public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu@linaro.org>
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de,
	Patrick Delaunay <patrick.delaunay@foss.st.com>,
	Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@foss.st.com>,
	Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>,
	Alexander Graf <agraf@csgraf.de>, Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>,
	Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>,
	Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>,
	Jose Marinho <jose.marinho@arm.com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@arm.com>,
	Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>,
	Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@linaro.org>,
	Sughosh Ganu <sughosh.ganu@linaro.org>,
	Paul Liu <paul.liu@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] EFI: Support CAPSULE_FLAGS_INITIATE_RESET for capsule update
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2022 16:20:27 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220126072027.GA56161@laputa> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93ih3HR+4eCcjzpdvpEo9DhATbyrwx3btsoffhzxAOQVCDCw@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 11:29:10AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> BTW, the original code comes from EDK2 implementation.

What do you mean by "original code"?

> It seems that this INITIATE_RESET flag meaning in EDK2 is a bit different
> from what we thought here.

Yeah,

> The flag is only used for resetting system via
> UpdateCapsule() EFI call. The capsule update process itself will be done
> at the boot time and warm reset soon after that.

EDK2's UpdateCapsule() seems to
- immediately process *all* the capsules with !PERSIST_ACROSS_RESET
- Set "CapsuleUpdateData" variable with a physical address of capsule data
- If some of capsules have INITIATE_RESET, kick in warm restart
After restart,
- process the rest of capsules with PERSIST_ACROSS_RESET
  using "CapsuleUpdateData" (?)

> (See HandleCapsules()@ArmPkg/Library/PlatformBootManagerLib/PlatformBm.c)
> 
> Is it OK to change the INITIATE_RESET flag means? or should we forcibly
> reset the system if we succeeded to update capsule on boot time?
> (note that capsule on disk must be done at boot time in U-Boot)

Obviously, we are trying to use the flag in a different way;
initiating a reset *after* processing a capsule.

While I think that the text in the specification is still ambiguous,
we should not give the flag a different meaning.

In 8.5.5 "Delivery of Capsules via file on Mass Storage device",
    In all cases that a capsule is identified for processing the system is
    restarted after capsule processing is completed.

So a reset in case of capsule-on-disk seems mandatory.
(Personally, I don't like the system to enforce a reset.)

The discussion above also indicates that the current efi_launch_capsules()
must be reworked so not to use efi_update_capsule() which is to honor
the flags in a capsule header.

-Takahiro Akashi

> Thank you,
> 
> 2022年1月26日(水) 7:31 Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu@linaro.org>:
> >
> > Hi Takahiro,
> >
> > 2022年1月25日(火) 21:49 AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>:
> > >
> > > Hi Masami,
> > >
> > > Thank you for this enhancement.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 08:31:29PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > > > Support CAPSULE_FLAGS_INITIATE_RESET for rebooting uboot soon after
> > > > updating firmware. Note that the machine will reboot soon after
> > > > applying the capsule file which has CAPSULE_FLAGS_INITIATE_RESET
> > > > flag. If there are multiple capsules and one has this flag, the
> > > > machine may reboot while scanning the capsule files.
> > > > You can control when the machine reboot by renaming the capsule
> > > > file because the capsule files will be applied alphabetically.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu@linaro.org>
> > > > ---
> > > >  lib/efi_loader/efi_capsule.c |   13 +++++++++++++
> > > >  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/efi_capsule.c b/lib/efi_loader/efi_capsule.c
> > > > index 4463ae00fd..24a2a026a9 100644
> > > > --- a/lib/efi_loader/efi_capsule.c
> > > > +++ b/lib/efi_loader/efi_capsule.c
> > > > @@ -407,12 +407,20 @@ static efi_status_t efi_capsule_update_firmware(
> > > >       struct efi_firmware_management_protocol *fmp;
> > > >       u16 *abort_reason;
> > > >       efi_status_t ret = EFI_SUCCESS;
> > > > +     bool reset = false;
> > > >
> > > >       /* sanity check */
> > > >       if (capsule_data->header_size < sizeof(*capsule) ||
> > > >           capsule_data->header_size >= capsule_data->capsule_image_size)
> > > >               return EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER;
> > > >
> > > > +     if (capsule_data->flags & CAPSULE_FLAGS_INITIATE_RESET) {
> > > > +             /* INITIATE_RESET flag requires PERSIST_ACROSS_RESET flag */
> > > > +             if (!(capsule_data->flags & CAPSULE_FLAGS_PERSIST_ACROSS_RESET))
> > > > +                     return EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER;
> > > > +             reset = true;
> > > > +     }
> > > > +
> > > >       capsule = (void *)capsule_data + capsule_data->header_size;
> > > >       capsule_size = capsule_data->capsule_image_size
> > > >                       - capsule_data->header_size;
> > > > @@ -498,6 +506,11 @@ static efi_status_t efi_capsule_update_firmware(
> > > >  out:
> > > >       efi_free_pool(handles);
> > > >
> > > > +     if (ret == EFI_SUCCESS && reset) {
> > > > +             log_debug("This capsule has CAPSULE_FLAGS_INITIATE_RESET. Reboot machine.\n");
> > > > +             do_reset(NULL, 0, 0, NULL);
> > >
> > > I don't think this is the right place of calling do_reset().
> > > Whenever you have processed any capsule file, you have to
> > >  - delete the capsule file,
> > >  - create/update "CapsuleXXXX" and "CapsuleLast" variables, and
> > >  - modify ESRT table
> > > before initiating a reset.
> >
> > Oops, indeed. Let me update the patch.
> > Thank you!
> >
> > >
> > > -Takahiro Akashi
> > >
> > > > +     }
> > > > +
> > > >       return ret;
> > > >  }
> > > >  #else
> > > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Masami Hiramatsu
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Masami Hiramatsu

  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-26  7:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-25 11:31 [PATCH 0/2] EFI: Add CAPSULE_FLAG_INITIATE_RESET support Masami Hiramatsu
2022-01-25 11:31 ` [PATCH 1/2] EFI: Support CAPSULE_FLAGS_INITIATE_RESET for capsule update Masami Hiramatsu
2022-01-25 12:49   ` AKASHI Takahiro
2022-01-25 22:31     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2022-01-26  2:29       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2022-01-26  7:20         ` AKASHI Takahiro [this message]
2022-01-26  8:46           ` Masami Hiramatsu
2022-01-25 11:31 ` [PATCH 2/2] mkeficapsule: Support "--flags reset" option Masami Hiramatsu
2022-02-05  6:47   ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2022-02-06 23:57     ` Masami Hiramatsu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220126072027.GA56161@laputa \
    --to=takahiro.akashi@linaro.org \
    --cc=agraf@csgraf.de \
    --cc=bmeng.cn@gmail.com \
    --cc=etienne.carriere@linaro.org \
    --cc=grant.likely@arm.com \
    --cc=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \
    --cc=jose.marinho@arm.com \
    --cc=masami.hiramatsu@linaro.org \
    --cc=patrice.chotard@foss.st.com \
    --cc=patrick.delaunay@foss.st.com \
    --cc=paul.liu@linaro.org \
    --cc=sjg@chromium.org \
    --cc=sughosh.ganu@linaro.org \
    --cc=trini@konsulko.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    --cc=xypron.glpk@gmx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox