Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] test: add test for full FAT16 directory

AKASHI Takahiro
2022-08-02T00:20:09Z

On Mon, Aug 01, 2022 at 08:14:15AM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>
>
> On 8/1/22 03:50, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 31, 2022 at 01:58:37PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> > > Add a unit test checking that a full FAT16 directory leads to an error
> > > when trying to add an additional entry.
> >
> > Thank you for adding this test case, but
> > why do you restrict this test to fat16 and the root directory?
> > The root directory on fat16 is a very much special case and differently
> > implemented from others. So the test scenario doesn't do what we expect
> > for fulfilling the whole disk.
> >
> > I think we should use other sub directories (and other file systems as well).
>
> No other filesystem but FAT supports mkdir in U-Boot currently.

Right, but it won't prevent us from creating a generic test scenario.
My pytest already has a mechanism to run a test for a specific set of
file systems. See supported_fs_xxx.

> Creating the maximum 512 directory entries for the root directory of FAT16
> can be done in a reasonable time.

As I said, the root directory on fat16 is very special and has a fixed size
of blocks and using it in your test will *never* make the file system full.

> Otherwise "The maximum valid directory size is 2**21 bytes." Creating 65536
> entries takes far too long to be done in a regular test. Even a bash script
> in Linux needs more than half an hour for this on my laptop.

Providing a test and running it is different things.
If necessary, we should exercise it.

> The 2 MiB limit is not implemented in U-Boot. So the test would fail after a
> few days or weeks.

If so, why not fix the problem?

-Takahiro Akashi

>
> >
> > > Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
> > > ---
> > > v2:
> > > new patch
> > > ---
> > > test/py/tests/test_fs/test_mkdir.py | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/test/py/tests/test_fs/test_mkdir.py b/test/py/tests/test_fs/test_mkdir.py
> > > index f5cc308362..e3a9e3ed27 100644
> > > --- a/test/py/tests/test_fs/test_mkdir.py
> > > +++ b/test/py/tests/test_fs/test_mkdir.py
> > > @@ -119,3 +119,20 @@ class TestMkdir(object):
> > > assert('0123456789abcdef00/' in output)
> > > assert('0123456789abcdef13/' in output)
> > > assert_fs_integrity(fs_ubtype, fs_img)
> > > +
> > > + def test_mkdir7(self, u_boot_console, fs_obj_mkdir):
> > > + """ Test Case 7 - max out number of root directory entries
> > > + """
> > > + _, _, fs_type = fs_obj_mkdir
> >
> > Why not use fs_ubtype, _, fs_type = ..., then
> >
> > > + if fs_type != 'fat16':
> > > + return
> > > + with u_boot_console.log.section('Test Case 7 - mkdir (max out)'):
> > > + for i in range(0, 512):
> > > + output = u_boot_console.run_command(
> > > + f'fatmkdir host 0:0 /U-Boot-mkdir-max-out-test-directory-{i:05d}')
> >
> > '%smkdir ...'.format(fs_ubtype, i)
>
> We know it is FAT.
>
> Best regards
>
> Heinrich
> >
> > -Takahiro Akashi
> >
> > > + if 'Can\'t create directory entry' in output:
> > > + break
> > > + # A directory was created
> > > + assert i > 0
> > > + # The FAT16 root directory has only 512 directory entries
> > > + assert i <= 512 / 5
> > > --
> > > 2.36.1
> > >