public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
To: "Pali Rohár" <pali@kernel.org>
Cc: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>, u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: Re: Broken watchdog in u-boot master branch
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2022 13:56:10 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221010175610.GQ2020586@bill-the-cat> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221010174405.5rvz7aclukn567gj@pali>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2700 bytes --]

On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 07:44:05PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Monday 10 October 2022 13:40:38 Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 07:22:56PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > On Monday 10 October 2022 12:28:18 Tom Rini wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Oct 09, 2022 at 09:12:25PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > > Hello! Watchdog code seems to be broken in u-boot master branch.
> > > > > On Nokia N900 I'm getting following message in qemu:
> > > > > 
> > > > > cyclic function rx51_watchdog took too long: 10000us vs 1000us max, disabling
> > > > > 
> > > > > Seems that watchdog core code is not prepared for "slower" watchdogs
> > > > > which communicate over slower i2c bus, like it is the case for N900.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Disabling slower watchdog is a bad idea as it would result in reboot
> > > > > loop instead of slower - but working code.
> > > > 
> > > > So, looking at this in more detail, we have
> > > > CONFIG_CYCLIC_MAX_CPU_TIME_US as a configuration option (which is where
> > > > the too long comes from). And picking a random CI run:
> > > > https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/jobs/511177
> > > > I do see we hit this in CI once, but not every time, QEMU runs here. Is
> > > > that the max time is configurable enough to satisfy your concerns here?
> > > 
> > > It is needed to investigate, how to _properly_ fix this issue, not just
> > > workarounded it. Probably other boards may be affected.
> > 
> > So it's the cyclic watchdog code, which we merged as early as possible
> > that's the reason here. And it was merged as early as we could to see if
> > there's problems. Are there problems? We're seeing "system too slow,
> > disabling" on QEMU, sometimes, and the value of too slow is
> > configurable. I know you reported other problems with n900 HW, so we
> > can't see if it's failing there
> 
> I was tested it with older asm code (as described in that other email,
> via git checkout commit -- file) on n900 HW and watchdog problem is
> there too. Phone reboots in about 20 seconds. But as I do not have
> serial console, I do not know if that "disabling" message is printed
> there too (but I guess it is).

I think I'm a bit baffled at this point, honestly. The watchdog timeout
is 60 seconds. If you're confident in it being about 20 seconds,
consistently, changing WATCHDOG_TIMEOUT_MSECS to say 10000 (so, 10
seconds) should let you see if U-Boot has configured the watchdog and
it's being tripped, or if it's still at the prior stage value.

I would have expected that QEMU would see problems that real HW doesn't
(the value in your log is much higher than the one in CI), but I could
be wrong here.

-- 
Tom

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 659 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2022-10-10 17:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-09 19:12 Broken watchdog in u-boot master branch Pali Rohár
2022-10-10 13:55 ` Tom Rini
2022-10-10 16:19   ` Pali Rohár
2022-10-11  7:18   ` Rasmus Villemoes
2022-10-11  7:25     ` Pali Rohár
2022-10-17  6:52     ` Stefan Roese
2022-10-10 16:28 ` Tom Rini
2022-10-10 17:22   ` Pali Rohár
2022-10-10 17:40     ` Tom Rini
2022-10-10 17:44       ` Pali Rohár
2022-10-10 17:56         ` Tom Rini [this message]
2022-10-10 18:01           ` Pali Rohár
2022-10-10 18:14             ` Tom Rini
2022-10-10 19:24               ` Tom Rini
2022-10-10 19:33                 ` Pali Rohár

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221010175610.GQ2020586@bill-the-cat \
    --to=trini@konsulko.com \
    --cc=pali@kernel.org \
    --cc=sr@denx.de \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox