Re: [RFC PATCH v2 00/21] Modernize U-Boot shell

[Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1673 bytes --]

On Sun, Feb 06, 2022 at 07:54:26PM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 2/6/22 19:36, Francis Laniel wrote:
> > Hi.
> > 
> > First I hope you are fine and the same for your relatives.
> > 
> > During 2021 summer, Sean Anderson wrote a contribution to add a new shell, based
> > on LIL, to U-Boot [1][2].
> > While one of the goals of this contribution was to address the fact actual
> > U-Boot shell, which is based on Busybox hush, is old there was a discussion
> > about adding a new shell versus updating the actual one [3][4].
> > 
> > So, in this series, with Harald Seiler, we updated the actual U-Boot shell to
> > reflect what is currently in Busybox source code.
> > Basically, this contribution is about taking a snapshot of Busybox shell/hush.c
> > file (as it exists in commit 37460f5da) and adapt it to suit U-Boot needs.
> > 
> > This contribution was written to be as backward-compatible as possible to avoid
> > breaking the existing.
> > So, the 2021 hush flavor offers the same as the actual, that is to say:
> > 1. Variable expansion.
> > 2. Instruction lists (;, && and ||).
> > 3. If, then and else.
> > 4. Loops (for, while and until).
> > No new features offered by Busybox hush were implemented (e.g. functions).
> 
> If no new features are added relative to what we have, why should we add
> 12000 lines of code? Please, describe the benefit of the series.

Please see the referenced threads for a longer discussion of why this is
being looked at.

> Is there a repo with your patches?

Note that "b4 am -o - 20220206183717.57446-1-francis.laniel@amarulasolutions.com | git am -3"
applies cleanly.

-- 
Tom

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 659 bytes --]