From: Neha Malcom Francis <n-francis@ti.com>
To: <u-boot@lists.denx.de>
Cc: <n-francis@ti.com>, <nm@ti.com>, <matwey.kornilov@gmail.com>,
<robertcnelson@gmail.com>, <trini@konsulko.com>,
<vigneshr@ti.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] board: ti: common: board_detect: Fix EEPROM read quirk for 2-byte
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 11:57:34 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221213062734.10930-1-n-francis@ti.com> (raw)
EEPROM detection logic in ti_i2c_eeprom_get() involves figuring out
whether addressing is 1-byte or 2-byte. There are currently different
behaviours seen across boards as documented in commit bf6376642fe8
("board: ti: common: board_detect: Fix EEPROM read quirk"). Adding to
the list, we see that there are 2-byte EEPROMs that read properly
with 1-byte addressing with no offset.
For ti_i2c_eeprom_am6_get where eeprom parse operation is dynamic, the
earlier commit d2ab2a2bafd5 ("board: ti: common: board_detect: Fix
EEPROM read quirk for AM6 style data") tried to resolve this by running
ti_i2c_eeprom_get() twice. However this commit along with its former
commit fails on J7 platforms where EEPROM successfully return back the
header on 1-byte addressing and continues to do so until an offset is
introduced. So the second read incorrectly determines the EEPROM as
1-byte addressing.
A more generic solution is introduced here to solve
this issue: 1-byte read without offset and 1-byte read with offset. If
both passes, it follows 1-byte addressing else we proceed with 2-byte
addressing check.
Tested on J721E, J7200, DRA7xx, AM64x
Signed-off-by: Neha Malcom Francis <n-francis@ti.com>
Fixes: d2ab2a2bafd5 (board: ti: common: board_detect: Fix EEPROM read quirk for AM6 style data)
Fixes: bf6376642fe8 (board: ti: common: board_detect: Fix EEPROM read quirk)
---
board/ti/common/board_detect.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
Changes since v1:
- modified algorithm for boards that do not have CONFIG_DM_I2C
enabled as well
diff --git a/board/ti/common/board_detect.c b/board/ti/common/board_detect.c
index c37629fe8a..9b32076ab9 100644
--- a/board/ti/common/board_detect.c
+++ b/board/ti/common/board_detect.c
@@ -87,6 +87,8 @@ static int __maybe_unused ti_i2c_eeprom_get(int bus_addr, int dev_addr,
u32 header, u32 size, uint8_t *ep)
{
int rc;
+ uint8_t offset_test;
+ bool one_byte_addressing = true;
#if CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(DM_I2C)
struct udevice *dev;
@@ -114,8 +116,23 @@ static int __maybe_unused ti_i2c_eeprom_get(int bus_addr, int dev_addr,
*/
(void)dm_i2c_read(dev, 0, ep, size);
+ if (*((u32 *)ep) != header)
+ one_byte_addressing = false;
+
+ /*
+ * Handle case of bad 2 byte eeproms that responds to 1 byte addressing
+ * but gets stuck in const addressing when read requests are performed
+ * on offsets. We perform an offset test to make sure it is not a 2 byte
+ * eeprom that works with 1 byte addressing but just without an offset
+ */
+
+ rc = dm_i2c_read(dev, 0x1, &offset_test, sizeof(offset_test));
+
+ if (*((u32 *)ep) != (header & 0xFF))
+ one_byte_addressing = false;
+
/* Corrupted data??? */
- if (*((u32 *)ep) != header) {
+ if (!one_byte_addressing) {
/*
* read the eeprom header using i2c again, but use only a
* 2 byte address (some newer boards need this..)
@@ -151,8 +168,23 @@ static int __maybe_unused ti_i2c_eeprom_get(int bus_addr, int dev_addr,
*/
(void)i2c_read(dev_addr, 0x0, byte, ep, size);
+ if (*((u32 *)ep) != header)
+ one_byte_addressing = false;
+
+ /*
+ * Handle case of bad 2 byte eeproms that responds to 1 byte addressing
+ * but gets stuck in const addressing when read requests are performed
+ * on offsets. We perform an offset test to make sure it is not a 2 byte
+ * eeprom that works with 1 byte addressing but just without an offset
+ */
+
+ rc = i2c_read(dev, 0x1, byte, &offset_test, sizeof(offset_test));
+
+ if (*((u32 *)ep) != (header & 0xFF))
+ one_byte_addressing = false;
+
/* Corrupted data??? */
- if (*((u32 *)ep) != header) {
+ if (!one_byte_addressing) {
/*
* read the eeprom header using i2c again, but use only a
* 2 byte address (some newer boards need this..)
@@ -444,16 +476,6 @@ int __maybe_unused ti_i2c_eeprom_am6_get(int bus_addr, int dev_addr,
if (rc)
return rc;
- /*
- * Handle case of bad 2 byte eeproms that responds to 1 byte addressing
- * but gets stuck in const addressing when read requests are performed
- * on offsets. We re-read the board ID to ensure we have sane data back
- */
- rc = ti_i2c_eeprom_get(bus_addr, dev_addr, TI_EEPROM_HEADER_MAGIC,
- sizeof(board_id), (uint8_t *)&board_id);
- if (rc)
- return rc;
-
if (board_id.header.id != TI_AM6_EEPROM_RECORD_BOARD_ID) {
pr_err("%s: Invalid board ID record!\n", __func__);
return -EINVAL;
--
2.34.1
next reply other threads:[~2022-12-13 6:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-13 6:27 Neha Malcom Francis [this message]
2022-12-13 16:42 ` [PATCH v2] board: ti: common: board_detect: Fix EEPROM read quirk for 2-byte Tom Rini
2022-12-17 14:04 ` Matwey V. Kornilov
2023-01-03 15:42 ` Tom Rini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221213062734.10930-1-n-francis@ti.com \
--to=n-francis@ti.com \
--cc=matwey.kornilov@gmail.com \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=robertcnelson@gmail.com \
--cc=trini@konsulko.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox