From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from phobos.denx.de (phobos.denx.de [85.214.62.61]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F03CDC433EF for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 22:36:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from h2850616.stratoserver.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by phobos.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0017844C1; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 00:33:59 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=amarulasolutions.com Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=amarulasolutions.com header.i=@amarulasolutions.com header.b="acH+pPKw"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by phobos.denx.de (Postfix, from userid 109) id 4D13784480; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 00:33:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-wr1-x431.google.com (mail-wr1-x431.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::431]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by phobos.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 201B984424 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 00:33:13 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=amarulasolutions.com Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=francis.laniel@amarulasolutions.com Received: by mail-wr1-x431.google.com with SMTP id v14so3552279wra.5 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 15:33:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=amarulasolutions.com; s=google; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Z1wBavgM424vQ5qyxj3jcHz+6n5FrbBiBv9+5qG/KiY=; b=acH+pPKwdoeCG6BPbaWmDQaT1FnioieiLW4rO5Pbcj2iED9kxoPbEGJ+MbwCgLA4cr 1r85iXq0GeqBLyd+7ZKXOkOcBIsgLtiYAhvcCY72UeqhPIOSqVeOkJEI2VFUQPJofltD GxGDiH78g9CZF4ADzABa9x4bz4+nNTVa3CNLM= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Z1wBavgM424vQ5qyxj3jcHz+6n5FrbBiBv9+5qG/KiY=; b=zh8Rn9v3k1nmxpDTQQVy9gGt3fiRm+3VQP/Egz5/HYbt1bYzlZPiuMGkHIcqh8OfMT IsSGsvIkJEAP2VB1KX2d/XP/c0fQgr8lrPZBmPnLaoimHMOyHYcU9XnxHzQeWpoGYROH vc2pKIkp/mIc1d6Et1e9fkv38XuqMjg8vlofnguRbiTuzkpGVYNE0obNNAhymOo7Ll82 PhznCb4H0aIe3OZjyCUaEZl/a4dTTbvQv/XdkJJ77N5dSYOvd01tGpEhAkNcENybzyxv DP8DjlRIoLX8Qyt8ZdvglvGbULA0il1+vg8lCo0zR3UoYWyl5OpaaRBkkyfkdYGixi8u EUxQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora+haY0/kp493+XRcodlzou85Fq6mgOUSEaKSCeWElSlaFRKp+hQ cf5Hu/zXsDvhvbLeBKNf1b5WgnPojnKdww== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1sknf50/t7g7upKT2fqI7SYhUyI2aL1bl01HhKG25IuxwopP/nIMgbrVm+qzwVCsG9dOjjMcw== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:64ac:0:b0:211:7f3b:8151 with SMTP id m12-20020a5d64ac000000b002117f3b8151mr6242617wrp.166.1655418792781; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 15:33:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pwmachine.home (17.pool80-103-97.dynamic.orange.es. [80.103.97.17]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n4-20020a05600c4f8400b003971fc23185sm7912044wmq.20.2022.06.16.15.33.11 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 16 Jun 2022 15:33:12 -0700 (PDT) From: Francis Laniel To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Cc: Marek Behun , Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi , Simon Glass , Wolfgang Denk , Harald Seiler , Tom Rini , Francis Laniel Subject: [RFC PATCH v4 17/28] test: hush: Fix instructions list tests for hush 2021 Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2022 00:31:47 +0200 Message-Id: <20220616223158.9225-18-francis.laniel@amarulasolutions.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20220616223158.9225-1-francis.laniel@amarulasolutions.com> References: <20220616223158.9225-1-francis.laniel@amarulasolutions.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: u-boot@lists.denx.de X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39 Precedence: list List-Id: U-Boot discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de Sender: "U-Boot" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.5 at phobos.denx.de X-Virus-Status: Clean Modifies the expected result for hush 2021. Indeed, there were bugs in actual U-Boot hush which were fixed in upstream Busybox. As hush 2021 is based on upstream Busybox, these bugs no longer exist. Signed-off-by: Francis Laniel --- test/hush/list.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/test/hush/list.c b/test/hush/list.c index 052cf2783c..6f8f10f15e 100644 --- a/test/hush/list.c +++ b/test/hush/list.c @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include static int hush_test_semicolon(struct unit_test_state *uts) { @@ -46,12 +47,43 @@ static int hush_test_or(struct unit_test_state *uts) } HUSH_TEST(hush_test_or, 0); +DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR; + static int hush_test_and_or(struct unit_test_state *uts) { /* A && B || C truth table. */ ut_asserteq(1, run_command("false && false || false", 0)); - ut_asserteq(1, run_command("false && false || true", 0)); - ut_asserteq(1, run_command("false && true || true", 0)); + + if (gd->flags & GD_FLG_HUSH_OLD_PARSER) { + ut_asserteq(1, run_command("false && false || true", 0)); + } else if (gd->flags & GD_FLG_HUSH_2021_PARSER) { + /* + * This difference seems to come from a bug solved in Busybox + * hush. + * + * Indeed, the following expression can be seen like this: + * (false && false) || true + * So, (false && false) returns 1, the second false is not + * executed, and true is executed because of ||. + */ + ut_assertok(run_command("false && false || true", 0)); + } + + if (gd->flags & GD_FLG_HUSH_OLD_PARSER) { + ut_asserteq(1, run_command("false && true || true", 0)); + } else if (gd->flags & GD_FLG_HUSH_2021_PARSER) { + /* + * This difference seems to come from a bug solved in Busybox + * hush. + * + * Indeed, the following expression can be seen like this: + * (false && true) || true + * So, (false && true) returns 1, the true is not executed, and + * true is executed because of ||. + */ + ut_assertok(run_command("false && true || true", 0)); + } + ut_asserteq(1, run_command("false && true || false", 0)); ut_assertok(run_command("true && true || false", 0)); ut_asserteq(1, run_command("true && false || false", 0)); @@ -69,8 +101,37 @@ static int hush_test_or_and(struct unit_test_state *uts) ut_asserteq(1, run_command("false || false && true", 0)); ut_assertok(run_command("false || true && true", 0)); ut_asserteq(1, run_command("false || true && false", 0)); - ut_assertok(run_command("true || true && false", 0)); - ut_assertok(run_command("true || false && false", 0)); + + if (gd->flags & GD_FLG_HUSH_OLD_PARSER) { + ut_assertok(run_command("true || true && false", 0)); + } else if (gd->flags & GD_FLG_HUSH_2021_PARSER) { + /* + * This difference seems to come from a bug solved in Busybox + * hush. + * + * Indeed, the following expression can be seen like this: + * (true || true) && false + * So, (true || true) returns 0, the second true is not + * executed, and then false is executed because of &&. + */ + ut_asserteq(1, run_command("true || true && false", 0)); + } + + if (gd->flags & GD_FLG_HUSH_OLD_PARSER) { + ut_assertok(run_command("true || false && false", 0)); + } else if (gd->flags & GD_FLG_HUSH_2021_PARSER) { + /* + * This difference seems to come from a bug solved in Busybox + * hush. + * + * Indeed, the following expression can be seen like this: + * (true || false) && false + * So, (true || false) returns 0, the false is not executed, and + * then false is executed because of &&. + */ + ut_asserteq(1, run_command("true || false && false", 0)); + } + ut_assertok(run_command("true || false && true", 0)); ut_assertok(run_command("true || true && true", 0)); -- 2.25.1