From: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
To: Sam Edwards <cfsworks@gmail.com>
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de, Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>,
Icenowy Zheng <uwu@icenowy.me>,
Maksim Kiselev <bigunclemax@gmail.com>,
Kevin Amadiva <kevin.amadiva@mec.at>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] sunxi: psci: implement PSCI on R528
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2023 01:49:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231022014949.58fa1bc0@slackpad.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231012014756.2573473-5-CFSworks@gmail.com>
On Wed, 11 Oct 2023 19:47:56 -0600
Sam Edwards <cfsworks@gmail.com> wrote:
> This patch adds the necessary code to make nonsec booting and PSCI
> secondary core management functional on the R528/T113.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sam Edwards <CFSworks@gmail.com>
> Tested-by: Maksim Kiselev <bigunclemax@gmail.com>
> Tested-by: Kevin Amadiva <kevin.amadiva@mec.at>
Thanks, that looks good now. It's debatable whether the Kconfig depends
on should be NCAT2 instead, but we can fix this when the need arises.
Reviewed-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Cheers,
Andre
> ---
> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/Kconfig | 3 ++-
> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/psci.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig | 4 +++
> 3 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/Kconfig b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/Kconfig
> index f015d133cb..4eb34b7b44 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/Kconfig
> @@ -61,8 +61,9 @@ config ARMV7_SECURE_MAX_SIZE
> config ARM_GIC_BASE_ADDRESS
> hex
> depends on ARMV7_NONSEC
> - depends on ARCH_EXYNOS5
> + depends on ARCH_EXYNOS5 || MACH_SUN8I_R528
> default 0x10480000 if ARCH_EXYNOS5
> + default 0x03020000 if MACH_SUN8I_R528
> help
> Override the GIC base address if the Arm Cortex defined
> CBAR/PERIPHBASE system register holds the wrong value.
> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/psci.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/psci.c
> index 207aa6bc4b..b03a865483 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/psci.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/psci.c
> @@ -47,6 +47,19 @@
> #define SUN8I_R40_PWR_CLAMP(cpu) (0x120 + (cpu) * 0x4)
> #define SUN8I_R40_SRAMC_SOFT_ENTRY_REG0 (0xbc)
>
> +/*
> + * R528 is also different, as it has both cores powered up (but held in reset
> + * state) after the SoC is reset. Like the R40, it uses a "soft" entry point
> + * address register, but unlike the R40, it uses a newer "CPUX" block to manage
> + * CPU state, rather than the older CPUCFG system.
> + */
> +#define SUN8I_R528_SOFT_ENTRY (0x1c8)
> +#define SUN8I_R528_C0_RST_CTRL (0x0000)
> +#define SUN8I_R528_C0_CTRL_REG0 (0x0010)
> +#define SUN8I_R528_C0_CPU_STATUS (0x0080)
> +
> +#define SUN8I_R528_C0_STATUS_STANDBYWFI (16)
> +
> static void __secure cp15_write_cntp_tval(u32 tval)
> {
> asm volatile ("mcr p15, 0, %0, c14, c2, 0" : : "r" (tval));
> @@ -103,10 +116,12 @@ static void __secure clamp_set(u32 *clamp)
>
> static void __secure sunxi_cpu_set_entry(int __always_unused cpu, void *entry)
> {
> - /* secondary core entry address is programmed differently on R40 */
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MACH_SUN8I_R40)) {
> writel((u32)entry,
> SUNXI_SRAMC_BASE + SUN8I_R40_SRAMC_SOFT_ENTRY_REG0);
> + } else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MACH_SUN8I_R528)) {
> + writel((u32)entry,
> + SUNXI_R_CPUCFG_BASE + SUN8I_R528_SOFT_ENTRY);
> } else {
> writel((u32)entry, SUNXI_CPUCFG_BASE + SUNXI_PRIV0);
> }
> @@ -125,6 +140,9 @@ static void __secure sunxi_cpu_set_power(int cpu, bool on)
> } else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MACH_SUN8I_R40)) {
> clamp = (void *)SUNXI_CPUCFG_BASE + SUN8I_R40_PWR_CLAMP(cpu);
> pwroff = (void *)SUNXI_CPUCFG_BASE + SUN8I_R40_PWROFF;
> + } else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MACH_SUN8I_R528)) {
> + /* R528 leaves both cores powered up, manages them via reset */
> + return;
> } else {
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MACH_SUN6I) ||
> IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MACH_SUN8I_H3))
> @@ -152,11 +170,27 @@ static void __secure sunxi_cpu_set_power(int cpu, bool on)
>
> static void __secure sunxi_cpu_set_reset(int cpu, bool reset)
> {
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MACH_SUN8I_R528)) {
> + if (reset)
> + clrbits_le32(SUNXI_CPUCFG_BASE + SUN8I_R528_C0_RST_CTRL,
> + BIT(cpu));
> + else
> + setbits_le32(SUNXI_CPUCFG_BASE + SUN8I_R528_C0_RST_CTRL,
> + BIT(cpu));
> +
> + return;
> + }
> +
> writel(reset ? 0b00 : 0b11, SUNXI_CPUCFG_BASE + SUNXI_CPU_RST(cpu));
> }
>
> static void __secure sunxi_cpu_set_locking(int cpu, bool lock)
> {
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MACH_SUN8I_R528)) {
> + /* Not required on R528 */
> + return;
> + }
> +
> if (lock)
> clrbits_le32(SUNXI_CPUCFG_BASE + SUNXI_DBG_CTRL1, BIT(cpu));
> else
> @@ -165,11 +199,22 @@ static void __secure sunxi_cpu_set_locking(int cpu, bool lock)
>
> static bool __secure sunxi_cpu_poll_wfi(int cpu)
> {
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MACH_SUN8I_R528)) {
> + return !!(readl(SUNXI_CPUCFG_BASE + SUN8I_R528_C0_CPU_STATUS) &
> + BIT(SUN8I_R528_C0_STATUS_STANDBYWFI + cpu));
> + }
> +
> return !!(readl(SUNXI_CPUCFG_BASE + SUNXI_CPU_STATUS(cpu)) & BIT(2));
> }
>
> static void __secure sunxi_cpu_invalidate_cache(int cpu)
> {
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MACH_SUN8I_R528)) {
> + clrbits_le32(SUNXI_CPUCFG_BASE + SUN8I_R528_C0_CTRL_REG0,
> + BIT(cpu));
> + return;
> + }
> +
> clrbits_le32(SUNXI_CPUCFG_BASE + SUNXI_GEN_CTRL, BIT(cpu));
> }
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig
> index e891e291f1..23b5b27b97 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig
> @@ -355,6 +355,10 @@ config MACH_SUN8I_R40
> config MACH_SUN8I_R528
> bool "sun8i (Allwinner R528)"
> select CPU_V7A
> + select CPU_V7_HAS_NONSEC
> + select CPU_V7_HAS_VIRT
> + select ARCH_SUPPORT_PSCI
> + select SPL_ARMV7_SET_CORTEX_SMPEN
> select SUNXI_GEN_NCAT2
> select SUNXI_NEW_PINCTRL
> select MMC_SUNXI_HAS_NEW_MODE
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-22 0:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-12 1:47 [PATCH v4 0/4] Allwinner R528/T113s PSCI Sam Edwards
2023-10-12 1:47 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] sunxi: psci: clean away preprocessor macros Sam Edwards
2023-10-12 1:47 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] sunxi: psci: refactor register access to separate functions Sam Edwards
2023-10-12 1:47 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] sunxi: psci: stop modeling register layout with C structs Sam Edwards
2023-10-22 0:48 ` Andre Przywara
2023-10-12 1:47 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] sunxi: psci: implement PSCI on R528 Sam Edwards
2023-10-22 0:49 ` Andre Przywara [this message]
2023-10-24 22:16 ` Andre Przywara
2023-10-22 0:53 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] Allwinner R528/T113s PSCI Andre Przywara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231022014949.58fa1bc0@slackpad.lan \
--to=andre.przywara@arm.com \
--cc=bigunclemax@gmail.com \
--cc=cfsworks@gmail.com \
--cc=jagan@amarulasolutions.com \
--cc=jernej.skrabec@gmail.com \
--cc=kevin.amadiva@mec.at \
--cc=samuel@sholland.org \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
--cc=uwu@icenowy.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox