From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from phobos.denx.de (phobos.denx.de [85.214.62.61]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CC9EC77B7D for ; Thu, 18 May 2023 11:25:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from h2850616.stratoserver.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by phobos.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9EB585DCE; Thu, 18 May 2023 13:25:46 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=microchip.com Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=microchip.com header.i=@microchip.com header.b="T0rvwLbO"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by phobos.denx.de (Postfix, from userid 109) id 26732860D4; Thu, 18 May 2023 13:25:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from esa.microchip.iphmx.com (esa.microchip.iphmx.com [68.232.154.123]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by phobos.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72AC685CD8 for ; Thu, 18 May 2023 13:25:43 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=microchip.com Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=Conor.Dooley@microchip.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=microchip.com; i=@microchip.com; q=dns/txt; s=mchp; t=1684409143; x=1715945143; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=KPipI87LRIbP/OpMGuyK3E2LESwrrGgto5bVP90IVRI=; b=T0rvwLbOMC6RzMhytaSXFJ7kfnMjhz69ITRMOzFQSuoO4WHgLHIm13qN O7D+2gzBhGtmsdlIo2eoMN7tikG5hUnAV2a3NfAV2hX1q9ZIHc4pnBlkF OgQBjKt8lpG+dEMTVx0M5t5uRiXTDt0HRUk/1X1yn/ecZe8rGIqg9Bjqj ePQNUCRPX3yfXZm+D+Iu0q7H4HgB0408Pwk8Qrp/VwYcHOJZIPzw1Tj4H T7o+bozRPsCF1cNBbSw0PsnRE16v/NQ5NSPDDfi4XhiMbWIDT4VIVtzo7 qGa/Wc45jmUdL9PvxEoSQOkO5SKBrhKfQ2UPxqKfkWGjgHu/1DnuvWYJ5 w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.99,285,1677567600"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="216085961" X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN Received: from unknown (HELO email.microchip.com) ([170.129.1.10]) by esa2.microchip.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA256; 18 May 2023 04:25:38 -0700 Received: from chn-vm-ex01.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.143) by chn-vm-ex03.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.21; Thu, 18 May 2023 04:25:35 -0700 Received: from wendy (10.10.115.15) by chn-vm-ex01.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.143) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.21 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 18 May 2023 04:25:32 -0700 Date: Thu, 18 May 2023 12:25:11 +0100 From: Conor Dooley To: Andrew Jones CC: , , Paul Walmsley , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Alistair Francis , Anup Patel , Atish Patra , Jessica Clarke , Rick Chen , Leo , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] dt-bindings: riscv: deprecate riscv,isa Message-ID: <20230518-resurrect-copy-0ecd9eaaca1e@wendy> References: <20230518-thermos-sanitary-cf3fbc777ea1@wendy> <20230518-4050231ca8dbe93c08cf9c9a@orel> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="kb7QvTX+biQwTglT" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230518-4050231ca8dbe93c08cf9c9a@orel> X-BeenThere: u-boot@lists.denx.de X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39 Precedence: list List-Id: U-Boot discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de Sender: "U-Boot" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.8 at phobos.denx.de X-Virus-Status: Clean --kb7QvTX+biQwTglT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 12:31:51PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote: > > + # Additional Standard Extensions, sorted by category then alphabetic= ally >=20 > Can we just do pure alphabetically? And the single-letter extensions above > don't have a "sorted by" comment above them. I guess they need one, or > maybe they can also be alphabetical? Maybe it is just me, but my brain is too used to seeing those ones in something approaching canonical order. I'd rather keep them that way & then alphanumerical for everything else? I also noticed that the CMO stuff wasn't actually in the comment's order anyway, so needs a re-sort to begin with. A vote in favour of alphanumerical. --kb7QvTX+biQwTglT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYIAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCZGYLFwAKCRB4tDGHoIJi 0grUAQCAc20dh6ItbijltjfIQVgSoT3hDJT0l6RFsHHzB6r/XgEA+HoYzGYleux9 54r2MbYTuE0fuZ9acteU6CIgBsX0Fg0= =8leH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --kb7QvTX+biQwTglT--