From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from phobos.denx.de (phobos.denx.de [85.214.62.61]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B096C7EE2E for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2023 19:11:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from h2850616.stratoserver.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by phobos.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B79838211C; Mon, 12 Jun 2023 21:11:50 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Jd8VnQU2"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by phobos.denx.de (Postfix, from userid 109) id E4FFA860C3; Mon, 12 Jun 2023 21:11:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [139.178.84.217]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by phobos.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A152980375 for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2023 21:11:45 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kabel@kernel.org Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63E76617A7; Mon, 12 Jun 2023 19:11:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 01C0BC433EF; Mon, 12 Jun 2023 19:11:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1686597103; bh=AJs0LD6YnU1ZytJumABQkFr17S+erpQBrx5AaK+p5Ew=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Jd8VnQU2Ol5Ow0ID7Yqy/Dpo8CTbUUzNnpRhlmhypywL1iJMUOuWalJajvJFcD0mV mY3fw6ftcm82AKknfFlSp6vFDWvfk3LyfEuPgnV7zQALjzgr6kSSxF6akduCc9B3Is Bkf7DTzkYCR5AdMEFHj5DY91ueNLiFgLJk1/oG14qbHKiHCwi0Tl4QHZ5o6GF6EGPd 9l1AwI4FNwNmoZLgbyUzIgvJfqN+qtUJFQ4T0HdWzAAbEb+44sGZ96ve/hfA2emuJW w8lzNppBDrMKjgdD0vHF5qeNwOIcbcmYsX/hDuG2U6N69fH2EDoMGR7KLO8Mm9bclk knjSF+pHnZBEQ== Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2023 21:11:38 +0200 From: Marek =?UTF-8?B?QmVow7pu?= To: Tom Rini Cc: Pali =?UTF-8?B?Um9ow6Fy?= , Stefan Roese , Tony Dinh , Martin Rowe , U-Boot Mailing List , Peng Fan , Jaehoon Chung Subject: Re: mmc: Read eMMC partition access bits before card reset Message-ID: <20230612211138.77cb340d@thinkpad> In-Reply-To: <20230612181141.GP835503@bill-the-cat> References: <20230516153620.GH2398826@bill-the-cat> <20230516185223.2vew4jqy36ytfyyc@pali> <20230516185646.GL2398826@bill-the-cat> <20230516223010.fnkjgjyoixwc2ls2@pali> <512f1507-2aaf-34ef-753a-5da3146a5f91@denx.de> <57c4657d-0f08-63ea-7d1d-02db0d1c0686@denx.de> <20230611130304.tpa2qhgthoxylc44@pali> <20230612173920.33qpzzrtqlk2g5qk@pali> <20230612181141.GP835503@bill-the-cat> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.1 (GTK 3.24.37; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: u-boot@lists.denx.de X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39 Precedence: list List-Id: U-Boot discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de Sender: "U-Boot" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.8 at phobos.denx.de X-Virus-Status: Clean On Mon, 12 Jun 2023 14:11:41 -0400 Tom Rini wrote: > On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 07:39:20PM +0200, Pali Roh=C3=A1r wrote: > > On Monday 12 June 2023 11:22:12 Stefan Roese wrote: =20 > > > Hi Pali, > > >=20 > > > (added Peng for PowerPC and Jaehoon for MMC to Cc) > > >=20 > > > On 6/11/23 15:03, Pali Roh=C3=A1r wrote: > > >=20 > > > > > > =20 > > > > > Pali, I will try to pull these not applied patches - if there are= not > > > > > issues of course. Could you please send me a list of these patche= s so > > > > > that I can take look? Please note that I will probably not be abl= e to > > > > > work on this this week. But next week should be possible. > > > > >=20 > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Stefan =20 > > > >=20 > > > > Hello! > > > >=20 > > > > These patches are on the list for year: > > > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20220516090119.202= 17-1-pali@kernel.org/ =20 > > >=20 > > > This patch fails with multiple problems. Reason is, that it's very "o= ld" > > > and many of the Kconfig stuff was changed, which is of course not your > > > fault. Still, I'm not in the right position to make these changes I'm > > > afraid. > > >=20 > > > Peng, this patch is now assigned to you in patchwork. Could you please > > > also take a look? And if Pali (or someone else) sends an updated > > > version, could you please make sure that it's reviewed (and applied if > > > no issues arise) in due time? =20 > >=20 > > Updated version was already sent but again no response... > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20220817205622.26644-1= -pali@kernel.org/ =20 >=20 > I was expecting Marek Beh=C3=BAn to follow up and take this as he's the o= ne > that volunteered to take over one of the powerpc custodian trees and > push this through. I've replied now with more feedback. Please also look at my reply at https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2023-June/520031.html To recapitulate - Pali worked on this over a year ago, he has done quite a lot of work - it wasn't accepted at the time due to how some things changed in U-Boot - things regarding the conversion of CONFIG_ options, which Pali disagreed with since some of it was done in a wrong way. He wanted those changes to be reverted whole - I promised Pali to work it out, once I had time to look into it. I expected to be able to do it in october / november. Unfortunately I wasn't able to, things have been quite hectic since then (I was working on my diploma thesis and afterwards when I returned to work, more pressing things took precedence) Thus I quite understand why Pali is frustrated, since he has done the work over a year ago. I am awfully sorry about this :-( By no means I have forgotten about this. We at Turris still want to work on this, since we are still interested in maintaining Turris 1.x. We are currently in the process of hiring new kernel developers, and so hopefully I will be able to work on this issue soon. Marek