = 12864.89
>> -ttcp-t: 0.0user 0.0sys 0:00real 46% 0i+0d 0maxrss 0+2pf 120+1csw
>> -
>> -
>> -2006-07-28, Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
>>
>
Viele Grüße,
Stefan
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-51 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: sr@denx.de
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] doc: Remove obsolete README.440-DDR-performance file
2021-10-21 5:16 ` Stefan Roese
@ 2021-10-21 6:00 ` Thomas Huth
2021-10-21 6:11 ` Thomas Huth
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Huth @ 2021-10-21 6:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefan Roese, Heinrich Schuchardt; +Cc: Heiko Schocher, u-boot
On 21/10/2021 07.16, Stefan Roese wrote:
> On 21.10.21 00:32, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>> On 10/19/21 9:25 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>> The PPC 440 support has been removed in commit 98f705c9ce
>>> ("powerpc: remove 4xx support") already, so this file is
>>> certainly not required anymore.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
>>> ---
>>> doc/README.440-DDR-performance | 90 ----------------------------------
>>
>> Shouldn't doc/README.nand-boot-ppc440 be removed too?
>
> Yes. I'll send a patch for this soonish.
... and doc/README.ppc440, too? And what about doc/README.bedbug, it still
mentions ppc405 stuff ... is bedbug still used?
I think you could also add doc/README.mpc74xx, the 74xx support has been
removed in commit d928664f4101e24.
Thomas
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] doc: Remove obsolete README.440-DDR-performance file
2021-10-21 6:00 ` Thomas Huth
@ 2021-10-21 6:11 ` Thomas Huth
2021-10-21 6:31 ` Stefan Roese
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Huth @ 2021-10-21 6:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefan Roese, Heinrich Schuchardt; +Cc: Heiko Schocher, u-boot
On 21/10/2021 08.00, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 21/10/2021 07.16, Stefan Roese wrote:
>> On 21.10.21 00:32, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>>> On 10/19/21 9:25 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>>> The PPC 440 support has been removed in commit 98f705c9ce
>>>> ("powerpc: remove 4xx support") already, so this file is
>>>> certainly not required anymore.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
>>>> ---
>>>> doc/README.440-DDR-performance | 90 ----------------------------------
>>>
>>> Shouldn't doc/README.nand-boot-ppc440 be removed too?
>>
>> Yes. I'll send a patch for this soonish.
>
> ... and doc/README.ppc440, too? And what about doc/README.bedbug, it still
> mentions ppc405 stuff ... is bedbug still used?
Ah, never mind my comment about README.ppc440, I just noticed that I had
checked out an older branch and that this file is already gone.
Thomas
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] doc: Remove obsolete README.440-DDR-performance file
2021-10-21 6:11 ` Thomas Huth
@ 2021-10-21 6:31 ` Stefan Roese
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Roese @ 2021-10-21 6:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Huth, Heinrich Schuchardt; +Cc: Heiko Schocher, u-boot
On 21.10.21 08:11, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 21/10/2021 08.00, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> On 21/10/2021 07.16, Stefan Roese wrote:
>>> On 21.10.21 00:32, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>>>> On 10/19/21 9:25 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>>>> The PPC 440 support has been removed in commit 98f705c9ce
>>>>> ("powerpc: remove 4xx support") already, so this file is
>>>>> certainly not required anymore.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> doc/README.440-DDR-performance | 90
>>>>> ----------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> Shouldn't doc/README.nand-boot-ppc440 be removed too?
>>>
>>> Yes. I'll send a patch for this soonish.
>>
>> ... and doc/README.ppc440, too? And what about doc/README.bedbug, it
>> still mentions ppc405 stuff ... is bedbug still used?
>
> Ah, never mind my comment about README.ppc440, I just noticed that I had
> checked out an older branch and that this file is already gone.
Yes, I checked and couldn't find this file any more.
Regarding bedbug. It also references PPC860, so we should not remove
it now IMHO.
Thanks,
Stefan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-10-21 12:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-10-19 7:25 [PATCH] doc: Remove obsolete README.440-DDR-performance file Thomas Huth
2021-10-20 9:51 ` Stefan Roese
2021-10-20 22:32 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2021-10-21 5:16 ` Stefan Roese
2021-10-21 6:00 ` Thomas Huth
2021-10-21 6:11 ` Thomas Huth
2021-10-21 6:31 ` Stefan Roese
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox