From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from phobos.denx.de (phobos.denx.de [85.214.62.61]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 662D1EB64DC for ; Mon, 17 Jul 2023 16:01:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from h2850616.stratoserver.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by phobos.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 989DE8666F; Mon, 17 Jul 2023 18:01:50 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=denx.de Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=denx.de; s=phobos-20191101; t=1689609710; bh=Aud8oRblgl0vkT2BJp/TMv8eldOMMautQShbZdkVgr0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From; b=yBU9x8gWVABffp34FgWeRIJo/QyEeHDHIz73t2Fa1EYCDEUJWnOQAr6c01ZMs/FPx orlMt1JImPUUurGdsswAmo/m9u7U9jDQXfIKkRXjrq/WIGdsJvV4St3G1gbM8TqkN6 Qcu7Kmw50ffewO5g510rJjsGYwlDXtyyPgg/wul7AslfQVM6wK9dVVBDnv2kZXAV6L PHTXgFAb9OVqGmUE6gDcMzfjzQIZ/xw0FRf/9270yIIFeLGJEqSrru5LfQ0krNuIiE 5IJSw/BS7rGZ1K2wgZsDn2NcCa26LPsxpLIJ2r3aJeP+OTFwPvqm86hUePyUxI+6Lc xXA5bwqfZC2cQ== Received: from crub (pd95f1621.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [217.95.22.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: agust@denx.de) by phobos.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B1D2B86637; Mon, 17 Jul 2023 18:01:48 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=denx.de; s=phobos-20191101; t=1689609708; bh=Aud8oRblgl0vkT2BJp/TMv8eldOMMautQShbZdkVgr0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=r8sJesbLTo+lWLTYqGCStfQAb2FrjZRjw6oht7uX0h5wp7nQS47xB5hd1/b7DrxU1 ZoQM0Ro4f3wtW/u6GR35Um4cJ2JiJIGNUv2nDyFJY53wdXNIinjLitOQpfPeTma6lB MFXPGRAUYx6OcmH/srWFNUB56+sWRvnXEGwkKZG9YnYdh48WoJWYpVncXPg4jgkPGq VU3e+tFey++Vjjz8NWqZCMVHd11SAnEhQXcRN4V+3WnJVkjXCnel0HBULLu1F0eA0N j7vgZmtYhq4THv9snXhC0MY1JrnI/5Y8NIyKn/pGRbCw8eiTf/5JWJwVuZg3mFDEVr 70sOS/Bvj4FWg== Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2023 18:01:47 +0200 From: Anatolij Gustschin To: =?UTF-8?B?T25kxZllag==?= Jirman Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de, Simon Glass , Philipp Tomsich , Kever Yang , Chris Morgan Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Some fixes for the rockchip dw_mipi_dsi driver Message-ID: <20230717180147.35139f91@crub> In-Reply-To: References: <20230522214708.3886796-1-megi@xff.cz> <20230713174747.3c96ecb8@crub> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: u-boot@lists.denx.de X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39 Precedence: list List-Id: U-Boot discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de Sender: "U-Boot" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.8 at phobos.denx.de X-Virus-Status: Clean On Thu, 13 Jul 2023 18:03:48 +0200 Ond=C5=99ej Jirman megi@xff.cz wrote: > On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 05:47:47PM +0200, Anatolij Gustschin wrote: > >=20 > > On Thu, 13 Jul 2023 16:51:36 +0200 > > Ond=C5=99ej Jirman megi@xff.cz wrote: > > =20 > > > Hi, > > >=20 > > > On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 11:47:00PM +0200, megi xff wrote: =20 > > > >=20 > > > >=20 > > > > From: Ondrej Jirman > > > >=20 > > > > These are just random fixes for bugs I found while eyeballing the c= ode and porting > > > > it to work with RK3399. =20 > > >=20 > > > It would be nice if somebody merged this. I'd like to add display sup= port for > > > a few boards, and these patches are just fairly obvious bugfixes in n= ew code > > > added in 2023.07 that I hoped would get merged in the bugfix part of = the merge > > > window. =20 > >=20 > > I hoped to get a Tested-by for this series to make sure it does not bre= ak > > current users. =20 >=20 > It's a miracle it even works for the current users, given the wrong > way the current code writes to GRF registers, which makes it to have > no intended effect, etc. >=20 > Anyway, is there some upper limit to wait for Tested-by? 2 months seems > excessive. Just so I can remind myself sooner next time. :) >=20 > I can understand a few weeks, but 2 months just deters contributions. I usually apply new patches during the merge window (we have three months release cycle) and this patch series was sent when the merge window was closed. If patches are bug fixes (like in this case) I prefer to get them tested by someone who has the actual hardware. When there is an Acked-by or Tested-by, then I apply the fixes for -rcX. We already had several cases in the past where simple and obvious timing fixes in the driver broke display support for in tree boards, therefore I'm somewhat reluctant to apply fixes for -rcX without Tested-by. -- Anatolij