From: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
To: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Cc: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>,
mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl, u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] efi_loader: disk: allow blk devices even without UCLASS_PARTITION
Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 14:11:02 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220519051102.GB48050@laputa> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220509053310.GC34398@laputa>
Hi Simon,
On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 02:33:10PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> Simon,
>
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 12:43:03PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> > On 4/28/22 06:49, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> > > While GPT partition is mandated in UEFI specification, CONFIG_PARTITION is
> > > seen optional under the current implementation.
> > > So modify efi_disk_rw_blocks() to allow accepting UCLASS_BLK devices.
> > >
> > > Fixes: commit d97e98c887ed ("efi_loader: disk: use udevice instead of blk_desc")
> > > Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
> > > ---
> > > lib/efi_loader/efi_disk.c | 29 +++++++++++++++--------------
> > > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/efi_disk.c b/lib/efi_loader/efi_disk.c
> > > index 8fb5b2363c45..f5b462fb164a 100644
> > > --- a/lib/efi_loader/efi_disk.c
> > > +++ b/lib/efi_loader/efi_disk.c
> > > @@ -99,21 +99,22 @@ static efi_status_t efi_disk_rw_blocks(struct efi_block_io *this,
> > > if (buffer_size & (blksz - 1))
> > > return EFI_BAD_BUFFER_SIZE;
> > >
> > > -#if CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(PARTITIONS)
> > > - if (direction == EFI_DISK_READ)
> > > - n = dev_read(diskobj->dev, lba, blocks, buffer);
> > > - else
> > > - n = dev_write(diskobj->dev, lba, blocks, buffer);
> > > -#else
> > > - /* dev is always a block device (UCLASS_BLK) */
> > > - struct blk_desc *desc;
> > > + if (CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(PARTITIONS) &&
> > > + device_get_uclass_id(diskobj->dev) == UCLASS_PARTITION) {
> > > + if (direction == EFI_DISK_READ)
> > > + n = dev_read(diskobj->dev, lba, blocks, buffer);
> > > + else
> > > + n = dev_write(diskobj->dev, lba, blocks, buffer);
> >
> > Thanks for the patch. It solves the problem with the block IO protocol.
> >
> > Why should dev_read() and dev_write only work for UCLASS_PARTITION?
>
> I don't remember well, but I have expected that even a whole disk be
> represented as a partition (0).
>
> > Can't we make it work for any block device? I think the treatment of
> > different types of block devices should be moved to disk/disk-uclass.c.
>
> @Simon, what are your thoughts?
Gentle ping. Any comment here?
-Takahiro Akashi
>
> -Takahiro Akashi
>
> > I will pull this patch as a fast fix. But this should not be the final
> > design.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
> >
> > > + } else {
> > > + /* dev is a block device (UCLASS_BLK) */
> > > + struct blk_desc *desc;
> > >
> > > - desc = dev_get_uclass_plat(diskobj->dev);
> > > - if (direction == EFI_DISK_READ)
> > > - n = blk_dread(desc, lba, blocks, buffer);
> > > - else
> > > - n = blk_dwrite(desc, lba, blocks, buffer);
> > > -#endif
> > > + desc = dev_get_uclass_plat(diskobj->dev);
> > > + if (direction == EFI_DISK_READ)
> > > + n = blk_dread(desc, lba, blocks, buffer);
> > > + else
> > > + n = blk_dwrite(desc, lba, blocks, buffer);
> > > + }
> > >
> > > /* We don't do interrupts, so check for timers cooperatively */
> > > efi_timer_check();
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-19 5:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-28 4:49 [PATCH] efi_loader: disk: allow blk devices even without UCLASS_PARTITION AKASHI Takahiro
2022-04-28 10:43 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2022-05-09 5:33 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2022-05-19 5:11 ` AKASHI Takahiro [this message]
2022-06-01 0:29 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2022-04-28 20:08 ` Mark Kettenis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220519051102.GB48050@laputa \
--to=takahiro.akashi@linaro.org \
--cc=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
--cc=sjg@chromium.org \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
--cc=xypron.glpk@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox