Re: [PATCH v2] powerpc: Add support for CZ.NIC Turris 1.x routers

[Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2322 bytes --]

On Sun, Jun 25, 2023 at 05:27:49PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Saturday 24 June 2023 12:57:46 Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 24, 2023 at 11:19:51AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > On Monday 12 June 2023 14:07:24 Tom Rini wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 10:56:22PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > CZ.NIC Turris 1.0 and 1.1 are open source routers, they have dual-core
> > > > > PowerPC Freescale P2020 CPU and are based on Freescale P2020RDB-PC-A board.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Hardware design is fully open source, all firmware and hardware design
> > > > > files are available at Turris project website:
> > > > > 
> > > > > https://docs.turris.cz/hw/turris-1x/turris-1x/
> > > > > https://project.turris.cz/en/hardware.html
> > > > > 
> > > > > This patch adds full U-Boot support for CZ.NIC Turris 1.x routers. P2020
> > > > > BootROM can load U-Boot either from NOR flash or from SD card. So there is
> > > > > defconfig file turris_1x_nor_defconfig which builds NOR version and
> > > > > defconfig file turris_1x_sdcard_defconfig which builds SD card version.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Design of CZ.NIC Turris 1.x routers is based on Freescale P2020RDB-PC-A
> > > > > board, so common board code from boards/freescale/p1_p2_rdb_pc directory is
> > > > > shared and linked also into Turris 1.x U-Boot board code.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Turris 1.x code in this patch uses modern distroboot and can boot Linux
> > > > > kernel from various locations, including NAND, SD card, USB flash disks,
> > > > > NVMe disks or SATA disks (connected to extra SATA/SCSI PCIe controllers).
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár <pali@kernel.org>
> > > > 
> > > > To be clear, this is something that if there's still interest in
> > > > upstreaming this platform, this patch needs to be rebased and re-tested
> > > > as it's non-trivially out of date.  In addition:
> > > 
> > > Meanwhile I have already done rebase and retest, v3 is here:
> > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20220831164821.29109-1-pali@kernel.org/
> > 
> > Yes, and I replied to that with feedback.
> 
> Seems that there is no feeback on above patch.

Well, you're right, everything that is in this thread, and still applies
right now is I guess in the v2 thread instead?

-- 
Tom

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 659 bytes --]