From: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
To: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
Cc: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>, u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] drivers: add memory disk support
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2022 18:59:41 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220419225941.GW3045430@bill-the-cat> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <14f67fd8-623a-2054-e995-73d54898b886@canonical.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1956 bytes --]
On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 11:55:00PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 4/19/22 23:26, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 11:16:41PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> >
> > > In some scenarios it is desirable to package U-Boot with other files into
> > > a single blob. This patch allows to embed a memory disk into the U-Boot
> > > binary. This memory disk can be accessed like any other block
> > > device as 'mem 0'.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
> >
> > What's the use case for this, which isn't covered by some combination of
> > U-Boot being in a FIT image and the "load a firmware blob" that we have
> > today? Thanks!
>
> "U-Boot being in a FIT image" requires a loader that understands FIT.
Fortunately, that's U-Boot.
> "load a firmware blob" requires a block device or a network file system.
No, we have various cases where we bundle inside of the image various
black boxes, in various ways.
> If you put U-Boot's payload into the U-Boot blob, you need neither a
> separate block device nor a network file system.
What is the use case for this?
> Packaging into U-Boot makes most sense where follow-up binaries are tightly
> integrated:
[re-ordering this list, sorry]
> * delivering device-trees
Yes, we can do that today, select the right one at run time, and even
pass that along to EFI via the appropriate config table entry.
> * adding iPXE
Rather than fetching this from the network, to continue to fetch and
load applications from the network?
> * adding a custom graphical boot manager as EFI application
Why can't this be loaded from the disk?
What I would like to see is the proof of concept / design that makes use
of this, that can't make use of the existing facilities we have for
doing similar concepts already. Or that aren't something that should be
done within U-Boot, if necessary.
--
Tom
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 659 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-19 22:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-19 21:16 [PATCH 1/1] drivers: add memory disk support Heinrich Schuchardt
2022-04-19 21:26 ` Tom Rini
2022-04-19 21:55 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2022-04-19 22:20 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2022-04-19 23:01 ` Tom Rini
2022-04-20 6:48 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2022-04-20 13:37 ` Tom Rini
2022-04-19 22:59 ` Tom Rini [this message]
2022-04-20 6:58 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2022-04-20 13:45 ` Tom Rini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220419225941.GW3045430@bill-the-cat \
--to=trini@konsulko.com \
--cc=heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com \
--cc=sjg@chromium.org \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox