public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
To: Sam Edwards <cfsworks@gmail.com>
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de, Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>,
	Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>,
	Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>,
	Icenowy Zheng <uwu@icenowy.me>,
	Maksim Kiselev <bigunclemax@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] sunxi: psci: stop modeling register layout with C structs
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2023 01:48:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231022014836.3bff1cc4@slackpad.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231012014756.2573473-4-CFSworks@gmail.com>

On Wed, 11 Oct 2023 19:47:55 -0600
Sam Edwards <cfsworks@gmail.com> wrote:

> Since the sunxi support nowadays generally prefers #defined register
> offsets instead of modeling register layouts using C structs, now is a
> good time to do this for PSCI as well. This patch moves away from using
> the structs `sunxi_cpucfg_reg` and `sunxi_prcm_reg` in psci.c.
> 
> The former struct and its associated header file existed only to support
> PSCI code, so also delete them altogether.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sam Edwards <CFSworks@gmail.com>

Thanks for doing this!

Reviewed-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>

Cheers,
Andre

> ---
>  arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/psci.c          | 57 ++++++++------------
>  arch/arm/include/asm/arch-sunxi/cpucfg.h | 67 ------------------------
>  2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 101 deletions(-)
>  delete mode 100644 arch/arm/include/asm/arch-sunxi/cpucfg.h
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/psci.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/psci.c
> index 27ca9c39e1..207aa6bc4b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/psci.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/psci.c
> @@ -11,8 +11,6 @@
>  #include <asm/cache.h>
>  
>  #include <asm/arch/cpu.h>
> -#include <asm/arch/cpucfg.h>
> -#include <asm/arch/prcm.h>
>  #include <asm/armv7.h>
>  #include <asm/gic.h>
>  #include <asm/io.h>
> @@ -27,6 +25,17 @@
>  #define	GICD_BASE	(SUNXI_GIC400_BASE + GIC_DIST_OFFSET)
>  #define	GICC_BASE	(SUNXI_GIC400_BASE + GIC_CPU_OFFSET_A15)
>  
> +/*
> + * Offsets into the CPUCFG block applicable to most SUNXIs.
> + */
> +#define SUNXI_CPU_RST(cpu)			(0x40 + (cpu) * 0x40 + 0x0)
> +#define SUNXI_CPU_STATUS(cpu)			(0x40 + (cpu) * 0x40 + 0x8)
> +#define SUNXI_GEN_CTRL				(0x184)
> +#define SUNXI_PRIV0				(0x1a4)
> +#define SUN7I_CPU1_PWR_CLAMP			(0x1b0)
> +#define SUN7I_CPU1_PWROFF			(0x1b4)
> +#define SUNXI_DBG_CTRL1				(0x1e4)
> +
>  /*
>   * R40 is different from other single cluster SoCs.
>   *
> @@ -99,10 +108,7 @@ static void __secure sunxi_cpu_set_entry(int __always_unused cpu, void *entry)
>  		writel((u32)entry,
>  		       SUNXI_SRAMC_BASE + SUN8I_R40_SRAMC_SOFT_ENTRY_REG0);
>  	} else {
> -		struct sunxi_cpucfg_reg *cpucfg =
> -			(struct sunxi_cpucfg_reg *)SUNXI_CPUCFG_BASE;
> -
> -		writel((u32)entry, &cpucfg->priv0);
> +		writel((u32)entry, SUNXI_CPUCFG_BASE + SUNXI_PRIV0);
>  	}
>  }
>  
> @@ -110,26 +116,21 @@ static void __secure sunxi_cpu_set_power(int cpu, bool on)
>  {
>  	u32 *clamp = NULL;
>  	u32 *pwroff;
> -	struct sunxi_cpucfg_reg *cpucfg =
> -		(struct sunxi_cpucfg_reg *)SUNXI_CPUCFG_BASE;
>  
>  	/* sun7i (A20) is different from other single cluster SoCs */
>  	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MACH_SUN7I)) {
> -		clamp = &cpucfg->cpu1_pwr_clamp;
> -		pwroff = &cpucfg->cpu1_pwroff;
> +		clamp = (void *)SUNXI_CPUCFG_BASE + SUN7I_CPU1_PWR_CLAMP;
> +		pwroff = (void *)SUNXI_CPUCFG_BASE + SUN7I_CPU1_PWROFF;
>  		cpu = 0;
>  	} else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MACH_SUN8I_R40)) {
> -		clamp = (void *)cpucfg + SUN8I_R40_PWR_CLAMP(cpu);
> -		pwroff = (void *)cpucfg + SUN8I_R40_PWROFF;
> +		clamp = (void *)SUNXI_CPUCFG_BASE + SUN8I_R40_PWR_CLAMP(cpu);
> +		pwroff = (void *)SUNXI_CPUCFG_BASE + SUN8I_R40_PWROFF;
>  	} else {
> -		struct sunxi_prcm_reg *prcm =
> -			(struct sunxi_prcm_reg *)SUNXI_PRCM_BASE;
> -
>  		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MACH_SUN6I) ||
>  		    IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MACH_SUN8I_H3))
> -			clamp = &prcm->cpu_pwr_clamp[cpu];
> +			clamp = (void *)SUNXI_PRCM_BASE + 0x140 + cpu * 0x4;
>  
> -		pwroff = &prcm->cpu_pwroff;
> +		pwroff = (void *)SUNXI_PRCM_BASE + 0x100;
>  	}
>  
>  	if (on) {
> @@ -151,37 +152,25 @@ static void __secure sunxi_cpu_set_power(int cpu, bool on)
>  
>  static void __secure sunxi_cpu_set_reset(int cpu, bool reset)
>  {
> -	struct sunxi_cpucfg_reg *cpucfg =
> -		(struct sunxi_cpucfg_reg *)SUNXI_CPUCFG_BASE;
> -
> -	writel(reset ? 0b00 : 0b11, &cpucfg->cpu[cpu].rst);
> +	writel(reset ? 0b00 : 0b11, SUNXI_CPUCFG_BASE + SUNXI_CPU_RST(cpu));
>  }
>  
>  static void __secure sunxi_cpu_set_locking(int cpu, bool lock)
>  {
> -	struct sunxi_cpucfg_reg *cpucfg =
> -		(struct sunxi_cpucfg_reg *)SUNXI_CPUCFG_BASE;
> -
>  	if (lock)
> -		clrbits_le32(&cpucfg->dbg_ctrl1, BIT(cpu));
> +		clrbits_le32(SUNXI_CPUCFG_BASE + SUNXI_DBG_CTRL1, BIT(cpu));
>  	else
> -		setbits_le32(&cpucfg->dbg_ctrl1, BIT(cpu));
> +		setbits_le32(SUNXI_CPUCFG_BASE + SUNXI_DBG_CTRL1, BIT(cpu));
>  }
>  
>  static bool __secure sunxi_cpu_poll_wfi(int cpu)
>  {
> -	struct sunxi_cpucfg_reg *cpucfg =
> -		(struct sunxi_cpucfg_reg *)SUNXI_CPUCFG_BASE;
> -
> -	return !!(readl(&cpucfg->cpu[cpu].status) & BIT(2));
> +	return !!(readl(SUNXI_CPUCFG_BASE + SUNXI_CPU_STATUS(cpu)) & BIT(2));
>  }
>  
>  static void __secure sunxi_cpu_invalidate_cache(int cpu)
>  {
> -	struct sunxi_cpucfg_reg *cpucfg =
> -		(struct sunxi_cpucfg_reg *)SUNXI_CPUCFG_BASE;
> -
> -	clrbits_le32(&cpucfg->gen_ctrl, BIT(cpu));
> +	clrbits_le32(SUNXI_CPUCFG_BASE + SUNXI_GEN_CTRL, BIT(cpu));
>  }
>  
>  static void __secure sunxi_cpu_power_off(u32 cpuid)
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-sunxi/cpucfg.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-sunxi/cpucfg.h
> deleted file mode 100644
> index 4aaebe0a97..0000000000
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-sunxi/cpucfg.h
> +++ /dev/null
> @@ -1,67 +0,0 @@
> -/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ */
> -/*
> - * Sunxi A31 CPUCFG register definition.
> - *
> - * (C) Copyright 2014 Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com
> - */
> -
> -#ifndef _SUNXI_CPUCFG_H
> -#define _SUNXI_CPUCFG_H
> -
> -#include <linux/compiler.h>
> -#include <linux/types.h>
> -
> -#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> -
> -struct __packed sunxi_cpucfg_cpu {
> -	u32 rst;		/* base + 0x0 */
> -	u32 ctrl;		/* base + 0x4 */
> -	u32 status;		/* base + 0x8 */
> -	u8 res[0x34];		/* base + 0xc */
> -};
> -
> -struct __packed sunxi_cpucfg_reg {
> -	u8 res0[0x40];		/* 0x000 */
> -	struct sunxi_cpucfg_cpu cpu[4];		/* 0x040 */
> -	u8 res1[0x44];		/* 0x140 */
> -	u32 gen_ctrl;		/* 0x184 */
> -	u32 l2_status;		/* 0x188 */
> -	u8 res2[0x4];		/* 0x18c */
> -	u32 event_in;		/* 0x190 */
> -	u8 res3[0xc];		/* 0x194 */
> -	u32 super_standy_flag;	/* 0x1a0 */
> -	u32 priv0;		/* 0x1a4 */
> -	u32 priv1;		/* 0x1a8 */
> -	u8 res4[0x4];		/* 0x1ac */
> -	u32 cpu1_pwr_clamp;	/* 0x1b0 sun7i only */
> -	u32 cpu1_pwroff;	/* 0x1b4 sun7i only */
> -	u8 res5[0x2c];		/* 0x1b8 */
> -	u32 dbg_ctrl1;		/* 0x1e4 */
> -	u8 res6[0x18];		/* 0x1e8 */
> -	u32 idle_cnt0_low;	/* 0x200 */
> -	u32 idle_cnt0_high;	/* 0x204 */
> -	u32 idle_cnt0_ctrl;	/* 0x208 */
> -	u8 res8[0x4];		/* 0x20c */
> -	u32 idle_cnt1_low;	/* 0x210 */
> -	u32 idle_cnt1_high;	/* 0x214 */
> -	u32 idle_cnt1_ctrl;	/* 0x218 */
> -	u8 res9[0x4];		/* 0x21c */
> -	u32 idle_cnt2_low;	/* 0x220 */
> -	u32 idle_cnt2_high;	/* 0x224 */
> -	u32 idle_cnt2_ctrl;	/* 0x228 */
> -	u8 res10[0x4];		/* 0x22c */
> -	u32 idle_cnt3_low;	/* 0x230 */
> -	u32 idle_cnt3_high;	/* 0x234 */
> -	u32 idle_cnt3_ctrl;	/* 0x238 */
> -	u8 res11[0x4];		/* 0x23c */
> -	u32 idle_cnt4_low;	/* 0x240 */
> -	u32 idle_cnt4_high;	/* 0x244 */
> -	u32 idle_cnt4_ctrl;	/* 0x248 */
> -	u8 res12[0x34];		/* 0x24c */
> -	u32 cnt64_ctrl;		/* 0x280 */
> -	u32 cnt64_low;		/* 0x284 */
> -	u32 cnt64_high;		/* 0x288 */
> -};
> -
> -#endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
> -#endif /* _SUNXI_CPUCFG_H */


  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-22  0:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-12  1:47 [PATCH v4 0/4] Allwinner R528/T113s PSCI Sam Edwards
2023-10-12  1:47 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] sunxi: psci: clean away preprocessor macros Sam Edwards
2023-10-12  1:47 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] sunxi: psci: refactor register access to separate functions Sam Edwards
2023-10-12  1:47 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] sunxi: psci: stop modeling register layout with C structs Sam Edwards
2023-10-22  0:48   ` Andre Przywara [this message]
2023-10-12  1:47 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] sunxi: psci: implement PSCI on R528 Sam Edwards
2023-10-22  0:49   ` Andre Przywara
2023-10-24 22:16     ` Andre Przywara
2023-10-22  0:53 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] Allwinner R528/T113s PSCI Andre Przywara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231022014836.3bff1cc4@slackpad.lan \
    --to=andre.przywara@arm.com \
    --cc=bigunclemax@gmail.com \
    --cc=cfsworks@gmail.com \
    --cc=jagan@amarulasolutions.com \
    --cc=jernej.skrabec@gmail.com \
    --cc=samuel@sholland.org \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    --cc=uwu@icenowy.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox