From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Cc: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>,
u-boot@lists.denx.de, Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>,
Lukasz Majewski <lukma@denx.de>, Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] cmd: bind: Add unbind command with driver filter
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2023 17:12:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230804171206.07faade4@xps-13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8902cf54-acba-cfb4-571b-09ba807e7a89@denx.de>
Hi,
marex@denx.de wrote on Fri, 4 Aug 2023 17:05:01 +0200:
> On 8/4/23 17:01, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 04, 2023 at 04:42:13PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >> On 8/4/23 09:00, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> >>> Hi Marek,
> >>>
> >>> marex@denx.de wrote on Wed, 2 Aug 2023 14:46:54 +0200:
> >>>
> >>>> Extend the driver core to perform lookup by both OF node and driver
> >>>> bound to the node. Use this to look up specific device instances to
> >>>> unbind from nodes in the unbind command. One example where this is
> >>>> needed is USB peripheral controller, which may have multiple gadget
> >>>> drivers bound to it. The unbind command has to select that specific
> >>>> gadget driver instance to unbind from the controller, not unbind the
> >>>> controller driver itself from the controller.
> >>>>
> >>>> USB ethernet gadget usage looks as follows with this change. Notice
> >>>> the extra 'usb_ether' addition in the 'unbind' command at the end.
> >>>> "
> >>>> bind /soc/usb-otg@49000000 usb_ether
> >>>> setenv ethact usb_ether
> >>>> setenv loadaddr 0xc2000000
> >>>> setenv ipaddr 10.0.0.2
> >>>> setenv serverip 10.0.0.1
> >>>> setenv netmask 255.255.255.0
> >>>> tftpboot 0xc2000000 10.0.0.1:test.file
> >>>> unbind /soc/usb-otg@49000000 usb_ether
> >>>
> >>> This extra parameter does not seem to work on the BBBW. I cannot select
> >>> the "usb_ether" driver like you do.
> >>>
> >>> Good news though, I am now able to use fastboot, but it is not
> >>> straightforward:
> >>>
> >>> Here is my sequence right after the boot (reducing the dm tree output
> >>> to the usb nodes for clarity):
> >>>
> >>> => dm tree
> >>> misc 0 [ + ] ti-musb-wrapper | |-- usb@47400000
> >>> usb 0 [ + ] ti-musb-peripheral | | |-- usb@47401000
> >>> ethernet 1 [ + ] usb_ether | | | `-- usb_ether
> >>> bootdev 3 [ ] eth_bootdev | | | `-- usb_ether.bootdev
> >>> usb 0 [ ] ti-musb-host | | `-- usb@47401800
> >>> => fastboot usb 0
> >>> couldn't find an available UDC
> >>> g_dnl_register: failed!, error: -19
> >>
> >> That is expected and not a bug, since the beagle explicitly binds USB
> >> ethernet to MUSB gadget in board file, which is legacy deprecated way.
> >
> > So, we should do away with, probably all of arch_misc_init() in
> > arch/arm/mach-omap2/am33xx/board.c for the non-SPL case.
>
> Yes
>
> >>> exit not allowed from main input shell.
> >>> => unbind /ocp/usb@47400000/usb@47401000 usb_ether
> >>
> >> Does
> >>
> >> => unbind ethernet 0
> >>
> >> work ?
> >>
> >> If so, 1/4 in this series can be skipped altogether.
> >>
> >> You likely won't even need the rebinding of ti-musb-peripheral anymore.
> >>
> >>> Cannot find a device with path /ocp/usb@47400000/usb@47401000
> >>> => unbind /ocp/usb@47400000/usb@47401000
> >>> => dm tree
> >>> misc 0 [ + ] ti-musb-wrapper | |-- usb@47400000
> >>> usb 0 [ ] ti-musb-host | | `-- usb@47401800
> >>> => fastboot usb 0
> >>> => bind /ocp/usb@47400000/usb@47401000 ti-musb-peripheral
> >>> => dm tree
> >>> misc 0 [ + ] ti-musb-wrapper | |-- usb@47400000
> >>> usb 0 [ ] ti-musb-host | | |-- usb@47401800
> >>> usb 0 [ ] ti-musb-peripheral | | `-- usb@47401000
> >>> => fastboot usb 0
> >>> musb-hdrc: peripheral reset irq lost!
> >>> # works! (the irq-related line above as always been there)
> >>>
> >>> So now, how do we make this process easy/understandable?
> >>
> >> What would be your proposal ?
At least I would appreciate:
- to select CMD_BIND "by default" when relevant
- to make the fastboot error more readable for the regular user
If you want to get rid of all the legacy code, I am not opposed,
really, but that must not be the user who is responsible for
understanding what changed in the "core". It must be very easily
accessible to understand that now:
- manual binding/unbinding is needed
- which driver must be used when
> > Well, what's needed / is it possible to get to the point where we don't
> > _need_ to call bind/unbind for each of these cases? Is there something
> > we're supposed to be setting in the DT that we aren't?
>
> You do need to unbind the ethernet before using fastboot, always, with the 'unbind ethernet 0', you dont need the peripheral unbind/rebind part, so it should behave like before.
And for my own understanding, why don't we need to bind a fastboot
gadget?
Thanks,
Miquèl
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-04 15:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-02 12:46 [PATCH v4 1/4] cmd: bind: Add unbind command with driver filter Marek Vasut
2023-08-02 12:46 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] usb: gadget: ether: Inline functions used once Marek Vasut
2023-08-02 12:46 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] usb: gadget: ether: Move probe function above driver structure Marek Vasut
2023-08-02 12:46 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] usb: gadget: ether: Handle gadget driver registration in probe and remove Marek Vasut
2023-08-02 21:31 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] cmd: bind: Add unbind command with driver filter Simon Glass
2023-08-02 22:04 ` Marek Vasut
2023-08-04 7:00 ` Miquel Raynal
2023-08-04 14:42 ` Marek Vasut
2023-08-04 15:01 ` Tom Rini
2023-08-04 15:05 ` Marek Vasut
2023-08-04 15:12 ` Miquel Raynal [this message]
2023-08-04 15:40 ` Marek Vasut
2023-08-04 16:00 ` Miquel Raynal
2023-08-04 16:15 ` Tom Rini
2023-08-04 17:01 ` Miquel Raynal
2023-08-04 17:18 ` Marek Vasut
2023-08-04 17:20 ` Tom Rini
2023-08-04 18:01 ` Miquel Raynal
2023-08-04 18:51 ` Tom Rini
2023-08-04 19:38 ` Miquel Raynal
2023-08-04 16:37 ` Tom Rini
2023-08-04 17:04 ` Miquel Raynal
2023-08-04 17:19 ` Marek Vasut
2023-08-04 17:23 ` Tom Rini
2023-08-04 17:24 ` Miquel Raynal
2023-08-04 17:31 ` Marek Vasut
2023-08-04 17:46 ` Miquel Raynal
2023-08-04 17:54 ` Marek Vasut
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230804171206.07faade4@xps-13 \
--to=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=khilman@baylibre.com \
--cc=lukma@denx.de \
--cc=marex@denx.de \
--cc=sjg@chromium.org \
--cc=trini@konsulko.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox