From: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
To: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>,
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>,
sjg@chromium.org, ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org, jbx6244@gmail.com,
u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: Re: [RFC 11/13] fs: remove explicit efi configuration dependency
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2023 08:47:52 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231026124752.GF496310@bill-the-cat> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZTon3nThWP/XmkGd@octopus>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1917 bytes --]
On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 05:48:30PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 09:58:53AM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> >
> >
> > Am 26. Oktober 2023 07:30:50 MESZ schrieb AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>:
> > >Now it is clear that the feature actually depends on efi interfaces,
> > >not "bootefi" command. efi_set_bootdev() will automatically be nullified
> > >if necessary efi component is disabled.
> > >
> > >Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
> > >---
> > > fs/fs.c | 7 +++----
> > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > >
> > >diff --git a/fs/fs.c b/fs/fs.c
> > >index 4cb4310c9cc2..70cdb594c4c8 100644
> > >--- a/fs/fs.c
> > >+++ b/fs/fs.c
> > >@@ -791,10 +791,9 @@ int do_load(struct cmd_tbl *cmdtp, int flag, int argc, char *const argv[],
> > > return 1;
> > > }
> > >
> > >- if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CMD_BOOTEFI))
> > >- efi_set_bootdev(argv[1], (argc > 2) ? argv[2] : "",
> > >- (argc > 4) ? argv[4] : "", map_sysmem(addr, 0),
> > >- len_read);
> > >+ efi_set_bootdev(argv[1], (argc > 2) ? argv[2] : "",
> >
> > This function should not exist for CONFIG_EFI_LOADER=n. There are other places where the function is invoked. Please, review all of them.
>
> Please go through the whole patch set, especially patch#8
> "efi_loader: split unrelated code from efi_bootmgr.c".
>
> efi_[set|clear]_bootdev() will be nullified if not necessary.
In this case I think what we have here today is more readable / clearer.
We don't need empty functions as we can either do like this section of
the code does today or the linker will discard things correctly as it's
a case of funcB() calls funcA() and nothing calls funcB() so it will be
discarded. I don't know without digging through the series more what the
correct IS_ENABLED() guard should be here (and then also in patch #10).
--
Tom
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 659 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-26 12:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-26 5:30 [RFC 00/13] cmd: bootefi: refactor the code for bootmgr AKASHI Takahiro
2023-10-26 5:30 ` [RFC 01/13] cmd: bootefi: unfold do_bootefi_image() AKASHI Takahiro
2023-10-26 11:01 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2023-10-27 0:25 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2023-10-27 1:00 ` Tom Rini
2023-10-27 12:23 ` Ilias Apalodimas
2023-10-30 0:34 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2023-10-26 5:30 ` [RFC 02/13] cmd: bootefi: re-organize do_bootefi_image() AKASHI Takahiro
2023-10-26 10:44 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2023-10-26 12:47 ` Tom Rini
2023-10-27 0:35 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2023-10-26 5:30 ` [RFC 03/13] cmd: bootefi: carve out EFI boot manager interface AKASHI Takahiro
2023-10-26 5:30 ` [RFC 04/13] cmd: bootefi: carve out binary execution interface AKASHI Takahiro
2023-10-26 5:30 ` [RFC 05/13] cmd: bootefi: move library interfaces under lib/efi_loader AKASHI Takahiro
2023-10-26 5:30 ` [RFC 06/13] cmd: efidebug: ease efi configuration dependency AKASHI Takahiro
2023-10-26 5:30 ` [RFC 07/13] bootmeth: use efi_loader interfaces instead of bootefi command AKASHI Takahiro
2023-10-26 5:30 ` [RFC 08/13] efi_loader: split unrelated code from efi_bootmgr.c AKASHI Takahiro
2023-10-26 5:30 ` [RFC 09/13] efi_loader: rename BOOTEFI_BOOTMGR to EFI_BOOTMGR AKASHI Takahiro
2023-10-26 5:30 ` [RFC 10/13] net: tftp: remove explicit efi configuration dependency AKASHI Takahiro
2023-10-26 5:30 ` [RFC 11/13] fs: " AKASHI Takahiro
2023-10-26 7:58 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2023-10-26 8:48 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2023-10-26 12:47 ` Tom Rini [this message]
2023-10-27 0:59 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2023-10-27 1:04 ` Tom Rini
2023-10-26 5:30 ` [RFC 12/13] lib: uuid: move CONFIG_RANDOM_UUID AKASHI Takahiro
2023-10-26 12:47 ` Tom Rini
2023-10-27 12:24 ` Ilias Apalodimas
2023-10-26 5:30 ` [RFC 13/13] block: rkmtd: select CONFIG_RANDOM_UUID explicitly AKASHI Takahiro
2023-10-26 12:47 ` Tom Rini
2023-10-26 12:47 ` [RFC 00/13] cmd: bootefi: refactor the code for bootmgr Tom Rini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231026124752.GF496310@bill-the-cat \
--to=trini@konsulko.com \
--cc=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \
--cc=jbx6244@gmail.com \
--cc=sjg@chromium.org \
--cc=takahiro.akashi@linaro.org \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
--cc=xypron.glpk@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox