From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from phobos.denx.de (phobos.denx.de [85.214.62.61]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B7C4C4167B for ; Thu, 9 Nov 2023 21:33:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from h2850616.stratoserver.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by phobos.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F96C87691; Thu, 9 Nov 2023 22:33:56 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=konsulko.com Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=konsulko.com header.i=@konsulko.com header.b="EFNzZnLX"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by phobos.denx.de (Postfix, from userid 109) id 25328876A2; Thu, 9 Nov 2023 22:33:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-ua1-x92d.google.com (mail-ua1-x92d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::92d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by phobos.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CEB7B87692 for ; Thu, 9 Nov 2023 22:33:52 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=konsulko.com Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=trini@konsulko.com Received: by mail-ua1-x92d.google.com with SMTP id a1e0cc1a2514c-7b9ff6d89e6so566734241.3 for ; Thu, 09 Nov 2023 13:33:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=konsulko.com; s=google; t=1699565631; x=1700170431; darn=lists.denx.de; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=gginIYiiImSPvPofNfGz8EtssxQrFmHHeZoGWsd0aFI=; b=EFNzZnLXy3e6N2Tv8dyv+sG2L7rIoCdNCElxEPNzB756UBO3/nxEpmtj+4vHWwwLYY zsHgccbgmm/CLmRHfAeg0gCuCqhEMAErwZ+FwvKY4WDJ2nfFXyvk3Dw31weeNvjRXr/T VUoMFd0Qmbo3AqMMUZeiQTH3dpYdoyPdPGTyg= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1699565631; x=1700170431; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=gginIYiiImSPvPofNfGz8EtssxQrFmHHeZoGWsd0aFI=; b=B8J53iq3aR6W+eaauNto6e6RNXzbazdETNyOfkA9btHt1duYYtmkIvenHtXiNXJ0cK XB+A16GeLYQB/ddE72z/PwvfQFR9afL60UzeiZ83/NSLWI7w2fYRaT6U+fK3SGlKMtg6 fpuPDVA/blF51IYGQqkaPl5WgosWM94uaBLRoPCeKiXynJcZTuuMt/Jn12oVnDOEvk7K Jvi+a0/g+ZFhV+1E+Mpnnn2F7bGl0n+ebuFWQGn11OvdfeRo09ejEQq2X4sLYghadtVe +P9sxWBzE7T8B4PphVZEV2LD/pI/UDR1DpPR5FDeKUyjgsZ0OhMCLDDnDQOQVM22cp/f ThXA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yxczmb6uCquNhTjSRTnqzeLZLvUbVfN4tHLv5lwbiMFJ96dmJm6 qhdgfXKYEn59Ea0R11Sq0KA6fg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEqZ7f4ZQsCdC5MNwgLr42zQRIzRVW0Fstu11HA0t43ctUJCT89gGKLouBk0fRWWs5Faiy05g== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:1048:b0:45d:9d27:215c with SMTP id h8-20020a056102104800b0045d9d27215cmr6022045vsq.1.1699565631317; Thu, 09 Nov 2023 13:33:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from bill-the-cat (2603-6081-7b00-6400-58a3-ea36-c2a1-60cb.res6.spectrum.com. [2603:6081:7b00:6400:58a3:ea36:c2a1:60cb]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o11-20020a056214108b00b0067095b0c473sm2423849qvr.11.2023.11.09.13.33.49 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 09 Nov 2023 13:33:50 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2023 16:33:48 -0500 From: Tom Rini To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Pierre-Cl=E9ment?= Tosi Cc: Chris Packham , u-boot@lists.denx.de, Bin Meng , Marc Zyngier , Peng Fan , Simon Glass , Will Deacon , Ye Li , "Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu)" , meitao , Alistair Delva Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Revert HAFDBS changes Message-ID: <20231109213348.GP6601@bill-the-cat> References: <20231027002409.430285-1-judge.packham@gmail.com> <20231027094947.bhtwngq26e3loya5@google.com> <20231027172237.GB496310@bill-the-cat> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="S1dLDTc1TMY+O52+" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20231027172237.GB496310@bill-the-cat> X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett X-BeenThere: u-boot@lists.denx.de X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39 Precedence: list List-Id: U-Boot discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de Sender: "U-Boot" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.8 at phobos.denx.de X-Virus-Status: Clean --S1dLDTc1TMY+O52+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 01:22:37PM -0400, Tom Rini wrote: > On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 10:49:47AM +0100, Pierre-Cl=E9ment Tosi wrote: > > Hi Chris, > >=20 > > On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 01:23:51PM +1300, Chris Packham wrote: > > > As discussed this series reverts the HAFDBS changes that caused an is= sue > > > on AC5/AC5X. I think there are some improvements that can be made to = the > > > initial memory map for the AC5/AC5X but so far nothing I've found mak= es > > > it compatible with the HAFDBS changes. > >=20 > > Would you mind briefly explaining what those issues are and/or point me= to the > > discussion where it was decided to revert these patches? > >=20 > > The feature is quite useful for users of CONFIG_CMO_BY_VA_ONLY, to spee= d up the > > boot sequence: instead of reverting these patches altogether, would a r= easonable > > alternative be to put them behind a build option? > >=20 > > Also, could you confirm that the "initial memory map" you are referring= to above > > only describes actual memory as, IIRC, some boards were using mappings = **much** > > larger than their DRAM address space? >=20 > The most details are in this thread: > https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/CAFOYHZC_Dveax85n0fLr5BFyZcLqsvUssn=3DJ0oH= yvN75bTaCUw@mail.gmail.com/ > with some follow-up in: > https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/CAFOYHZB7jJWwD24oWzx6u55w2whHYjK56f=3DQyN0= LWU4Z8dSP+Q@mail.gmail.com/ Checking to see if you have any feedback for these platforms? I would like to have them working again one way or another in v2024.01, thanks. --=20 Tom --S1dLDTc1TMY+O52+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGzBAABCgAdFiEEGjx/cOCPqxcHgJu/FHw5/5Y0tywFAmVNUDwACgkQFHw5/5Y0 tyyiFAwAtNaEjfBdxKo1JC8mrUiajQSl1Y5Y5RWs3frU/2jEF4MXPoV0B5tv71Gv CqLT9tH1fJs5TsTMdW/FoXYfSPiAJYtAs16xVoy4KFyDxlbZOdeANcIUw0Mm0KYD 9CD3bS/MQV01py9uwE7cySUV1I+dip2aSqy/C4k2V/b4Q7VUqH6q+mOnmKIPTKxd z/fTQnLTFSll1qVj48y2UGw1dfvlUWAfLLL6qtz69D3RiTA5YnEoMS5IOjuZap7e 3GrZjxq2PKuFU0qPJY9p25oQwLBeESQGAcNQEXTaiTtdD8hsiBx0gP05R5EQ5rJR RbgsFTPq/quLssgMy+7+3S1vgMJXOf/IQ2k1C5+4NcBlTC1eI8WGB+vgqmSD4HY2 1Cot41r0KKhMq1K5NbtghnzPsYxMRmjo6vzYS09+BZUeAvmkLMZq8zvGBko/9vAP Zvf/hLxW80Kv8meXJwY75WKArgfJbp01Ydi9s54P9HhohIPxBQe1gKS93w4ISBkJ 4+jgSpnM =I7zi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --S1dLDTc1TMY+O52+--