From: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
To: Simon Glass <sjg@google.com>
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] CI: Add automatic retry for test.py jobs
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2023 13:08:59 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230712170859.GA2066889@bill-the-cat> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPnjgZ3irbbr0_Gb+BKJk=-rjG0s6aVUOeCekJxB3pTy=0n9kA@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1276 bytes --]
On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 08:00:23AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Tue, 11 Jul 2023 at 20:33, Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> wrote:
> >
> > It is not uncommon for some of the QEMU-based jobs to fail not because
> > of a code issue but rather because of a timing issue or similar problem
> > that is out of our control. Make use of the keywords that Azure and
> > GitLab provide so that we will automatically re-run these when they fail
> > 2 times. If they fail that often it is likely we have found a real issue
> > to investigate.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
> > ---
> > .azure-pipelines.yml | 1 +
> > .gitlab-ci.yml | 1 +
> > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> This seems like a slippery slope. Do we know why things fail? I wonder
> if we should disable the tests / builders instead, until it can be
> corrected?
It happens in Azure, so it's not just the broken runner problem we have
in GitLab. And the problem is timing, as I said in the commit.
Sometimes we still get the RTC test failing. Other times we don't get
QEMU + U-Boot spawned in time (most often m68k, but sometimes x86).
> I'll note that we don't have this problem with sandbox tests.
OK, but that's not relevant?
--
Tom
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 659 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-12 17:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-12 2:33 [PATCH] CI: Add automatic retry for test.py jobs Tom Rini
2023-07-12 14:00 ` Simon Glass
2023-07-12 17:08 ` Tom Rini [this message]
2023-07-12 20:32 ` Simon Glass
2023-07-12 20:38 ` Tom Rini
2023-07-13 21:03 ` Simon Glass
2023-07-13 21:57 ` Tom Rini
2023-07-15 23:40 ` Simon Glass
2023-07-16 18:17 ` Tom Rini
2023-07-27 19:18 ` Simon Glass
2023-07-27 20:35 ` Tom Rini
2023-08-17 13:41 ` Simon Glass
2023-07-21 1:30 ` Tom Rini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230712170859.GA2066889@bill-the-cat \
--to=trini@konsulko.com \
--cc=sjg@google.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox