From: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
To: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de, trini@konsulko.com, sjg@chromium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] efi_loader: PARTITION_UUIDS should be optional
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2022 09:57:50 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220421004011.GB7584@laputa> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e526c8ca-43c6-dc4c-2cd6-24112adfb4ed@gmx.de>
On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 09:37:39AM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 4/19/22 03:01, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> > In the current implementation, partition table support (either GPT or DOS)
> > is not mandatory. So CONFIG_PARTITION_UUIDS should not be enabled
> > (selected) unconditionally.
> >
> > Fixes: commit 17f8cda505e3 ("efi_loader: set partition GUID in device path for SIG_TYPE_GUID")
> > Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > lib/efi_loader/Kconfig | 2 +-
> > lib/efi_loader/efi_device_path.c | 11 ++++++++++-
> > 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/Kconfig b/lib/efi_loader/Kconfig
> > index d50cd2563d3d..bc518d7a413b 100644
> > --- a/lib/efi_loader/Kconfig
> > +++ b/lib/efi_loader/Kconfig
> > @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ config EFI_LOADER
> > depends on !EFI_APP
> > default y if !ARM || SYS_CPU = armv7 || SYS_CPU = armv8
> > select LIB_UUID
> > - select PARTITION_UUIDS
> > + imply PARTITION_UUIDS
> > select HAVE_BLOCK_DEVICE
> > select REGEX
> > imply FAT
> > diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/efi_device_path.c b/lib/efi_loader/efi_device_path.c
> > index 0542aaae16c7..01fb53ae8c40 100644
> > --- a/lib/efi_loader/efi_device_path.c
> > +++ b/lib/efi_loader/efi_device_path.c
> > @@ -864,11 +864,20 @@ static void *dp_part_node(void *buf, struct blk_desc *desc, int part)
> > break;
> > case SIG_TYPE_GUID:
>
> This can only be reached for CONFIG_EFI_PARTITION=y.
I know, but the code won't be exercised anyway if !CONFIG_EFI_PARTITION.
> > hddp->signature_type = 2;
> > +#if CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(PARTITION_UUIDS)
> > + /* info.uuid exists only with PARTITION_UUIDS */
> > if (uuid_str_to_bin(info.uuid,
> > - hddp->partition_signature, 1))
> > + hddp->partition_signature, 1)) {
>
> uuid_guid_get_bin() does not write any byte if info.uuid is not valid.
What matters here is that "uuid" in struct disk_partition is defined
only if CONFIG_PARTITION_UUIDS.
> > log_warning(
> > "Partition no. %d: invalid guid: %s\n",
> > part, info.uuid);
>
> > + memset(hddp->partition_signature, 0,
> > + sizeof(hddp->partition_signature));
>
> dp_alloc() already has zeroed out the memory. Please, remove the
> superfluous code.
>
> > + }
> > +#else
> > + memset(hddp->partition_signature, 0,
> > + sizeof(hddp->partition_signature));
>
> ditto.
>
>
> This does not conform to the UEFI specification. Why should we support it?
As I said in my previous comment at patch#6,
CONFIG_EFI_PARTITION can be seen optional under the current implementation.
>
> Shouldn't we select CONFIG_PARTITION_UUIDS if CONFIG_EFI_LOADER=y and
> CONFIG_EFI_PARTITION=y.
Unfortunately some platforms enable (in other words, "select") PARTITION_UUIDS
unconditionally even without explicitly enabling EFI_LOADER or EFI_PARTITION.
-Takahiro Akashi
> Best regards
>
> Heinrich
>
> > +#endif
> > break;
> > }
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-21 0:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-19 1:01 [PATCH 0/7] disk: don't compile in partition support for spl/tpl if not really necessary AKASHI Takahiro
2022-04-19 1:01 ` [PATCH 1/7] disk: include errno.h explicitly in part.h AKASHI Takahiro
2022-04-19 1:01 ` [PATCH 2/7] disk: enable function prototypes in part.h for SPL/TPL AKASHI Takahiro
2022-04-19 1:01 ` [PATCH 3/7] disk: define nullified functions for !PARTITIONS AKASHI Takahiro
2022-04-19 3:09 ` Tom Rini
2022-04-19 4:11 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2022-04-19 12:12 ` Tom Rini
2022-04-20 2:17 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2022-04-20 2:50 ` Tom Rini
2022-04-19 1:01 ` [PATCH 4/7] sandbox: move a function prototype AKASHI Takahiro
2022-04-19 1:01 ` [PATCH 5/7] efi_loader: PARTITION_UUIDS should be optional AKASHI Takahiro
2022-04-20 7:37 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2022-04-21 0:57 ` AKASHI Takahiro [this message]
2022-04-21 13:13 ` Tom Rini
2022-04-19 1:01 ` [PATCH 6/7] efi_loader: disk: compile efi_disk when CONFIG_BLK AKASHI Takahiro
2022-04-20 7:42 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2022-04-21 0:30 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2022-04-23 20:08 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2022-04-19 1:01 ` [PATCH 7/7] disk: don't compile in partition support for spl/tpl if not really necessary AKASHI Takahiro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220421004011.GB7584@laputa \
--to=takahiro.akashi@linaro.org \
--cc=sjg@chromium.org \
--cc=trini@konsulko.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
--cc=xypron.glpk@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox